Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
KC130 refuels F35 over Beaufort, SC >

KC130 refuels F35 over Beaufort, SC

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

KC130 refuels F35 over Beaufort, SC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2015, 08:12 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default KC130 refuels F35 over Beaufort, SC

Action starts about 1:30 in. Nice shots of the F35 from the KC130 with the trunk open.

N9373M is offline  
Old 03-24-2015, 08:50 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 249
Default

Not a 35 fan, but yeah, still cool!
TrakTrak is offline  
Old 03-24-2015, 12:18 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default Contrails

Surprised they show the F35's dispersing contrails. Very thin application from the wing tips. I guess that's the CAS portion of the chemical. Disperse in small amounts so as to not contaminate your own troops.
N9373M is offline  
Old 03-24-2015, 01:58 PM
  #4  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

So, what was the purpose of the Lead C-130?

This is what you do when a floundering program gets intense Congressional scrutiny, led by a grass-roots effort. You launch two C-130s for a refueling mission, and make a video, hoping it will impress your audience.

If this was an actual refueling test, a chase plane, such as an F-18D, would have been closer to film it.

There are pics on the web of a RAF Typhoon seemingly about to enter the ramp of a Herc. Looks like some attempt was made here to emulate. First shot he stayed low for wake, so second, he kept closing from lower altitude, then broke away.

The s-turns may impress members of Congress, but were obviously choreographed by request.

I'd be more impressed if it could actually kill our enemies and break his stuff. It has a limited capacity for either.

Using 2014 GAO data for Air Force F-35s and C-130s, the total flying cost per hour of this formation was $251,000.00.......or $69.72 a second.

Your tax dollars at work.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 03-24-2015, 05:08 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Looks like some regular refueling work with some squadron Marines riding along for a look. Certainly didn't look polished enough for serious propaganda.

In any case, I'm more interested in the KC-130Js!
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-25-2015, 06:05 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Looks like some regular refueling work with some squadron Marines riding along for a look. Certainly didn't look polished enough for serious propaganda.

In any case, I'm more interested in the KC-130Js!
Of course it's scripted!! My old man use to refuel fighters over Vietnam and this kind of "air work" was rarely seen in a real world air to air operation. Of course, he did say there was the occasional "hot dog" to break up the monotony of the day. Over priced fighters at best but I hope we get as much use out of them as we have the ole C-130.
brianb is offline  
Old 03-25-2015, 10:09 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

I forecast a lot of broken probes.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 03-25-2015, 02:09 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by brianb View Post
Of course it's scripted!! My old man use to refuel fighters over Vietnam and this kind of "air work" was rarely seen in a real world air to air operation. Of course, he did say there was the occasional "hot dog" to break up the monotony of the day. Over priced fighters at best but I hope we get as much use out of them as we have the ole C-130.
I didn't say it wasn't scripted.
I said it wasn't polished enough for some real propaganda.
We did little shows for people riding in the back once in awhile.
They didn't drop the hatch, but you could see people taking pictures/movies out of the side windows.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-25-2015, 06:00 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Posts: 880
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
I didn't say it wasn't scripted.
I said it wasn't polished enough for some real propaganda.
We did little shows for people riding in the back once in awhile.
They didn't drop the hatch, but you could see people taking pictures/movies out of the side windows.
Easy big fella, I wasn't dropping a downer on you. It was more of a comment to oneself. Down a cold one.
brianb is offline  
Old 03-25-2015, 06:05 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
So, what was the purpose of the Lead C-130?

This is what you do when a floundering program gets intense Congressional scrutiny, led by a grass-roots effort. You launch two C-130s for a refueling mission, and make a video, hoping it will impress your audience.

If this was an actual refueling test, a chase plane, such as an F-18D, would have been closer to film it.

There are pics on the web of a RAF Typhoon seemingly about to enter the ramp of a Herc. Looks like some attempt was made here to emulate. First shot he stayed low for wake, so second, he kept closing from lower altitude, then broke away.

The s-turns may impress members of Congress, but were obviously choreographed by request.

I'd be more impressed if it could actually kill our enemies and break his stuff. It has a limited capacity for either.

Using 2014 GAO data for Air Force F-35s and C-130s, the total flying cost per hour of this formation was $251,000.00.......or $69.72 a second.

Your tax dollars at work.
If that would have been an A-10 the pilots would be brought up on charges. But, because it's a POS JSF it's considered a commercial for the airplane. Grunts in the sky was banned by the AF because it portrayed the A-10 in combat in a favorable light.

This is trash. Watch Grunts in the Sky.
Flamer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
N9373M
Safety
1
02-23-2015 07:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices