Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Let's hear your review of 'Sully' >

Let's hear your review of 'Sully'

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Let's hear your review of 'Sully'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2016, 06:55 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 276
Default

Just got back from seeing Sully. Really well done movie IMO. Definitely worth seeing.
Salukidawg is offline  
Old 09-10-2016, 07:38 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,909
Default

I'll catch the movie when on a flight from LGA, perhaps on... oh wait. USAIR is no longer... never mind. At the end of the day... why see it... you know like titanic? most of us know how it ends... don't we?
captjns is offline  
Old 09-10-2016, 07:46 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
I'll catch the movie when on a flight from LGA, perhaps on... oh wait. USAIR is no longer... never mind. At the end of the day... why see it... you know like titanic? most of us know how it ends... don't we?
Because it's a good drama. The movie is not shown in a chronological order from day before accident, day of accident and crash sequence, and post crash investigations. It's done with a flash-back type thing and that really adds to how well the movie was done.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-10-2016, 08:26 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
I'll catch the movie when on a flight from LGA, perhaps on... oh wait. USAIR is no longer... never mind. At the end of the day... why see it... you know like titanic? most of us know how it ends... don't we?
Then why ever see a war movie?
If that is the only reason you'd go to see a movie......well.

As far as the FAA trying to violate Sully for saying 'Good day'........Bull.

A large article in the USA Today (yesterday) had a detailed write-up about some of the details in the making of the movie and the collaboration between Eastwood, Hanks, and Sully. One paraphrase between Hanks and Sully went something like 'Hanks: I'm going to say some things you didn't say, I'm going to do some things you didn't do; other than that - let's make it as accurate as possible.'
Sully had been given a copy of the script of course and had highlighted, dog-eared, and made notes to discuss throughout.

The whole thing is probably about as accurate as you're going to get with a Hollywood production.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 09-10-2016, 09:54 PM
  #25  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

A few small issues. The NTSB was overly-villainized as being on a witch hunt, the investigation seemed over in a week, and their before takeoff checklist was more of a wooden read-then-do than a flow. A few other minor things, some of which have been addressed, but overall that's being nitpicky because it's a solid movie. The crash was covered very well, Hanks and Eckhart do commendable jobs, and Eastwood is still doing surprisingly great work at 86.

In fact, the crash is real enough that it hits close to home. I don't mean in a 9/11 way or anything, but just makes you think, "Wow, could be me in the hot seat next time."
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 09-10-2016, 10:14 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 40
Default

There was much attention to detail in the film with regard to airline/aircraft operations.

They used actual USAirways uniforms, checklists, and QRH. The ID cards were correct, and I believe "Sully" and "Jeff" were wearing their union wings. Also, the scenes that show the simulations of returning to an airport used actual USAirways check airmen.


The only miss I noted, were the scenes that showed the Engine Warning Display portraying IAE engines with EPR at the top, rather than the correct CFM N1 display on N106US.

All in all, good film and representation of the actual accident and response.

Thumbs up from this critic!
AAFlagship is offline  
Old 09-10-2016, 10:41 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Position: A350 CA
Posts: 295
Default

The only reason why the movie was ok is because of Tom Hanks, other than that it was boring.
NYC Pilot is offline  
Old 09-11-2016, 05:00 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by SydKat View Post
It was okay but I'd say save your money and wait for it to come out on Netflix or Redbox. It was well done considering everyone knows the story. Some parts overly technical, but accurate. I thought it was funny also how every home scene had the stereotype of the worried pilot wife in the kitchen. And apparently she calls her husband Sully? Okay. They also seem to try VERY hard to portray the crew as heroes, even glancing over the fact that they lost both engines yet continued straight ahead for 35 seconds instead of immediately turning back to an airport, and suggest they would have made it, but then ignore this fact. I thought the interplay between the pilots, union reps, management, and government officials was pretty good, having been a union rep for many years and attended many meetings where not everyone has a glass of water. All in all worth seeing.
Is waiting a whole 35 seconds before doing anything really that big of a deal? Was that comment for real? I teach pilots to take a deep breath before doing anything dealing with an abnormality. So maybe they took 2 deep breaths, it would be hard to believe you lost 2 engines. I am just a Turboprop flunkie but 35 seconds doesnt seem all that long to me.
sherpster is offline  
Old 09-11-2016, 05:26 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Car Ramrod's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus FO
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by NYC Pilot View Post
The only reason why the movie was ok is because of Tom Hanks, other than that it was boring.
I agree that it would be a little boring if it were a fictional film, but the fact that this was a real event made it very enjoyable to watch for me. I don't think this story could have been told any better than the movie did. I would recommend it.
Car Ramrod is offline  
Old 09-11-2016, 05:33 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 55
Default

Some of the small things that a general audience will never pick up on nag me the most. Like in the F-4 flashback:

"Say heading"

"020 degrees"(shot of him lined up on final)

"Cleared to land runway 21"

(Lands on runway 22)

Seems like any aviation consultant could iron out those kinks, but there's probably also a lot to coordinate between the script and the final footage and locations used and all that stuff.
trescommas is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FierceFerret
Career Questions
4
11-03-2015 04:00 PM
CloudSailor
FedEx
96
10-17-2015 07:20 AM
Grumble
Major
10
11-11-2010 11:30 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
12
06-26-2006 12:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices