Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Military Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2016, 05:41 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 19
Default Military Options

Hi all, I am about to begin my senior year at a large aviation university. I am a commercial aviation major and will have CPL AMEL/ASEL + CFI/I when I graduate. Up to this point my plan was always to go the flight instruction to regional route. Recently I have begun to reconsider however. The chance to serve and experience the type of flying that the military does is starting to appeal to me. Like everyone else, my preference is fighters if I can make it, but flying multi engine heavies would also be fine. Helicopters also have a certain appeal, but my ultimate goal is the major airlines. I have several questions about the ANG, USAF and USN. Firstly the air guard.

I understand that you simply apply to the specific unit. If selected, you attend UPT and have a guaranteed airframe, correct?
What is the best way to be selected?
Are fighter units more competitive than airlift units?
What happens to the pilots if the unit changes missions to UAS operations?
As far as USAF and USN/Marines, what is the usual breakdown of airframes out of primary training?
And can I attend OCS with a guaranteed flight slot?
Or will I have to compete for it in some way?
Which one has a better chance of flying something with a pointy nose? And lastly as a general question, how much will my current experience help me in flight training and with selection?

Thanks for your help ahead of time! I appreciate any answers you can give me
9GulfTango is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 11:37 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Originally Posted by 9GulfTango View Post
Hi all, I am about to begin my senior year at a large aviation university. I am a commercial aviation major and will have CPL AMEL/ASEL + CFI/I when I graduate. Up to this point my plan was always to go the flight instruction to regional route. Recently I have begun to reconsider however. The chance to serve and experience the type of flying that the military does is starting to appeal to me. Like everyone else, my preference is fighters if I can make it, but flying multi engine heavies would also be fine. Helicopters also have a certain appeal, but my ultimate goal is the major airlines. I have several questions about the ANG, USAF and USN. Firstly the air guard.

I understand that you simply apply to the specific unit. If selected, you attend UPT and have a guaranteed airframe, correct?

Yes.
What is the best way to be selected?

Go to Baseops and read up on the UPT selection process. Best bet is to visit units you want to join on their open house/pilot board events

Are fighter units more competitive than airlift units?
Typically, hell yes.
What happens to the pilots if the unit changes missions to UAS operations?
It depends. You are probably ****ed. Some folks may follow the jets to other bases, some won't

As far as USAF and USN/Marines, what is the usual breakdown of airframes out of primary training?
I will defer to my Gold Winged brethren

And can I attend OCS with a guaranteed flight slot?
Yes. More importantly I would not attend without one

Or will I have to compete for it in some way?
If unit sponsors you the slot is yours. If you ignore my advice above and join Active duty, at times there are slots available you can wrestle by doing well. It depends on needs of the service at the time. I wouldn't go to OCS hoping for that however...
Which one has a better chance of flying something with a pointy nose?
ANG/Reserve will be your best overall shot. That said, I flew the F-15 for 15 years after flying the OV-10, and a host of my contemporaries off active duty got fighters as well. It comes down to your performance and needs of the Air Force at the time.
And lastly as a general question, how much will my current experience help me in flight training and with selection?
Any expereince will help with your selection. The debate is how much does your GA flying help in UPT. It helped me in primary, but by T-38s was a non-factor. I know a guy who went with 4000+ hours including lear time and he was DG in his C-130 track. I also know a guy who had 12 hours GA and graduated number one in my class, and later went to weapons school in the F-15C. I generally think more experience gives confidence and helps to a point, but more important is ability, adaptability, and knowing when to flush what you know to adopt the new material you are being taught.

Thanks for your help ahead of time! I appreciate any answers you can give me
Do a thread search. Lots of wannabes have asked similar questions, and there is a ton off good info (and some BS too) on these and other boards. Its a great time to go serve, and we need good guys to pick up the torch and run with it. Just don't forget you are going to be a solider with wings, not a pilot getting "checked out" in the F-16. Adopt the warrior's attitude, and you will do well in Hercs, C-17s, F-22s, or whatever you end up flying...
Albief15 is offline  
Old 08-14-2016, 08:20 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by 9GulfTango View Post
As far as USAF and USN/Marines, what is the usual breakdown of airframes out of primary training?
It varies from week to week based on needs of the Navy. My week had 4 jet slots for 10 grads but no jet slots had been awarded for 4 months prior to my class. This was 17 years ago but just want you to understand that your timing can't be predicted and you won't know what is available until the day you select. Ultimately it can end up being a crap shoot. If you have jet grades (above a rolling average over the last certain number of students) and there are jet slots your week you can select jets. If no jet slots available then you get your second or possibly third pick.

We have more tactical jets than other aircraft, but those Helos/Maritime platforms have 2-3 pilots in them so the numbers always seemed to be about the same.

Keep in mind if you go Navy or USMC then your first opportunity to go to the reserves will be about 10 years after your commissioning day. Local CFIs are getting their hours an into the regionals in under 12 months (90-110 hrs/month).

The only reason to serve right now (my opinion) is if you have some type of internal calling to serve your country AND experience tactical flying. The flying is fun but it dries up after 1-2 tours on active duty and the BS can quickly outweigh the adventure.

Just wanted to offer my 2 cents since your stated goal was Major Airline. USN time may push you on to the backside of the hiring wave.
FlewNavy is offline  
Old 08-15-2016, 08:55 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sourdough44's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: Left
Posts: 636
Default

With the right planning/prep, testing and such you can go in with a guaranty of flight training, providing you pass all the steps along the way, including medical. There is no guarantee of outcome, that's one part that keeps you on your toes.

When I started with the Navy in 85 I had no clue or intention with an airline job, my goals were right in front of me. That ended up being almost 2.5 years, from AOCS in Pensacola to deployment on the USS AMERICA. The airline thing came years later.

One needs a lot of motivation to go through a military flight program and then the 8+ years that follow. If one is looking to just get an airline pilot career started, I'd look to the regionals. On the flip side, with the military flying you will be exposed to stuff you won't find anywhere else.

That said, there's no way I would trade my military time for a 5-7 yr earlier seniority number(factoring in some regional time). One could easily spend 6+ years at a reigional before highly competitive for an interview at a major, depending.

A flight slot at a Guard/Reserve unit may be the best of both worlds. Getting that slot can take some ingenuity on the applicants part.
sourdough44 is offline  
Old 08-15-2016, 09:48 AM
  #5  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 19
Default

To make my motivations clear, it is tactical/military flying that appeals to me. The military wouldn't be a time builder, it would be my job until the time is right to move on. The guard/reserve looks like a great deal, but very competitive. Active duty seems like a better chance of getting the aircraft i want, but then I am looking at a 10 year sentence if I get rotary or something else I don't want. What I have learned in my investigation is that there are no easy answers!
9GulfTango is offline  
Old 08-15-2016, 10:50 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by 9GulfTango View Post
To make my motivations clear, it is tactical/military flying that appeals to me. The military wouldn't be a time builder, it would be my job until the time is right to move on. The guard/reserve looks like a great deal, but very competitive. Active duty seems like a better chance of getting the aircraft i want, but then I am looking at a 10 year sentence if I get rotary or something else I don't want. What I have learned in my investigation is that there are no easy answers!
And that will be an attitude that you will not want to show to your IPs or fellow students, and eventually your squadron mates.

I went through with people who were 110% tactically motivated (meaning they wanted jets). Talk to them a few years later and most are in love with their airframe and mission. EVERY aspect of military flying has its own set of challenges and amazing flying - from maneuvering the airplane every which way to traveling to 100s of airports (and some times not airports) all over the world!

Every branch and every airframe will give you experiences which will benefit you later in life if you decide that you want to be a professional pilot. Even if you get helos (), your second tour could be flying trainers and building fixed wing time and you'll have some great stories to tell.

Speaking of *military* flying - - -they obviously do a lot of HomeLand Security missions right now - but I fly with a handful of former USCG guys and I'm totally in awe of some of the missions they flew. I'm a huge fan of the Coasties and wish I had been given an opportunity to transition at some point after I got to 'do my job' in the USMC.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 08-15-2016, 12:15 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 376
Default Needs of the service

If you go active you must embrace the concept that at every turn ITS NOT ABOUT YOU. Every door that opens or closes is based on the needs of the service.

That being said - I don't know of anyone that hated their assigned platform. I have flown props, light jets, helos, tactical jets and heavy prop aircraft and I think flying helos was the most "fun" followed by day carrier landings. Fighter maneuvers was challenging but not the "fun" I thought it would be. (About as physically hard as boxing out of your weight class). Low level Ops was "Fun". Probably the most rewarding was teaching and leading large formations and tactical elements. But you might get assigned the C2 greyhound which is not sexy but gives your more port calls than you can count and no night traps.
FlewNavy is offline  
Old 08-17-2016, 06:22 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 233
Default

Tacair guy, but like the guy above I have flown other mil aircraft (helos, props, etc). Helos are probably the most fun, from a flying perspective and the most challenging. I'd still take jets knowing what I know now. That being said take a look at the culture of the services and figure out which fits you best. I didn't, but was lucky enough to get into the service that I fit best with. You will spend a good part of your life with them, it will be better if they think like you.

Timing is everything in the Navy and Marine Corps for jets. Though you do have to do your part and if you do really well they will try to help you. When I went through I heard guys complaining about no jet slots, and later found out no one had jet grades. I know of at least one Navy guy in my time frame they sat because he did well and got a jet slot. Also, I know of several Marines who did not want jets but barely made the cut and were forced jets.
andrewtac is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Dave Behnke
Cargo
109
08-27-2014 01:45 PM
turboprop87
Regional
17
08-13-2014 05:49 PM
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
SkyHigh
Major
99
10-30-2006 07:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices