Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Part 135 Part 135 airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2008, 07:56 AM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Instrument Rated Commercial Student
Posts: 27
Default Small Part 135 operators

Hello, I'm a new member and brand new pilot. My goal is to instruct and fly charter part-time. Realisticly I would like to instruct locally and fly in a ME aircraft for a charter company. If a company is operating a piston ME aircraft and fly with a SIC, what hours realisticly would they look for in a SIC pilot. Also, realisticly are there many operations flying twin piston aircraft with a SIC? I'm also kind of assuming that my first flying job outside of instruting would be the right seat of a twin piston. Is it realistic to expect/look for/want to fly right seat in a twin piston? Thanks for everyones time,

safe flying
sellener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 12:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: BE99 Captain
Posts: 62
Default

Might be worth it to spend a few bucks on climbto350.com to get an idea of what companies are looking for, and willing to pay.
own nav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 12:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: BE-10A
Posts: 63
Default

sellener,

what kind of hours do you have and what's your location?

Ryan
RyanSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 12:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
Doesn't really work
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Piston/Turbine Props....not just for boats!
Posts: 1,765
Default

For all this to happen, I assume you're living in or around a larger metropolitian area. Flight instructing part is probably the easiest to get, seeing how there seems to be an abundance of these jobs, but for how long, I don't know.

As far as the 135 side, this is sticky. Contacts/connections with someone if you're low time, and low-time for me as far as a commercial pilot position is less than 1000 hrs. There are operators that use 2 pilots in twin-piston planes, mainly C421's, C414's, PA31's, and occasionally the lighter Be58's and C310's. Most likely a lot of these "positions" are going to be very low pay, and you're there for the sake of Insurance, not FAA reasons.

99% of these you will not be legal to log the SIC time, because all of these planes are single-pilot approved, and I'm almost 100% guarantee'd that they have an autopilot, so even 135 they don't need the SIC. You can log any 91 legs assuming you have all endorsements including High-Perf, High-Alt, etc..(421s'/414's require high-alt endorsement).

So "realistically" speaking, looking for these positions as a way to get your foot in the door, is not a bad way to do it, but it's not always the easiest of ways. I do think it offers some real-world experience if you can get into something of this nature because you can see how the pro's do it on a day-to-day basis. It will not be a good source of income in most situations, unless turbine equipement is involved, and also a lower time-building venture as well, but I feel in this case it's "quality" vs. "quantity" of hours that really matter.
__________________
Opinions have been known to cause headaches, nausea, and vomiting
Ewfflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 08:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: C56X, left seat
Posts: 108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewfflyer View Post
99% of these you will not be legal to log the SIC time, because all of these planes are single-pilot approved, and I'm almost 100% guarantee'd that they have an autopilot, so even 135 they don't need the SIC. You can log any 91 legs assuming you have all endorsements including High-Perf, High-Alt, etc..(421s'/414's require high-alt endorsement).

I don't believe it matters that they have an autopilot. Two pilots are required under pt. 135 for IFR. An exception to the rule is made if there is an operating, approved autopilot, and in this case one pilot is allowed. Doesn't mean that two pilots are NOT allowed.
ppilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 09:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
the King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: JS32 FO
Posts: 742
Default

Yeah, that's an OpSpec you can get, but in general, I'd say charter customers probably feel more comfortable with two pilots.

There are companies that will hire you with less than 135 PIC mins, but you have to meet people. I should know, since I'm employed by such a company. But I never would have gotten the job if I hadn't talked to the CP for 30 minutes at a job fair. Most of my fellow instructors talked to the airlines, but my buddy and I talked to the 135 outfit. We both got called, the others have run into the downturn at the airlines. A matter of timing and choices is status quo in this industry.
__________________
More people are killed by donkeys than in airplane crashes each year....
the King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 06:49 AM   #7 (permalink)
Doesn't really work
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Piston/Turbine Props....not just for boats!
Posts: 1,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ppilot View Post
I don't believe it matters that they have an autopilot. Two pilots are required under pt. 135 for IFR. An exception to the rule is made if there is an operating, approved autopilot, and in this case one pilot is allowed. Doesn't mean that two pilots are NOT allowed.

Basically any mid-light twin w/ an approved autopilot(I'd say 100% of them that are used for hauling pax), then you're not required an SIC. Some Ops specs have special wording approved by their FSDO to use an SIC, and let that SIC log that time pending check-rides etc....

I never said you can't put a second pilot in that seat, I'm just saying that they can't log the time unless there's a provision for that. SIC in a baron/C310 isn't going to impress anyone, but for the purpose of building time to get onto that companies roster once you hit the 1200TT.
__________________
Opinions have been known to cause headaches, nausea, and vomiting
Ewfflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 07:49 AM   #8 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ppilot View Post
I don't believe it matters that they have an autopilot. Two pilots are required under pt. 135 for IFR. An exception to the rule is made if there is an operating, approved autopilot, and in this case one pilot is allowed. Doesn't mean that two pilots are NOT allowed.
According to 61.51, you can not log SIC time unless the SIC is required. Having an autopilot dis-requires the SIC, so you can not log it. You are certainly allowed to sit there and even perform the duties of an SIC, but since you aren't required, you cant log SIC.

But then again, it's your logbook. Log whatever you want.
friendlyskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 12:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
Doesn't really work
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Piston/Turbine Props....not just for boats!
Posts: 1,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by friendlyskies View Post
According to 61.51, you can not log SIC time unless the SIC is required. Having an autopilot dis-requires the SIC, so you can not log it. You are certainly allowed to sit there and even perform the duties of an SIC, but since you aren't required, you cant log SIC.

But then again, it's your logbook. Log whatever you want.
That's what I was looking for, but didn't have my FAR/AIM with me!
__________________
Opinions have been known to cause headaches, nausea, and vomiting
Ewfflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 01:52 PM   #10 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Ex-CMR
Posts: 30
Default

That's why alot of companies disable the auto-pilot, so the SICs can log their time... Pencil whip baby! lol
Adobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/part-135/28786-small-part-135-operators.html
Posted By For Type Date
Part 135 on Airline Pilot Central Forums | BoardReader This thread Refback 07-23-2008 09:40 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polar Route? Bloodhound Fractional 14 03-10-2008 04:57 PM
Chicago Part 135 Operators? FlyingCheap Part 135 2 01-09-2008 01:21 PM
Any of you guys still flight instruct? N618FT Regional 34 11-19-2007 08:28 AM
Part 135 operators Niner Part 135 5 10-28-2007 10:17 PM
Part 135 VFR operators out of Vegas/Phoenix.... cfii2007 Part 135 12 10-14-2007 05:10 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7