Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
ATP Centerline Thrust Hours? >

ATP Centerline Thrust Hours?

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

ATP Centerline Thrust Hours?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2015, 07:59 AM
  #21  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by StrikerB View Post
ME time is ME time, totally irrelevant if it's CL thrust or not (for logging reasons) once the restriction is removed.
Actually, it doesn't matter before the restriction is removed, either.

There's no such thing as "centerline thrust multi engine time." Period.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 04:05 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
The Hornet is at least one example.
The C/Ds with EPEs have the language in the NATOPS for Vmc and I'd bet the E/Fs are the same - but I've not read their NATOPS.
Looked this morning, Rhino and Growler both do as well.
andrewtac is offline  
Old 12-05-2015, 10:15 PM
  #23  
Reserve by choice
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
The Hornet is at least one example.
The C/Ds with EPEs have the language in the NATOPS for Vmc and I'd bet the E/Fs are the same - but I've not read their NATOPS.

This is where that 'military friendly' FSDO (or DPEs) comes into play.
The one nearest NAS Lemoore knew all about the updates and such but others might not know.
USMCFLYR,
I brought this up with the San Diego FSDO when I was getting ready for my ATP check. They were adamant that the Hornet fit the bill for centerline thrust (not an issue because I just did the Vmc demo on my check in the Seneca). The other thing to note was that several guys in my squadron had some issues with CFI/I mil comp. The larger issue I see is that the FSDOs are not consistently applying FAA regulations. You know a FSDO has issues when different employees there disagree on an interpretation (for example, I heard gouge to avoid employee X, or to ask for a different guy).
S/F,
Slew
BSlew7523 is offline  
Old 12-05-2015, 11:08 PM
  #24  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
Actually, it doesn't matter before the restriction is removed, either.

There's no such thing as "centerline thrust multi engine time." Period.
Guess you neve heard of the CE-337 Skymaster.
Thedude is offline  
Old 12-05-2015, 11:32 PM
  #25  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by andrewtac View Post
Looked this morning, Rhino and Growler both do as well.
NATOPS excerpt:

Single engine minimum control speed (Vmc) is defined as the
minimum airspeed required to maintain controlled flight with one engine operating. Vmc airspeeds
were determined at 14° AOA for catapult launches, and 12° AOA for all other circumstances. Vmc
airspeed varies depending on AOA, lateral asymmetry, altitude, and day temperature. For an engine
failure off the catapult, 14° AOA provides the best compromise between arresting rate of descent off
the bow and controllability (increased AOA helps arrest sink but also reduces lateral-directional
controllability). In all cases, once control is established (and sink is stopped), allow the aircraft to
accelerate to on-speed to provide the best flyaway handling qualities. When an engine fails in flaps
HALF or FULL, the first perceptible aircraft motion is a yaw toward the failed engine. The rudders are
the primary flight control surface used to counter the yaw caused by the operating engine. Use rudder
to coordinate flight. Using too little rudder pedal may not counter yaw and may cause controllability
problems. In addition to yawing into the failed engine, the aircraft also tends to roll into the failed
engine. The natural pilot reaction is to oppose the roll with lateral stick, but the resulting differential
aileron deflection generates adverse yaw and increases the demand on the rudders to maintain
directional control. As AOA increases above 10° AOA, the aircraft becomes less directionally stable and
rudder control effectiveness deteriorates. In this instance, the rudders may become saturated (surfaces
against the stops). When saturated, the rudders cannot counter any additional adverse yaw, resulting
in an increase in sideslip and the potential for an adverse yaw departure. If airspeed is too slow, the
rudders cannot generate enough control power to oppose the yaw toward the failed engine.
gtg941f is offline  
Old 12-05-2015, 11:52 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Curious, where does it mention the speed?
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 12-05-2015, 11:55 PM
  #27  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
Curious, where does it mention the speed?
Vmc is given in terms of angle of attack. This results in a varying speed that is dependent upon aircraft weight.
gtg941f is offline  
Old 12-06-2015, 07:40 AM
  #28  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude View Post
Guess you neve heard of the CE-337 Skymaster.
Sure I've heard of it...and time logged in it is called "multiengine" and not "multiengine centerline thrust".
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 12-06-2015, 09:41 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Therein lies the potential reason for the discrepancy with the Hornet. Although the FAA is coming around to recognizing AOA, for now (until the revised Part 23 is published), Certification standards require a Vmc airspeed be published in the AFM and indicated by a red radial line on the airspeed indicator.

Ther is a process for the 8900.1 to be revised. Anyone can e-mail the FSIMS librarian with proposed changes...
PerfInit is offline  
Old 12-06-2015, 10:05 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by gtg941f View Post
Vmc is given in terms of angle of attack. This results in a varying speed that is dependent upon aircraft weight.
As I read it, it said the airspeeds were determined at a given AOA, but it seems to be missing the airspeeds, although "airspeed" is mentioned several times? Is this something they left out on purpose? The point of a Vmc is to assign a minimum airspeed, the talk about AOA doesn't seem as definitive. Is it 10, 12 or 14? Published Vmc airspeed is the FAA requirement, not multiple AOA.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tee1Up
JetBlue
14332
04-07-2024 09:39 AM
haberdasher
Flight Schools and Training
6
03-06-2015 04:04 PM
av8raaron
Military
9
03-19-2014 07:33 AM
sigtauenus
Military
28
09-01-2007 08:40 PM
16driver
Flight Schools and Training
2
07-01-2005 09:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices