Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Rate/Radius of Turn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2010, 08:03 PM
  #51  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by ryan1234 View Post
A coordinated turn has no sideforce..
I think that you and the OP were using this term in a slightly different way. The normal use of the term is the fuselage side force that acts along the lateral axis, which occurs when the aircraft is yawed with respect to the relative wind. This is why a slipping turn has poor turning performance, because the fuselage side force acts opposite the centripetal force needed for the turn.

I think this is how you were using the term.

The OP was mainly concerned with the lift on the vertical stabilizer that will keep the airplane yawing with the turn. Without rudder, there will be a slight sideslip that will act to weathervane the aircraft into the relative wind and the OP was referring to this as the side force. And it would be, if the pilot didn't use rudder to compensate. The deflected rudder changes the camber on the vertical stabilizer so that it generates lift at a zero AoA, producing the required yawing force with no sideslip.

BTW, another way of saying no side force is that the apparent gravity inside the airplane will lie in the plane of symmetry. With the side force, it would be tilted slightly and there would be a component of this force along the lateral axis, producing the familiar sliding of the passengers toward either the inside or outside of the turn.
gesres is offline  
Old 02-12-2010, 08:30 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by gesres View Post
I think that you and the OP were using this term in a slightly different way. The normal use of the term is the fuselage side force that acts along the lateral axis, which occurs when the aircraft is yawed with respect to the relative wind. This is why a slipping turn has poor turning performance, because the fuselage side force acts opposite the centripetal force needed for the turn.

I think this is how you were using the term.

The OP was mainly concerned with the lift on the vertical stabilizer that will keep the airplane yawing with the turn. Without rudder, there will be a slight sideslip that will act to weathervane the aircraft into the relative wind and the OP was referring to this as the side force. And it would be, if the pilot didn't use rudder to compensate. The deflected rudder changes the camber on the vertical stabilizer so that it generates lift at a zero AoA, producing the required yawing force with no sideslip.

BTW, another way of saying no side force is that the apparent gravity inside the airplane will lie in the plane of symmetry. With the side force, it would be tilted slightly and there would be a component of this force along the lateral axis, producing the familiar sliding of the passengers toward either the inside or outside of the turn.
Ok, I think this is all coming together a bit better... thanks for your addition and welcome to APC.

So...hopefully I'm understanding this all right: Whenever an aircraft rolls, there is a sideforce generated on the vertical stabilizer on any points that are not on the 'roll axis' from a side-velocity.. which is called 'sideforce due to roll rate'. The yaw rate of the turn also contributes to a sideforce, because the surfaces aft of the CG may not be balanced with the forces forward than the CG. This is called 'sideforce due to yaw rate'. The rudder controls (neutralizes) this side force with a side force of its own.

Because the rudder neutralizes the side-force, the side force is equal to zero (almost) in a coordinated turn.

There is also a gravitational component of sideforce whenever the aircraft is banked, however it acts through the CG so no yawing or rolling motions are produced.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 02-13-2010, 11:15 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by gesres View Post
Originally Posted by gestrich19
So according to this reference, the aircraft is basically moving around the axis that is in between the vertical and lateral axis?
Hmmm, I had to think about that one, but yes, I think you could invent a new axis for that.
Just seeing if I am on the same visual page, but would you consider this *invented* axis to be the one perpendicular to the horizontal component of lift? That is an axis that would point straight up and down regardless of aircraft orientation.

My apologies to gestrich19, it seems I didn't have this down as well as I had thought/hoped I did.
shdw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EnglishmaninNY
Technical
12
01-16-2011 12:20 PM
DaRaiders
Cargo
2
01-29-2009 01:19 PM
Pecan
Cargo
0
01-06-2009 12:06 PM
USMCFLYR
Flight Schools and Training
19
09-07-2008 05:36 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
0
08-24-2008 12:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices