Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
The true definition of "Solo" flight >

The true definition of "Solo" flight

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

The true definition of "Solo" flight

Old 05-25-2007, 06:02 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldveedubs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: pǝʇɹǝʌuı
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups View Post
You can be the only one in the plane. If you're a student pilot, it's illegal to have anyone else in the plane. (and unethical, I think)(and the insurance company wouldn't pay)(and if you were my student, I'd drop you like rock).

There is something about logging solo in a twin even though your CFI is onboard, I think, for insurance reasons.
I'm pretty sure if a student pilot did that your ticket would be in jeopardy so you could "drop them like a rock"....but prob still have some issues with Miss Marion.

I've heard of the 2nd topic you've mentioned...from what I understand it is called a "supervised solo"...more or less ridiculous if you ask me.
oldveedubs is offline  
Old 05-25-2007, 07:39 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
XcalibeR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by MikeInTx View Post
I have heard a few commercial students as well as a CFI at my school mention that during their commercial training when they were supposed to be on solo cross countries, they stopped and picked up friends/family at small airstrips along the route...is this technically against the rules?
To answer your last question first, yes, it's against the rules, if they logged it as solo. Solo, as was answered before, is all the time where the pilot was the only person onboard the aircraft. So they could log the initial part of the flight as solo, but then the part with passengers as only PIC. Which, for a commercial, is just as good as solo (With the exception of the flight for 61.129(a)(4))

Also as was said before, it's really only used for student pilots. With that in mind, though, FAA Form 8710 (Application for an airman certificate) has spaces for "solo", "cross country solo" with separate columns for PIC time. So even if you have your private, you would need to figure out your total solo times if you ever apply for another certificate or rating. It really sucks, especially if the PIC and Solo columns in your logbook are the same (this I know from experience. grrrrr...)
XcalibeR is offline  
Old 05-25-2007, 10:05 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by XcalibeR View Post
To answer your last question first, yes, it's against the rules, if they logged it as solo. Solo, as was answered before, is all the time where the pilot was the only person onboard the aircraft. So they could log the initial part of the flight as solo, but then the part with passengers as only PIC. Which, for a commercial, is just as good as solo (With the exception of the flight for 61.129(a)(4))

Also as was said before, it's really only used for student pilots. With that in mind, though, FAA Form 8710 (Application for an airman certificate) has spaces for "solo", "cross country solo" with separate columns for PIC time. So even if you have your private, you would need to figure out your total solo times if you ever apply for another certificate or rating. It really sucks, especially if the PIC and Solo columns in your logbook are the same (this I know from experience. grrrrr...)
Ummm...maybe I am not understanding what you wrote but I have done much training since my PPL to include ATP and 4 types. I've never logged any solo beyond my student pilot time and it's never been a problem. This includes my F-16 time which is solo 99.69% of the time.

Bottom line, don't log solo after your PPL unless your training towards Gliders or Rotary Wing aircraft. Nobody cares if you are by yourself once you are rated.
Slice is offline  
Old 05-26-2007, 04:24 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Slice View Post
Sorry, I was referring to post # 1. My point being (PhantomAir)if you already have a PPL there's no reason to ever use the solo column to log time in powered fixed wing airplanes.
Aeronautical experience required for the commercial pilot certificate states that you need 10 hours of SOLO FLIGHT TIME which consists of the long cross country and night flight with 10 takeoffs and landing. That would be 61.129 (a)(4) if you want to see the actual verbiage.

But I do agree that there is no reason to put it in the solo column of the log book. I just made a notation in the remarks so that I could show the examiner where each of these qualifying flights were in my logbook.
skirtinstorms is offline  
Old 05-26-2007, 09:26 AM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

Originally Posted by MikeInTx View Post
I have heard a few commercial students as well as a CFI at my school mention that during their commercial training when they were supposed to be on solo cross countries, they stopped and picked up friends/family at small airstrips along the route...is this technically against the rules?

It depends. Talking part 61, you need 250 hours, including 20 hours of commercial dual, and 10 hours of solo. The remaining 230 hours (minus what you had from PPL training) can be either dual OR solo.

If you are just building time solo cuz it's cheaper than having a cfi along, you can legally take pax...UNLESS you are logging that flight towards the actual required 10 hours solo, or the required solo XC or night pattern work. The flight school may or may not be cool with it, but it's FAA legal as long as you did the required solo flying by yourself.

Basically if you take PAX or a CFI, don't log solo.

Exception: If you are doing your initial commercial in a twin, you can bring your instructor along for the "solo" work as long as you perform the PIC duties.

Slice: you do need some solo time for the commercial, but after that I can't think of any reason to log it either. If you converted your military rating to a commercial you may not have known that.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CubCAPTAIN
Regional
94
02-17-2007 09:37 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
02-10-2007 08:29 PM
toeman9
Flight Schools and Training
19
09-28-2006 01:54 PM
UNDGUY
Hiring News
10
09-26-2006 02:56 PM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
07-22-2005 09:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices