Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2014, 07:25 AM
  #5121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: DHC-8 100/300
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by JohnGardner View Post
Btw, and I know some here get this, a flow through is designed to keep pilots at that regional longer, not to move them on quicker.
PDT has been losing guys to Atlas Blue and United as well as US the entire time the current hiring letter was signed. I bet that continues even with the flow.

How's life on the 76 at AA?
PDTpilotXX is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:08 AM
  #5122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
Yea but you could've left right? I'm mean that's 17 years you stayed at Eagle. Sounds like that was your choice.

With the big 4 carriers losing over 10,000 to retirements over the next 5 years it will move real fast. Watch in the future how hard it will be for JetBlue,Virgin, Alligaint to keep FO's.

These young guys are set! This big gap in hiring doesn't come around often.
I guarantee there will be a lot of FOs who are currently working for regionals that do not get called in the next 5 years.
Bzzt is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:20 AM
  #5123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt View Post
I guarantee there will be a lot of FOs who are currently working for regionals that do not get called in the next 5 years.
Well that would be cause a lack of trying.
billyho is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 08:47 AM
  #5124  
patience
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt View Post
I guarantee there will be a lot of FOs who are currently working for regionals that do not get called in the next 5 years.
Maybe if those FOs never get some captain experience.
Systemized is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:00 AM
  #5125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by JohnGardner View Post
In 1997 eagle said I'd be at American in five years. I'm in new hire training today. Hmm....

I doubt 175s at PDT too.

That is pretty dubious to post that without taking into context what happened in those 5 years. In '01 ( 4 years into your 5) 9/11 happened. The industry furloughed thousands, combine that furlough with the increase in retirement age to 65 and that is the reason you are just now in class. You should be very well aware that advancement predictions are only accurate in a vacuum. Once a world event or a corporate event (BK) happens all bets are off.

My airline has always been "hiring for the foreseeable future" right up to the day they furlough.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:01 AM
  #5126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Systemized, Then move to where you can get you upgrade to get that captain experience. It is a free country here in the USA for now.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:16 AM
  #5127  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by JohnGardner View Post
In 1997 eagle said I'd be at American in five years. I'm in new hire training today. Hmm....

I doubt 175s at PDT too.
In regards to the possibility of 175s to piedmont, How will that fit into the current route structure with most of there legs around 30 minutes long. Is there a need for 70 seats on existing routes?
prop1900 is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:44 AM
  #5128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
higgi8f6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DHC-8
Posts: 150
Default

So I ask some hypothetical questions since we have yet to see the TA. I'm currently on the fence at PDT about this TA. You can sit here and tell me to hold the line and all other BS but no regional is in the same situation Piedmont is currently in. Republic and ExpressJet are both locked into multi-year contracts with the majors. Envoy has equipment that will be around for years to come and leases that can be extended. Piedmont has at best 2-3 years. We park 1 plane in 2016 and in the first quarter of 2017 we are scheduled to park 4 or 5 with a few more being parked later that year. Currently Piedmont staffs about 8 pilots per aircraft so in 2017 we will no longer require at least 15% of our workforce or about 50 pilots. There are no options to extend leases or anything like that. We will park aircraft because they have reached their cycle limit.

Now I'm not excited about a 12/4 cap because it took me 7 years to upgrade ,however is it a concession to accept a 12/4 where you reach the top amount faster and the hourly rate is consistent with what you top out after 20/8 currently? Let's say our 12 year cap is still higher than other carriers who top out after 20 years? Same for FOs? It may not be industry leading but it is in line with industry standard? In addition, because we make more money we have a net gain on income even paying higher insurance premiums? Is this a concession? I'd be making more money and consistent with other regional carriers?

ALPAs policy has always been get the aircraft on property then negotiate upwards. With this TA we are allowed to open up QOL items i believe twice or three times during its term. That gives us the opportunity to better our contract once the aircraft are present.

Personally I wanna vote no out of spite but that is not fair to the industry and definitely not fair to the Piedmont pilot group. Emotion should not be a reason to vote one way or another. Now I personally will probably be able to get hired by a major in the next year or two but is it right to vote down a future for Piedmont? Because that is really what we are voting on. Is it fair to the FOs who are just starting or the senior guys waiting to retire? Yes they will be able to find other jobs flying but at what financial and personal costs to them? If Piedmont doesn't close they will be in a much better position.

My biggest internal struggle is that if I am still here when the term of this contract expires, will I still be happy with the way I voted. There is no easy answer.
higgi8f6 is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:05 AM
  #5129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by prop1900 View Post
In regards to the possibility of 175s to piedmont, How will that fit into the current route structure with most of there legs around 30 minutes long. Is there a need for 70 seats on existing routes?
You can't be that dumb??? Lol! The route structure is owned by American. If we get 175's it will just change like they always have for our airline. We did 2 hour flights and actually flew to about 25 cities out of CLT. Now we fly to maybe 10. But route structure can change on a dime. Look at PSA when they dumped there DoProps.
billyho is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:32 AM
  #5130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by higgi8f6 View Post
You can sit here and tell me to hold the line and all other BS but no regional is in the same situation Piedmont is currently in. Envoy has equipment that will be around for years to come and leases that can be extended.
.
Clearly you are oblivious to our situation at Envoy. We are losing bases, lost the West Coast, losing jets EVERY month now for the foreseeable future. We just lost an entire fleet of turboprops. Along with another lost domicile in Puerto Rico that many called home, pretty much the entire Caribbean was lost last year. Our routes and bases are being slowly taken over by RAH, Mesa, Skywest, Expressjet and soon PSA and Compass. We are losing routes every month to others as we park airplanes. SJU closed, LAX completely taken over, ORD whor*d out, DFW infiltrated, with more bad news coming. Our MIA and LGA flying getting whor*d out to RAH starting next month. Next it will be Piedmont also coming into our bases while we get displaced and/or downgraded if they vote that in and undercut us like PSA did.

Your situation is not "special". We are under just as great of threat of non-existance as you are. We are Comair II according to management. From their own words.

Last edited by RyanP; 08-24-2014 at 10:47 AM.
RyanP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices