Rate/Radius of Turn
#51
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 11
I think that you and the OP were using this term in a slightly different way. The normal use of the term is the fuselage side force that acts along the lateral axis, which occurs when the aircraft is yawed with respect to the relative wind. This is why a slipping turn has poor turning performance, because the fuselage side force acts opposite the centripetal force needed for the turn.
I think this is how you were using the term.
The OP was mainly concerned with the lift on the vertical stabilizer that will keep the airplane yawing with the turn. Without rudder, there will be a slight sideslip that will act to weathervane the aircraft into the relative wind and the OP was referring to this as the side force. And it would be, if the pilot didn't use rudder to compensate. The deflected rudder changes the camber on the vertical stabilizer so that it generates lift at a zero AoA, producing the required yawing force with no sideslip.
BTW, another way of saying no side force is that the apparent gravity inside the airplane will lie in the plane of symmetry. With the side force, it would be tilted slightly and there would be a component of this force along the lateral axis, producing the familiar sliding of the passengers toward either the inside or outside of the turn.
I think this is how you were using the term.
The OP was mainly concerned with the lift on the vertical stabilizer that will keep the airplane yawing with the turn. Without rudder, there will be a slight sideslip that will act to weathervane the aircraft into the relative wind and the OP was referring to this as the side force. And it would be, if the pilot didn't use rudder to compensate. The deflected rudder changes the camber on the vertical stabilizer so that it generates lift at a zero AoA, producing the required yawing force with no sideslip.
BTW, another way of saying no side force is that the apparent gravity inside the airplane will lie in the plane of symmetry. With the side force, it would be tilted slightly and there would be a component of this force along the lateral axis, producing the familiar sliding of the passengers toward either the inside or outside of the turn.
#52
I think that you and the OP were using this term in a slightly different way. The normal use of the term is the fuselage side force that acts along the lateral axis, which occurs when the aircraft is yawed with respect to the relative wind. This is why a slipping turn has poor turning performance, because the fuselage side force acts opposite the centripetal force needed for the turn.
I think this is how you were using the term.
The OP was mainly concerned with the lift on the vertical stabilizer that will keep the airplane yawing with the turn. Without rudder, there will be a slight sideslip that will act to weathervane the aircraft into the relative wind and the OP was referring to this as the side force. And it would be, if the pilot didn't use rudder to compensate. The deflected rudder changes the camber on the vertical stabilizer so that it generates lift at a zero AoA, producing the required yawing force with no sideslip.
BTW, another way of saying no side force is that the apparent gravity inside the airplane will lie in the plane of symmetry. With the side force, it would be tilted slightly and there would be a component of this force along the lateral axis, producing the familiar sliding of the passengers toward either the inside or outside of the turn.
I think this is how you were using the term.
The OP was mainly concerned with the lift on the vertical stabilizer that will keep the airplane yawing with the turn. Without rudder, there will be a slight sideslip that will act to weathervane the aircraft into the relative wind and the OP was referring to this as the side force. And it would be, if the pilot didn't use rudder to compensate. The deflected rudder changes the camber on the vertical stabilizer so that it generates lift at a zero AoA, producing the required yawing force with no sideslip.
BTW, another way of saying no side force is that the apparent gravity inside the airplane will lie in the plane of symmetry. With the side force, it would be tilted slightly and there would be a component of this force along the lateral axis, producing the familiar sliding of the passengers toward either the inside or outside of the turn.
So...hopefully I'm understanding this all right: Whenever an aircraft rolls, there is a sideforce generated on the vertical stabilizer on any points that are not on the 'roll axis' from a side-velocity.. which is called 'sideforce due to roll rate'. The yaw rate of the turn also contributes to a sideforce, because the surfaces aft of the CG may not be balanced with the forces forward than the CG. This is called 'sideforce due to yaw rate'. The rudder controls (neutralizes) this side force with a side force of its own.
Because the rudder neutralizes the side-force, the side force is equal to zero (almost) in a coordinated turn.
There is also a gravitational component of sideforce whenever the aircraft is banked, however it acts through the CG so no yawing or rolling motions are produced.
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
My apologies to gestrich19, it seems I didn't have this down as well as I had thought/hoped I did.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EnglishmaninNY
Technical
12
01-16-2011 12:20 PM