Blackbird Safety Record
10-10-2009, 07:07 AM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Blackbird Safety Record
I watched a 'History' Channel show this morning on the SR-71 Blackbird.
At the end of the show, a former Wing Commander (Pat Halloran) said that the SR-71 Blackbird is the ONLY USAF operational aircraft that has never lost an aircrew. This is an impressive achievement considering, as he said, the environment (altitude, airspeeds, and temperatures) at which the aircraft operated and in spite of being fired upon over 4,000 by the most sophisticated anti-air defenses in existence at the time.
USMCFLYR
At the end of the show, a former Wing Commander (Pat Halloran) said that the SR-71 Blackbird is the ONLY USAF operational aircraft that has never lost an aircrew. This is an impressive achievement considering, as he said, the environment (altitude, airspeeds, and temperatures) at which the aircraft operated and in spite of being fired upon over 4,000 by the most sophisticated anti-air defenses in existence at the time.
USMCFLYR
10-10-2009, 08:42 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Originally Posted by EP11
I suppose if you said it was the only surveillance platform to never have lost an operational aircrew, then I would be likely to believe it.
I certainly can't go through all USAF operational aircraft, but I thnk about the ones that I know a little about I can't think of another. I assume that this statistic must be something of a badge of honor among SR-71 crews.
Your saying "operational aircrew" is a good way to put it though. That would seem to exclude to testing or training losses.
USMCFLYR
10-10-2009, 09:40 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
One of those miracles of the internet 
It seems this question was previously asked on a different military forum.
This website was given for reference.
If the information given in this website is accurate, then obviously Pat Halloran must have some different definition or criteria for his statement.
USMCFLYR
It seems this question was previously asked on a different military forum.
This website was given for reference.
If the information given in this website is accurate, then obviously Pat Halloran must have some different definition or criteria for his statement.
USMCFLYR
10-10-2009, 10:35 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Only CIA and test crews were lost. Pat was a USAF wing commander, and no USAF crews were lost - that was a true statement. If the CIA wants to go try to launch drones (lost one launch control officer that way) or mount equipment in the cockpit that would possibly inhibit a successful ejection (rumored fatality cause), etc - the USAF doesn't need to claim those losses.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
