Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
Merged CAL/UAL seniority lists >

Merged CAL/UAL seniority lists

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Merged CAL/UAL seniority lists

Old 05-04-2010, 06:37 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,879
Default

The original post is from FOUR (4) YEARS AGO! It wouldn't even be close to relevant or accurate today.

Nothing to see here...move along.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 07:00 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A350
Posts: 193
Default

it was a while ago ...but I believe TWA was in chapter 11....then they declared chapter 7....so in theory AA purchased assets of the liquidated airline...this was never an actual merger....that is why the twa pilots were stapled to aa list. did twa actualy HAVE to declare chapter 7?? ...is the fishy part.
astrojet is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 07:16 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by War Eagle 83 View Post
I can't wait to see this abortion of a "list" by ALPO!!!!! Also, how are you UAL guys and gals gonna like flying with all the CO scabs???? This is just too funny!!! have fun at Continited, or is it Unitenental. OK. Fire away!!!!!

What an embarrassing thing to say.

If you want to make comments like that, you should change your user name so as not to give the impression that you represent the Auburn Family in any way, shape, or form. Here's a little reminder about how true Auburn people act:

THE AUBURN CREED

I believe that this is a practical world and that I can count only on what I earn. Therefore, I believe in work, hard work.

I believe in education, which gives me the knowledge to work wisely and trains my mind and my hands to work skillfully.

I believe in honesty and truthfulness, without which I cannot win the respect and confidence of my fellow men.

I believe in a sound mind, in a sound body and a spirit that is not afraid, and in clean sports that develop these qualities.

I believe in obedience to law because it protects the rights of all.

I believe in the human touch, which cultivates sympathy with my fellow men and mutual helpfulness and brings happiness for all.

I believe in my Country, because it is a land of freedom and because it is my own home, and that I can best serve that country by "doing justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with my God."

And because Auburn men and women believe in these things, I believe in Auburn and love it.

-George Petrie (1945)
shiznit is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 07:38 AM
  #24  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD View Post
For information only, here is a merged seniority list for a Date of Hire integration of the UAL and CAL lists. This is for information only, please read the disclaimer on the file download.

http://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/o...Itemid,85.html

We're looking for the AMR, NWA, and DAL Lists, please PM me if you'd like to submit your seniority list. All lists are de-identified [before being published here] with names and employee numbers removed.
HSLD....care to publish the Relative Senority Lists between CAL & UAL????

If you 'don't' have it, I'll be glad to supply to you. Have 2 list's based on R.S.- furloughs included....as well as the Active Pilots only.....and YES, all names/emply #'s removed for you in advance to protect I.D.

PM me and I'll send it your way so we can weigh both for 'all' to view. I'm sure you would be 'open' to showing 'all options'?? You know....."Fair & Unbias"
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 07:57 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by War Eagle 83 View Post
I can't wait to see this abortion of a "list" by ALPO!!!!! Also, how are you UAL guys and gals gonna like flying with all the CO scabs???? This is just too funny!!! have fun at Continited, or is it Unitenental. OK. Fire away!!!!!
I sure the UAL guys will enjoy flying with the CAL scabs as much as we CAL pilots will enjoy flying with the UAL scabs.

If I had my way, we lose all the scabs on both sides and bring back all the furloughed guys!
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 08:28 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy View Post
HSLD....care to publish the Relative Senority Lists between CAL & UAL????

If you 'don't' have it, I'll be glad to supply to you. Have 2 list's based on R.S.- furloughs included....as well as the Active Pilots only.....and YES, all names/emply #'s removed for you in advance to protect I.D.

PM me and I'll send it your way so we can weigh both for 'all' to view. I'm sure you would be 'open' to showing 'all options'?? You know....."Fair & Unbias"
Socal,

We all need to keep in mind that when these lists are published, and they will, no one really expects a straight date of hire integration. On the other hand, I would be very surprised if there was a straight relative seniority integration as well. The final list when produced, I am quite confident, will surprise most.

There's a thread going on within the UAL forum talking about how we need to set a high standard and treat each group with respect and let our respective merger committees do the work. In the end we will be flying together and we have a large contract in front of us.

With that being said, publish the lists and break out the olives and martinis.
Fritzthepilot is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 08:35 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy View Post
HSLD....care to publish the Relative Senority Lists between CAL & UAL????

If you 'don't' have it, I'll be glad to supply to you. Have 2 list's based on R.S.- furloughs included....as well as the Active Pilots only.....and YES, all names/emply #'s removed for you in advance to protect I.D.

PM me and I'll send it your way so we can weigh both for 'all' to view. I'm sure you would be 'open' to showing 'all options'?? You know....."Fair & Unbias"

SoCAl,

Check your PM, please.
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 08:58 AM
  #28  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot View Post
Socal,

We all need to keep in mind that when these lists are published, and they will, no one really expects a straight date of hire integration. On the other hand, I would be very surprised if there was a straight relative seniority integration as well. The final list when produced, I am quite confident, will surprise most.

There's a thread going on within the UAL forum talking about how we need to set a high standard and treat each group with respect and let our respective merger committees do the work. In the end we will be flying together and we have a large contract in front of us.

With that being said, publish the lists and break out the olives and martinis.
Fritz....

I hear what your saying & could not agree with you more. "Tongue and Cheek", I may have come across as "snide", not meant as such.

As you pointed out, DOH vs Straight Relative Seniority, both are at the far ends of each spectrum in this SLI.....Strictly one, or the other, would present a Windfall for one group in this integration. I think we (as MANY others) can agree, a one-sided Windfall would be unfair/unbalanced.....not something we want to embark on in a constructive integration.

The point I was trying to make (and be it valid), if someone (who is a CO-Founder and UAL Pilot) wants to present a DOH list (which if solely used would be considered a Windfall as we mentioned above), what's wrong with someone else 'suggesting' that he also offer the other side of the coin in weighing in on what a Relative Seniority List would look like as well?? IF there are options/ideas to put on the table to view it from all prospective's, why not welcome it?? Again, that's all I was pointing out. If that's perceived as being out of line, I would have to disagree.

I whole-heartedly agree with you on the what a great opportunity we have in coming to together and making the NEW UAL one of the worlds most formidable carrier's. In doing so, we will have to rub elbows/constructively share ideas on how we can fairly integrate into ONE VOICE via an amicable SLI. This will be the ONLY way we can make a unified stance in 'negotiating' with mgt in obtaining the BEST CBA possible, not only UAL Pilots, but also holding the company's feet the fire on SCOPE & JV Flying as it pertains to industry wide.

In the end, I apologize for any 'wrong tone' that I may have presented to you, HSLD, or any other reader. Just a valid point/suggestion in my eyes, thus the post.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 09:04 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Boeing
Posts: 89
Default

I agree with most of what you say but have a hard time understanding how straight relative senority with fences is somehow on one end of the 'windfall' spectrum. Seems pretty middle of the road to me.
southbound is offline  
Old 05-04-2010, 09:14 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Default

Socal,

I did not mean to suggest you were displaying a wrong tone. Far from it. I was more or less speaking through you to everyone else. Once people see a list of any sort, many will tend to, for lack of a better term, "keyboard quarterback."

Lists are just that. There are many variables that eventually lead to our integration. Take care and see you around the school yard.
Fritzthepilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FloatGeek
Major
33
01-14-2011 06:41 AM
angelicm3
Regional
15
05-29-2006 04:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices