Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

ULA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2016, 04:49 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default ULA

How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon spending - POLITICO
iceman49 is offline  
Old 05-15-2016, 09:27 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,269
Default

There were legit reasons related to defense-industrial base support to allow the creation of ULA. But now there appear to be other options.

The big issue here is that the DoD awarded a large long-term contract to ULA just as SpaceX was on the verge of qualifying as a competitive bidder. The justification was cost savings in a bulk buy but there are obvious questions as to whether they should have waited to allow SpaceX to participate, or whether there was collusion to seal the deal in time to exclude them.

But all the hype aside, space launch is a critical capability and SpaceX has not proven that they can do it reliably yet so caution is in order. It's possible that spaceX could put ULA out of the launch business, but then you'd be single-point safe on their system. ULA was intentionally structured to use two independent launch systems (Atlas & Delta)...without ULA, boeing and lockmart would have had to compete against each other and it would not have been sustainable for both so you would have again ended up with only one system.

The inherent problem is critical capability with such a limited market and customer base that you have to ensure that competition doesn't render the business non-sustainable. Tough to manage.
rickair7777 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices