Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevets
What I'm saying is the the whole reason why JA wants our Holding Letter gone is because that would required him to merge seniority lists and make SKW pilots unionized after the representation election. JA simply does not want his pilots the basic right to be organized.
|
Rights to be organized ? We have that "right" now. We've used that right; 3 times. JA is abiding by our collective wishes by protecting us from the very union that we just said no to, for the second time. The very union that USA said no to, and kicked out. And Colgan said no to. The very union that is sueing SkW in some bizarro deparate attempt to disable the pilot organization that we have (hope you enjoy your dues money being used for that).
Let me state categorically that JA will not cut any deal which will encumber SkW pilots, who have already turned down a union multiple times, to be forced into a union. Based on his comments in ORD, I'd say that the pilots of XJT will have the final word on a sale, and in my opinion, JA wins either way. Bought with his provisos, or bought at auction in pieces. Or not bought at all. But he won't hurt us.
Obviously, CAL wants to cut a better deal with XJT, or use SkW (sounds like we're moving in to CAL anyway, XJT or not). I'm not sure what the best answer for XJT is on that, but I'm sure that all the parties involved knows what's best for them. Unfortunately, the airline business is replete with examples of folks holding out until total failure.
Quote:
|
Also, ALPA did NOT spend $5.3 million on that drive. I've challenged you before on that and you've ignored it.
|
Ok, I got the number from somebody else's post. What number would you like me to use ? I don't care how much it was; it wasn't a penny of my money. How about a gazillion dollars ? Let's see, full page ad in USA Today ($150,000-ish maybe?), advertising in airports (tens of thousands), legal bills still ongoing (staff attorneys don't work for free), full time ALPA officer shacked up in SLC for the whole drive (some five figure amount), lots of free drinks and meals ($$$$$$$ thanks, by the way :-), travel expenses and hotels for organizing committee ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$). Give me a number.
Quote:
|
I agree that SKW isn't abridging your rights. Because as "at-will" employees, you don't have as many rights.
|
One thing that I've learned in my short time around the unionized airline business is that those "rights" get trampled on more times than we "at-will" employees at SkW. Makes for a good sound bite, though.
Quote:
|
SKW pilots would still be outnumbered anyways. Our Holding Letter would require seniority list integration because of the fact that SKW Inc is ONLY a holding company. That is why JA doesn't want it.
|
Ok, well we've discussed this. JA is against it, the pilots at SkW would be against it. Even if JA didn't care whether we got screwed over in the deal or not, he doesn't have to look far in the airline world to see what a mess that can be VERY quickly.
Quote:
|
I doubt that XJT pilots would be p*ssed off if the deal is good for the pilots, which it can be. Remember that the rank and file pilots would have the final say on this. If they thinks its good, they'll vote for it. If not, they'll turn it down. So if they vote for it, why would they be p*ssed?
|
That's a good point. If XJT guys vote to be integrated into a non-union list, more power to them. Yes, they should be cool with that, if that's what they choose. But I can imagine them signing off on that, only to start union drive #4 at SkW a week later.... which is fine, but frankly, I'm personally tired of the drama with that.
And if that union drive fails, what do we have ? P*ssed off union guys in our ranks.