Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2008, 04:00 PM   #21 (permalink)
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CE-550/560 PIC
Posts: 1,862
Default

The bottom line is the pilots of Midwest need to sign a contract with the company that includes provisions to fly the 170's... when they do the midwest pilots will fly them and the RaH guys will go home...... kinda sucks all the way around... but then..MIDWEST could just close the doors...that would suck worse....

AND I do believe that its a violation of the CBA with the RAH pilots to lease those aircraft to Midwest....... but then RAH mgt has always taken the attitude that we will do it... and you can grieve it....
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:01 PM   #22 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Killer51883's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: E-170
Posts: 413
Default

im just saying that the rah contract states that the agreement covers "the company, any subsidiary of the company, the companys parent, any subsidiary of the company's parent and any future airline certificates." It goes on to state that the company will not transfer aircraft to other airlines to evade the contract. as far as who looses flying its not good for the whole industry. Im sure republic will be used as a whipsaw for the midwest pilots and in the end the net result will be less pay for every one.
Killer51883 is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:03 PM   #23 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Gear Beotch
Posts: 93
Default

This deal is just wrong...in the short term it is Great for RAH management and pilots, in the long term it is bad for Midwest and RAH....lets hope April's fools day just came late this year!
powrful1 is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:09 PM   #24 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: rear GV
Posts: 120
Default

I hope this thing falls through for the industries sake. Republic does not look into the future it seems but makes decisions based on the next 24 hours.
DLAJ77 is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:18 PM   #25 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 2,375
Default

This deal isn't good for either pilot group. Both sides need to stand up and fight for their respective intrests.

While it might save my job in the near term (I get furloughed next Monday) I don't see this as a positive move for our group.
__________________
Frank was RIGHT!
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:18 PM   #26 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
ScaryKite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Right seat of a Chautauqua Heavy E-1 triple seventy.
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DLAJ77 View Post
I hope this thing falls through for the industries sake. Republic does not look into the future it seems but makes decisions based on the next 24 hours.
rah management, as sleazy as they are, usually don't enter into agreements like this! I think they were just so anxious to get the frontier birds I'm the air anyway they can.

I urge every Midwest and RAH pilot out there to vote this whole C.F. down!! That is if it even gets to a vote! This deal is no good for anyone involved except for the management of these two. The future ramifications of relaxing scope overshadow any sort of immediate " benefit". I'm currently throwing up in my own mouth at the idea of how our management treats our CBA. So again vote this down and call your union leadership! And if your in the local 747, put your red bagtag on! That's about our only option at this joke of an airline.
__________________
I'm allergic to Kool-Aid!
ScaryKite is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:24 PM   #27 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: rear GV
Posts: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryKite View Post
rah management, as sleazy as they are, usually don't enter into agreements like this! I think they were just so anxious to get the frontier birds I'm the air anyway they can.

I urge every Midwest and RAH pilot out there to vote this whole C.F. down!! That is if it even gets to a vote! This deal is no good for anyone involved except for the management of these two. The future ramifications of relaxing scope overshadow any sort of immediate " benefit". I'm currently throwing up in my own mouth at the idea of how our management treats our CBA. So again vote this down and call your union leadership! And if your in the local 747, put your red bagtag on! That's about our only option at this joke of an airline.

Yea i agree with you. It was a bad deal with the frontier flying and this is what they think is going to fix it??? There only hurting themselves.
DLAJ77 is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:27 PM   #28 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
flynavyj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: SATAN'S EMB
Posts: 881
Default

If the unions are able to come to an agreement with management on Midwest pilots flying 170's for midwest airlines it'd be good for midwest pilots. One of the problems i see is that currently midwest is equipping their 717's like their 170's, now, they'll have a comparable package. Hopefully, they'll negotiate better than regional salaries for the aircraft, but it might go to show all of us, that the E-170/175 is as much a mainline aircraft as the 190/95 is, and should be flown as such. Good luck to all.
__________________
-Let's Toast the Rich...With the Cocktail of Our Choice!
flynavyj is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 04:39 PM   #29 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
ScaryKite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Right seat of a Chautauqua Heavy E-1 triple seventy.
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flynavyj View Post
If the unions are able to come to an agreement with management on Midwest pilots flying 170's for midwest airlines it'd be good for midwest pilots. One of the problems i see is that currently midwest is equipping their 717's like their 170's, now, they'll have a comparable package. Hopefully, they'll negotiate better than regional salaries for the aircraft, but it might go to show all of us, that the E-170/175 is as much a mainline aircraft as the 190/95 is, and should be flown as such. Good luck to all.
I'm all for 170s going to mainline and pilots flying them for mainline rates. But if its done like this! I want no part of it! I dont want to be flying 170s for midwest undercutting the pilots as they let people go and I don't want them flying our aircraft while our guys get a thanks but no thanks kick in the pants! No matter how you look at it either RAH or midwest pilots are going to get the shaft! Unless we all take a stand!
__________________
I'm allergic to Kool-Aid!
ScaryKite is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 05:12 PM   #30 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
G-Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170 Clear Right
Posts: 495
Default

It would seem that Midwest management has put it's pilots into a corner. They are doomed if they take a crappy contract and they are doomed if they hold out past June of 2010. I can see it now, we RAH pilots are not going to be liked. All this cause of the actions of our management groups. I pray the Midwest guys get a good contract out of this. This would only make swallowing this $hit pill easier.
__________________
I see trees of green, red roses too.
G-Dog is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alaska Airlines to cut as many as 165 pilots vagabond Major 41 09-09-2008 03:19 PM
FDX - Airlines Balk at Indy Hub Bill DLax85 Cargo 3 08-30-2008 08:00 PM
The End has started- Commando Cargo 92 08-22-2008 08:57 PM
Republic/Chautauqua New Deal With US Airways for E-170 and E-190 Frisky Pilot Regional 0 03-14-2005 06:53 PM
Fuel costs bedevil airlines SWAjet Major 0 02-26-2005 12:49 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7