Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2009, 06:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reserveslob View Post
This is true, but the Turbin' Suburban burns Jet-A which I believe is a little cheaper than 100LL. From what I have heard, the operating cost of the Van is close to that of a Baron per mile and quite a few cents cheaper than the Sloppy Jo. Every bird has its niche. I wouldn't think the caravan will replace the chieftain in all routes but I believe it will work nicely for most routes a chieftain would fly.
I was fed that kool aid as well, but when you get one bag with 20# in the back, adding a cycle and all of that jet fuel to get maybe 175 knots doesn't make sense to me.

-mini
minitour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 12:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
propjunkie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: BE99 CA
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by minitour View Post
Eh...the van will definitely carry more stuff/people, but the navajo (or chieftain variant even) has the 2nd engine and burns less fuel.

-mini
Chieftain is faster to.
propjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 03:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
reserveslob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: BE-58, Pa-31-350, C-208 PIC
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by minitour View Post
I was fed that kool aid as well, but when you get one bag with 20# in the back, adding a cycle and all of that jet fuel to get maybe 175 knots doesn't make sense to me.

-mini
God I love koolaid! I like you said, am just drinking training department koolaid, but do you have cost numbers that support the chief over the van? Would it be better/cheaper to have the 20lb bag in the chief? I am just curious cause I would have thought the chief would be a little cheaper...that is except for a weekly maint. grounding by pilots.
reserveslob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 07:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 19
Default

Having flown both for many thousands of hours, I would pick the van every time. Yes, one engine, but how many have gone down because of an engine failure? Very few..
I know of two 'ho's personally that have gone down because of a single engine failure. And guess which engine type is more likely to fail?

Oh, and the heat works better....
Lost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 05:43 AM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 137
Default

The heater works so well that you might hurt yourself if you turn it on full hot.
SpiraMirabilis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7