Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2009, 11:51 AM   #61 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Farva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO CRJ-200
Posts: 87
Default

I would say let the cookie crumble before we start the "F" bomb game.
My opinion is though, given the current economy and the fact that no new aircraft have been announced to any DCI carrier since ASA getting the 900's, I would suspect that what we have now is gonna be the same in a few months. DAL and most other airlines are facing huge shortfalls because even if they get costs under control there will be less people flying because they are out of a job and out of money. Disposable income and excess spending will be shrinking in the next few months if not the rest of the year because of economic downturn. The overstaffing on the 200 FO side is very apparent. 90 FO's for 16 flying frames is way overstaffed since we are not gaining any new destination and in fact losing some to either the 900 or 9E. Also the 200 is such a small fleet that they do not need a huge reserve bank to begin with.

As for the Saab I can not really speak other than maybe some flying is getting cut back or somebody in crew planning thinks that they are overstaffed. As for the 900 it seems to me they are understaffed since they only have 7 straight reserve lines to cover MSP and SLC. Thats a pretty big gamble considering the 200 has 25 lines of straight reserve to cover MSP and DTW. Anyway I think unless a good amount of people take early out and TOWOP ,I think a furlough notice will be coming to keep costs in line. I dont like the idea of people getting kicked to the street but XJ mgt has a bussiness to run and if labor costs are sky high and they are finding that we are overstaffed, then there is not much we can do. Anyway just my opinion and people can bash away as much as they want.

-Farv
Farva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 01:26 PM   #62 (permalink)
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farva View Post
The overstaffing on the 200 FO side is very apparent. 90 FO's for 16 flying frames is way overstaffed since we are not gaining any new destination and in fact losing some to either the 900 or 9E.
I wouldn't say too overstaffed. 80 would be just right if you consider 5 FO's per plane. Unless the block hours aren't that high right now on them. Usually when the planes are being used efficiently you need about 10 pilots per plane. Unless it's a 777, then you need 30
tpersuit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 01:29 PM   #63 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
bored's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 492
Default

We have 17 200s, but anyhow I beg to differ that our labor costs are "sky high." We are or if not, very close to being the most junior pilot groups in the DCI portfolio. If they get some early outs, the average drops even more, dropping our average labor costs. The FAs work for pennies and have constant turn over and even within the MX ranks, the workforce is incredibly junior, since Ch11 drove away HUNDREDS of senior folks in all ranks at this airline.

I don't think we'll get very many early outs, but I would guess a fair amount of TOWOPs will be taken, as have in the past. I simply don't believe we're overstaffed by 100 people. Many of the people that were hired for the 15 900s unfortunately, never made it to class. The real problem lies with the backfilling they were doing to prepare for training movements. I suspect that's why the 200 is apparently overstaffed. For 17 planes we need roughly 170 pilots and really aren't that much over that.

Again... furloughs are always possible. But good news is possible as well and none of us know the big picture, except for mgmt. I think we do need to let the dust settle and see what happens and jumping to any conclusions without proper info, is simply a waste of time and energy.
bored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 05:08 PM   #64 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ftrooppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Body at sea level; heart at 70,000+
Posts: 752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bored View Post
We have 17 200s, but anyhow I beg to differ that our labor costs are "sky high." We are or if not, very close to being the most junior pilot groups in the DCI portfolio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Again... furloughs are always possible. But good news is possible as well and none of us know the big picture, except for mgmt. I think we do need to let the dust settle and see what happens and jumping to any conclusions without proper info, is simply a waste of time and energy.
Delta will favor regionals that are / have:

Stabilized (strike pending ?, furloughs, etc. )
High morale (read the threads)
Good training facilities and staff
Capability for rapid expansion
Ability to minimize training costs
Owned
Good working relationship between ops and management staff
Good working relationsip between union and airline management
Good safety record
Minimized costs

An example of costs is comparison of the Average FO pay during the first five years. Pinnacle ($31.10), Mesaba ($31.20), Comair ($33.80), ASA ($35.40), Compass ($34.20). Using 500 FOs at 70 hrs per month, there is a 1.5 million $$ difference per month between the high and low - that's just FOs. Imagine the total crew cost comparison.

The above is just an exercise and attempt to explain the rational that MAY be CONSIDERED BY Delta manager decision making when assigning future aircraft purchases or MOVING AIRCRAFT between regionals.
__________________
Do not fear the enemy. Fear the media; they will destroy your honor.
Ftrooppilot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2009, 09:34 PM   #65 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Colnago's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Being kicked to the street
Posts: 410
Default

I must admit I'm scared at the possibility of a furlough just being low on the bottom of the list. It's not so much that I'm scared of losing a flying job as it is of losing any type of employment with this crappy economy. Then again, I realize that worrying about this all the time won't make a damn difference in the end. Whatever will happen is going to happen whether I think pessimistic or optimistic. I'm enjoying things here at Mesaba and just hoping for the best.
Colnago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 03:50 AM   #66 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ 900 Captain
Posts: 726
Default

Overstaffed at Mesaba.... not this weekend, at least not on the 900's.
Avroman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:46 AM   #67 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
joethepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
Overstaffed at Mesaba.... not this weekend, at least not on the 900's.
No one ever said we were overstaffed on the 900. Thats why the 900 ppl aren't on the list of people that can take TOWOP... but for crying out loud look at the 200 FO side, and the Saab side... over staff madness.
joethepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 07:47 AM   #68 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
joethepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colnago View Post
I must admit I'm scared at the possibility of a furlough just being low on the bottom of the list. It's not so much that I'm scared of losing a flying job as it is of losing any type of employment with this crappy economy. Then again, I realize that worrying about this all the time won't make a damn difference in the end. Whatever will happen is going to happen whether I think pessimistic or optimistic. I'm enjoying things here at Mesaba and just hoping for the best.
How far up are you?
joethepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 01:58 PM   #69 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ 900 Captain
Posts: 726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joethepilot View Post
No one ever said we were overstaffed on the 900. Thats why the 900 ppl aren't on the list of people that can take TOWOP... but for crying out loud look at the 200 FO side, and the Saab side... over staff madness.
That's because the company decided to keep releasing Saab CA seatlocks and back fill those positions..... Had they stopped releasing them and just upgraded as before we wouldn't be so mis-staffed.
Avroman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2009, 04:42 PM   #70 (permalink)
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Furloughed from the CL-65 Jumpseat
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot View Post
Delta will favor regionals that are / have:

Stabilized (strike pending ?, furloughs, etc. )
High morale (read the threads)
Good training facilities and staff
Capability for rapid expansion
Ability to minimize training costs
Owned
Good working relationship between ops and management staff
Good working relationsip between union and airline management
Good safety record
Minimized costs

An example of costs is comparison of the Average FO pay during the first five years. Pinnacle ($31.10), Mesaba ($31.20), Comair ($33.80), ASA ($35.40), Compass ($34.20). Using 500 FOs at 70 hrs per month, there is a 1.5 million $$ difference per month between the high and low - that's just FOs. Imagine the total crew cost comparison.

The above is just an exercise and attempt to explain the rational that MAY be CONSIDERED BY Delta manager decision making when assigning future aircraft purchases or MOVING AIRCRAFT between regionals.

I think those are all things that may be considered..as you said

but the bottom line..is that it comes down to TWO and only two factors:

Cost
&
Quality

That's all that matters to Delta, or any airline for that matter.
__________________
If you don't like your job, i'll take it!
andy171773 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Early Retirements Anyone ??? tennesseeflyboy Cargo 22 01-17-2009 11:17 PM
It's official... 15 more 900s to Mesaba bored Regional 161 11-10-2008 09:38 PM
Early logbook entries snippercr Flight Training 6 10-24-2008 09:40 PM
New early pilot retirement program (just a joke) Opus Mergers and Acquisitions 3 09-19-2008 06:04 AM
Question for Guard Guys... Early Retirement Eligibility MJB68 Military 1 08-02-2008 02:48 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7