Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USCG TERA for FY15....Finally! >

USCG TERA for FY15....Finally!

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

USCG TERA for FY15....Finally!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2014, 06:42 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: C-130H (ret)
Posts: 81
Default USCG TERA for FY15....Finally!

The Coast Guard just released their solicitation for FY-15 TERA early retirement applications.

http://www.uscg.mil/announcements/al...14_ALCGPSC.txt

-4FF
4FrozenFans is offline  
Old 06-23-2014, 07:13 PM
  #2  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by 4FrozenFans View Post
The Coast Guard just released their solicitation for FY-15 TERA early retirement applications.

http://www.uscg.mil/announcements/al...14_ALCGPSC.txt

-4FF
Why does active duty (of any branch) need early retirements-at least pilot wise- right now? Sorry I'm just a guard guy, your active duty ways frighten and confuse me.
block30 is offline  
Old 06-23-2014, 11:12 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
jkhill0's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: B717
Posts: 56
Default

Mandated force end-strength requirements. At some point the bodies have to go one way or another. The first few waves were/are being handled with selective early retirement boards, voluntary sep programs and early retirement programs.

The USAF has already opened and closed TERA three times since January. They will (in my opinion and experience) keep doing it until they meet the projected end-strength requirements mandated by Congress. Next will be the RIFs...it all comes down to money.
jkhill0 is offline  
Old 06-24-2014, 07:07 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,220
Default

Originally Posted by block30 View Post
Why does active duty (of any branch) need early retirements-at least pilot wise- right now? Sorry I'm just a guard guy, your active duty ways frighten and confuse me.
USCG AD is a pretty desirable gig...they mostly don't want to leave.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-24-2014, 02:47 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: C-130H (ret)
Posts: 81
Default

The Coast Guard doesn't sort out the officers by specialty. They all get compared against one another in one seniority list; aviators, boat drivers, marine safety, etc, compete against one another for promotion. So, playing the "game" becomes increasingly more difficult, especially when trying to stay current and airline-competitive towards the end of your career.

Leaving early is not for everyone. But, when a big hiring wave comes along and one has an opportunity to get a retirement, along with a two-year head start at the airlines, and avoid an inevitable cubicle assignment, TERA can be a good deal.

-4FF
4FrozenFans is offline  
Old 06-25-2015, 01:56 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
propfails2FX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 266
Default

Having recently transitioned from CG to airlines, I now fully appreciate the power of seniority.

Folks, think VERY HARD about extending a year to 18 months to collect TERA, vice bailing immediately during a strong airline hiring wave. The next year and a half of hiring represents the same amount of folks hired in the past 7 years at my company (and many others).

There are Coasties who are separation eligible that are waiting for the TERA selection list to be published in November, 2015 in order to take a retirement in late 2016. I don't know the dollar amount of losing 1200-1500 seniority numbers, but it's significant. Not to mention the impact on QOL while at the company. If someone has crunched the numbers regarding TERA vs. airline 401K, please post them.
propfails2FX is offline  
Old 07-05-2015, 08:49 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
propfails2FX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 266
Default

In an effort to beat a dead horse:

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
"The continuing aircraft deliveries require staffing increases on the fleet. Between now and the summer of 2016, we expect to add approximately 13 incremental aircraft, training will therefore need to continue at maximum or near maximum capacity, with a significant portion of training at off-site locations.

Our new-hire plan totals roughly 1,600 pilots over the next 18 months, spread across our 737and 320 fleets.

Given our 737 fleet is still not balanced, the upcoming vacancies will serve three purposes: rebalancing the fleet, funding new hires, and continuing the regular staffing process. To that extent, we will continue modest growth in DCA, along with SFO, ORD, and LAX. IAH will reduce in size, as previously announced."
propfails2FX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oxf16
Military
46
05-23-2014 01:09 PM
flybywire44
American
19
04-21-2013 04:25 AM
JimHalpert
Military
15
08-28-2011 11:16 AM
Flitestar
Military
3
03-20-2009 07:41 PM
hslightnin
Regional
11
03-06-2009 10:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices