Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Pre-Interview
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Pre-Interview Prep, gouges, job fairs

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2008, 07:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ASA Newhire
Posts: 71
Default multi time as dual-received

I need more multi time to qualify for my regional airline of choice.

The opportunity to right seat in a King Air, flying some legs and receiving instruction from the ATP/MEI pilot is there.

All time I fly as sole manipulator can be logged as PIC time (61.51)
All time I am receiving flight instruction can be logged as flight time, which in this case would be turbine, multi-engine, BE20 flight time.

Will it be inviting problems to present this logged time as meeting the required 100 hrs of multi-engine flight time at my interview?
johnpeace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 07:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B-777-200
Posts: 2,960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnpeace View Post
Will it be inviting problems to present this logged time as meeting the required 100 hrs of multi-engine flight time at my interview?
Getting the required flight time can obviously be a challenge, however, think about this:

In an interview you can expect to be asked technical questions about all the airplanes you've flown. If you feel comfortable and qualified to act as the Pilot in Command of a King Air (i.e. safely conducting a solo cross country with pax), then log it. Also, can you discuss in detail all the aircraft systems?

If you're not comfortable with either of those, in an interview or not, log it as dual. Sounds like a great opportunity, good luck.
HSLD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 10:52 AM   #3 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnpeace View Post
I need more multi time to qualify for my regional airline of choice.

The opportunity to right seat in a King Air, flying some legs and receiving instruction from the ATP/MEI pilot is there.

Will it be inviting problems to present this logged time as meeting the required 100 hrs of multi-engine flight time at my interview?
Sounds like a good opportunity. Just be careful about receiving too much dual received. If there's no real value added from the instruction, you may want to think twice about logging it as Dual. However, you could probably log a fair number of hours of dual rec'd in the 200 and it be legitimate. As HSLD says, be familiar with the a/c. That means really memorizing the systems.
C172MQI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 12:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
rthompsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Lear F/O
Posts: 94
Default

Don't you have to be type rated in the King Air to log PIC as it is a turbine aircraft?
rthompsonjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Bowersbum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: CFI/CFI-I/MEI
Posts: 45
Default

I think max gross is right at 12,500 on the 200, so no type, . As long as you didn't go high enough to need a high altitude endorsment you could log it as dual or PIC however you see fit, but just be smart about it.
Bowersbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 05:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
rthompsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Lear F/O
Posts: 94
Default

I miss-read the FARs. I looked it up and it says turbojet not turbine so turboprops don't need a rating. (61.31)
rthompsonjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:12 AM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
coldpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: ATR-72 FO
Posts: 506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowersbum View Post
I think max gross is right at 12,500 on the 200, so no type, . As long as you didn't go high enough to need a high altitude endorsment you could log it as dual or PIC however you see fit, but just be smart about it.
The high altitude endorsement has nothing to do with how high you actually fly, it has to do with what the aircraft is certified for. You must have the endorsement to act as PIC of a PRESSURIZED aircraft that has a service ceiling or max operating altitude above 25,000 feel MSL, whichever is lower. Check out 61.31(g). I'm don't know what the King Air 200 is certified for with respect to it's service ceiling or max operating altitude but if it is you must have this endorsement to act as PIC.
__________________
Asking what a pilot thinks about the FAA is like asking a fire hydrant what it thinks about dogs.
coldpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
iflyabeech's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 65
Default

Acting PIC and logging PIC are two different things.

You cannot act as PIC in a tailwheel, complex, high altitude, or high performance a/c until you have received training and an endorsement from an authorized instructor.

You can log the time flown before the endorsement as PIC according to part 61. Check out the 61 regs and notice the difference between endorsements and ratings! Hope this helps!

Last edited by iflyabeech : 01-07-2008 at 08:18 AM. Reason: added a little info!
iflyabeech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:41 AM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
coldpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: ATR-72 FO
Posts: 506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iflyabeech View Post
Acting PIC and logging PIC are two different things.

You cannot act as PIC in a tailwheel, complex, high altitude, or high performance a/c until you have received training and an endorsement from an authorized instructor.

You can log the time flown before the endorsement as PIC according to part 61. Check out the 61 regs and notice the difference between endorsements and ratings! Hope this helps!
You can not log it unless you have the endorsement! Period! Read 61.51(e)(1)(i) again. Here I will paste it for you.

61.51
(e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time. (1) A sport, recreational, private, or commercial pilot may log pilot-in-command time only for that flight time during which that person—

(i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated or has privileges;

You must have the endorsement which grants "privileges" to operate the aircraft as PIC. Furthermore, 1.1 states:

Pilot in command means the person who:

(1) Has final authority and responsibility for the operation and safety of the flight;

(2) Has been designated as pilot in command before or during the flight; and

(3) Holds the appropriate category, class, and type rating, if appropriate, for the conduct of the flight.

The way I see it, you can't log the PIC time without the high altitude endorsement. Chances are the Feds would say the same thing. Most employers want to see PIC time that falls under the definition in 1.1. You can probably get away with logging under 61.51 sole manipulator for insurance purposes.

Either way the simple answer would be to have the instructor you are flying with give you the required instruction for the high altitude endorsement so then you could log PIC time under 61.51 if you really have to have that "PIC" time in a King Air without being the real PIC. If you need further clarification just ask. Hope this helps!
__________________
Asking what a pilot thinks about the FAA is like asking a fire hydrant what it thinks about dogs.
coldpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 09:27 AM   #10 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
iflyabeech's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
61.51
(e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time. (1) A sport, recreational, private, or commercial pilot may log pilot-in-command time only for that flight time during which that person—

(i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated or has privileges.
Quote:
61.5 Certificates and Ratings listed under this part.
I do not see endorsements listed.

Its not a question of getting away with it. Its legal to log PIC time in this instance referencing 61.51 (e)(1)(i)

We are not talking about acting PIC, only logging. If you reference 61.31 (g) (1), it states that
Quote:
....no person may act as pilot in command. . . .
Notice that it does not say--" or log PIC time."

Then in FAR 1.1,
Quote:
Rating means a statement that, as a part of a certificate, sets forth special conditions, privileges, or limitations.
In other words, the rating sets the privileges, not the endorsement. Read your certificate, especially the part where is says
Quote:
name....is found to be properly qualified to exercise the priviliges of. . . .
This isn't my opinion..Its all out there!

Last edited by iflyabeech : 01-07-2008 at 09:38 AM.
iflyabeech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So, you want to be an airline pilot? captain_drew Flight Training 28 02-20-2008 12:15 PM
Pilot Job Satisfaction samiboy05 Regional 82 12-01-2007 08:37 PM
Starting to reconsider......... atpwannabe Flight Schools 46 11-25-2007 07:04 PM
Twin Time Building toeman9 Flight Training 7 08-21-2007 10:53 AM
Building Time Pylot Flight Training 3 06-14-2005 04:00 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7