Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Operating Costs for Piper Chieftain >

Operating Costs for Piper Chieftain

Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Operating Costs for Piper Chieftain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2009, 09:59 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
cpatterson19's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 78
Smile Operating Costs for Piper Chieftain

I have a project I am working on that could possibly become an operational part 135 start up. We are looking at the Piper Chieftain as a possible aircraft as well as the cessnas.

Does anyone have any idea the hourly cost for the cheiftain or even the cessna. So far my research has put it just around $330 - $400/hr. Is this a realistic range? We are open to suggestions.

Also as a part 135 On demand can you also have a shedule with destinations you plan to run or would that be a different 135 cert???
cpatterson19 is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:31 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: BE-1900 CA
Posts: 72
Default

Is that wet or dry? If dry, that sounds about right. Wet, add a hundred twenty or so, depending on fuel prices.

I've been told that 402s are cheaper on the MX, but that's just word from someone who misses flying the 402, so... yeah.
TangoBar is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:54 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
cpatterson19's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 78
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by TangoBar View Post
Is that wet or dry? If dry, that sounds about right. Wet, add a hundred twenty or so, depending on fuel prices.

I've been told that 402s are cheaper on the MX, but that's just word from someone who misses flying the 402, so... yeah.
That is dry calculation. We will be the owners of the aircraft and will be incharge of the fuel and mx and all that other good stuff that comes with a part 135 op.
cpatterson19 is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 04:52 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laxrox43's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: A320/321 FO
Posts: 1,114
Default

Where's your operation going to be out of? If you are around the east coast, or Las Vegas, look into contract "shuttle" flying with the casinos.

All 135 flights can be done on the same certificate. However, you have to have ops specs for all the different types of operation that your company will do. Also, for each operation, different work rules apply.
Laxrox43 is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 04:58 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Our operating cost including everything is 375 wet at 2.95/g
Natlaircharters is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 05:33 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Default

I think the TBO is 2000 hrs and 2 overhauled engines will run about $92-$95k/pair. You can plan on some cylinders along the way, too. The fuel burn is about 40-45 gph.

Get the BLR vg STC. I think it gives you an additional 368 lb useful load.
deadstick35 is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 09:39 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
cpatterson19's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 78
Default

The operation plans to be a mid atlantic and east coast operation. it will be slightly different from the traditional 135's around so alot of work is being put in and Ops specs and all the icing on the cake.

There are a few thinkgs I liked about the Cheiftain and that is comfort, configuration and for some reason from a recent personal survey it seems the cheiftain comes in 2nd behind the king air in pax choice.

Ofcourse I am lookign more for affordability and the size of the operation.

I know a few pilots who have time in the aircraft spoke about a method they fly that saved a considerable amount of fuel. I am yet to see it. Does anyone know anything about this? Somethign about the manifold pressure and RPM
cpatterson19 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 08:24 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 'Bus Driver Right Seat
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by cpatterson19 View Post
The operation plans to be a mid atlantic and east coast operation. it will be slightly different from the traditional 135's around so alot of work is being put in and Ops specs and all the icing on the cake.

There are a few thinkgs I liked about the Cheiftain and that is comfort, configuration and for some reason from a recent personal survey it seems the cheiftain comes in 2nd behind the king air in pax choice.

Ofcourse I am lookign more for affordability and the size of the operation.

I know a few pilots who have time in the aircraft spoke about a method they fly that saved a considerable amount of fuel. I am yet to see it. Does anyone know anything about this? Somethign about the manifold pressure and RPM
We would fly our Chieftains at 75 rich of peak at I believe 26". down from 30". There was a considerable drop in airspeed (about 15-20 knots). But we were told we were saving money on gas, but I was never sure because of the drop in airspeed we were in the air longer. We went to the richer side of peak also because we were getting cracked cylinders at the higher operating temps.
freightdog is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 11:43 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Scooter2525's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Fixed wing, left
Posts: 434
Default

Originally Posted by freightdog View Post
We would fly our Chieftains at 75 rich of peak at I believe 26". down from 30". There was a considerable drop in airspeed (about 15-20 knots). But we were told we were saving money on gas, but I was never sure because of the drop in airspeed we were in the air longer. We went to the richer side of peak also because we were getting cracked cylinders at the higher operating temps.

26" 2300 rpm at 75 degrees rich of peak will get you about 18 GPH a side and around 145-150 KIAS.
Scooter2525 is offline  
Old 03-15-2009, 12:33 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 717 FO
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by freightdog View Post
We would fly our Chieftains at 75 rich of peak at I believe 26". down from 30". There was a considerable drop in airspeed (about 15-20 knots). But we were told we were saving money on gas, but I was never sure because of the drop in airspeed we were in the air longer. We went to the richer side of peak also because we were getting cracked cylinders at the higher operating temps.
Wow, that seems really lean and low on the power. I used to fly them at 33" and 2400 RPM at 200 F rich of peak which would normally give me around 50 gph, but I was flying on demand cargo at the time so time was much more important than the extra fuel burn.
FR8DWGIE is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsled
Major
6
03-16-2009 03:01 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices