Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Is the Air Force really short of pilots? >

Is the Air Force really short of pilots?

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Is the Air Force really short of pilots?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2016, 06:42 AM
  #11  
Running the House
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Wow. Some guys would probably be inclined to RESIGN and give up the retirement if they're at a good major.

Have a close friend who is on terminal and at FedEx, I can see it.....
Lurking is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 06:59 AM
  #12  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by Lurking View Post
Apparently the decision to not allow 11F guys to go to the academy to teach has had an affect that fewer and fewer USAFA grads are putting in for flying slots or even choosing fighters
Similar thing at the UPT bases. Short of 11Fs, so they go to the T-38. Almost non-represented in T-6 squadrons---maybe one in 30.

IPs talk up their previous life, which is airlift. Students see IPs as role models; top guys in classes aren't asking for T-38s.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 09:23 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Originally Posted by Lurking View Post
Apparently the decision to not allow 11F guys to go to the academy to teach has had an affect that fewer and fewer USAFA grads are putting in for flying slots or even choosing fighters
As of a year ago there were plenty of fighter guys. At least relative to the overall number of pilots there. There was also no real trouble filling up the upt slots.

At that age you could tell them every awful horrible bad thing about flying and nothing good and they'll still sign up. I would have.

That said, a few kids that decided against flying would talk about the 10 year commitment. In my small sample size that was the only real negative that seemed to affect anyone.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 10:18 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,192
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
Similar thing at the UPT bases. Short of 11Fs, so they go to the T-38. Almost non-represented in T-6 squadrons---maybe one in 30.

IPs talk up their previous life, which is airlift. Students see IPs as role models; top guys in classes aren't asking for T-38s.
This was a problem when I went through Navy primary. They brought in one lone Marine Maj F-18 guy. Great dude, he really over turned the apple cart and put to rest all the P-3 propaganda that was being sold to the students. Suddenly everyone wanted jets again.
Grumble is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 01:00 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
This was a problem when I went through Navy primary. They brought in one lone Marine Maj F-18 guy. Great dude, he really over turned the apple cart and put to rest all the P-3 propaganda that was being sold to the students. Suddenly everyone wanted jets again.
When I went threw if you had fighter grades you were going fighters period. Not enough students making the jet grade minimums.
WhatNow is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 02:28 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
This was a problem when I went through Navy primary. They brought in one lone Marine Maj F-18 guy. Great dude, he really over turned the apple cart and put to rest all the P-3 propaganda that was being sold to the students. Suddenly everyone wanted jets again.
Grumble -

What were this Maj's initials (or callsign) and what squadron and timeframe are you talking about?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 03:22 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MooseAg03's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 282
Default

There are a lot of non-vol'd pilots sitting in GCSs who could fill some of these slots. Unfortunately, by the time they get their heads out and replace us with 18Xers, most of us will be gone already.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MooseAg03 is offline  
Old 05-04-2016, 10:09 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,192
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Grumble -

What were this Maj's initials (or callsign) and what squadron and timeframe are you talking about?
PM sent

Filler
Grumble is offline  
Old 05-06-2016, 08:26 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Jabba's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Pilot
Posts: 46
Default

One of the probs AF wise is Flight screening in Pueblo. They are washing out about 25% on candidates--when they are flying an airplane that costs $50 an hour to operate. Since this is the initial flying experience for many--I think that program needs to open up a bit. I'm not saying lower standards, but maybe provide more opportunity than the 88/89 ride and out. That is well and good when we have plenty of pilots, but maybe not when we are entering this type of shortage.
Jabba is offline  
Old 05-06-2016, 08:57 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
One of the probs AF wise is Flight screening in Pueblo. They are washing out about 25% on candidates--when they are flying an airplane that costs $50 an hour to operate. Since this is the initial flying experience for many--I think that program needs to open up a bit. I'm not saying lower standards, but maybe provide more opportunity than the 88/89 ride and out. That is well and good when we have plenty of pilots, but maybe not when we are entering this type of shortage.
This is not a good idea. Flight screening is supposed to be just that. Screening potential UPT candidates for aptitude prior to more demanding training. Letting weaklings into UPT isn't going to help the USAF or the candidate.

If they can't figure out a basic VFR single engine recip in the time allotted, they're probably not going to do any better once they get into more demanding training scenarios in UPT.

Unless they've changed the program significantly, all we're talking about is basics. T/O and landing, simple air work and solo.

The solution to a USAF pilot shortage doesn't lie in making the holes in the filter larger during training. It's about the leadership, culture and ops tempo that's driving away the quality pilots that made it through the program.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommutAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
Tweetdrvr
Military
7
06-28-2014 09:21 AM
SF340guy
Union Talk
92
06-12-2011 06:30 PM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices