Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-2009, 06:05 PM   #21 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeyMeatballs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightIP View Post
Where would an XJT thread be without ToiletDuck?
seriously.........................
__________________
In Memory of our Fallen Brother SAABaroowski
JoeyMeatballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:19 PM   #22 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Oh the hypocrisy. United (or any other major carrier) will not be looking for another long term 50 seat contract carrier. It would most certainly be 70+. Now you see expressjet guys hoping their company is able to underbid everyone else. Where is the pride guys? You're now hoping to become the "cheap" labor? Gotta love it.

Btw, where has anyone heard United is unhappy with skywest or rah? A BK may or may not affect those companies, I don't know. Personally, I think a BK would result in additional regional flying up for grabs as opposed to the redistribution of the current contracts.
flyguy23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:30 PM   #23 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
Oh the hypocrisy. United (or any other major carrier) will not be looking for another long term 50 seat contract carrier. It would most certainly be 70+. Now you see expressjet guys hoping their company is able to underbid everyone else. Where is the pride guys? You're now hoping to become the "cheap" labor? Gotta love it.

Btw, where has anyone heard United is unhappy with skywest or rah? A BK may or may not affect those companies, I don't know. Personally, I think a BK would result in additional regional flying up for grabs as opposed to the redistribution of the current contracts.

XJT pilots aren't trying to undercut anyone......
XSive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:33 PM   #24 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
Default

Do you guys seriously think whats left of UALs scope allows for unlimited 70+ seaters? Why does everyone assume 50 seat markets are going away? There may be less of them but they are still there. I just don't get why United would bring XJT on this summer for "overcapacity" when they have been cutting routes left and right. There has to be something else going on. Then again, what do I know.
JetBlast77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:49 PM   #25 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
dojetdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DisplaceJet
Posts: 2,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
Oh the hypocrisy. United (or any other major carrier) will not be looking for another long term 50 seat contract carrier.
More than likely true

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
It would most certainly be 70+.
Very possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
Now you see expressjet guys hoping their company is able to underbid everyone else.
This is NOT true. First, not EVERYBODY at XJT wants it. Second, if the company does "under bid", is that lower bid based on cheap labor? Do we really need to go round after endless round about the concession at XJT and the rates that are STILL higher than most others and the work rules DIDN'T suffer?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
Where is the pride guys? You're now hoping to become the "cheap" labor? Gotta love it.
See above. You are obviously ignorant of what happened when XJT took a concession. It happened because CAL squeezed them into to a a corner, and to hold onto LESS flying than what they previously had. It wasn't an attempt to be cheaper and undercut another pilot group. Please, try to prove me wrong on this point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
Btw, where has anyone heard United is unhappy with skywest or rah?
If you have been paying attention to the other times this has happened, how "happy" the legacy was with the regional vendors had NOTHING to do with it. What made the legacy "happy" was getting the cost down. Being in BK or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
A BK may or may not affect those companies, I don't know. Personally, I think a BK would result in additional regional flying up for grabs as opposed to the redistribution of the current contracts.
Well, thats what we're talking about here, isn't it?
dojetdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:53 PM   #26 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slaphappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 462
Default

XJT is a dying airline just like Comair.
Slaphappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:56 PM   #27 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
Default

Did everybody forget about Gojets? they are getting planes as fast as bombardier can produce them at this point. Who is to say United won't dump RAH and SKW to put more Gojets planes in. I'm sorry but RAH will be tasting it's own medicine really really soon.

As far as expressjet, hope you guys get out of this soon, get some new flying, and start calling back. It's sad to see one of the last few remaining regionals with a decent contract struggling like this.
xtreme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 06:58 PM   #28 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
dojetdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DisplaceJet
Posts: 2,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slaphappy View Post
XJT is a dying airline just like Comair.
XJT took a pretty good kick to the deli package lately.

But please, with all your knowledge of this industry, please expand on your points? While you're at it, any chance you could tell us where you got your crystal ball, because I'd like to get that model myself.

And since that thing is so good, what's it say is going to happen in the next 6 1/2 years for XJT?
dojetdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 07:22 PM   #29 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Default

Every check airman and or union rep I have talked to said they do not expect more furloughs this fall. We will have more COLAs and plenty of RFLs in Sep and Oct but we may need every one for next spring/summer and a 6 month furlough doesn't help anyone. Remember last October and how we barely had any lines? The company also turned down the union's early out offer saying it doesn't make financial sense right now, we see that as a sign that no staffing changes are needed. Knock on wood.......
cybourg10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 08:55 PM   #30 (permalink)
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: emb-145 ca
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slaphappy View Post
XJT is a dying airline just like Comair.
But we are dying much more slowly (a 7 year slow-death profitless CPA with 6 years to go!) whoo hooo! Just hope we can get a few more profitless CPAs. Nothing like being essentially a public utility for the majors.
CaptainNameless is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FDX - MEC April 8th Update and 777 Bid machz990 Cargo 19 04-10-2009 10:52 AM
Gambling on XJT and their future JetJock16 Regional 275 12-03-2008 09:59 AM
Logbook Pro vNext update? skytrekker Hangar Talk 0 11-13-2008 07:18 AM
ExpressJet coming back? USMCFLYR Regional 8 10-21-2008 10:21 PM
ExpressJet Reports Results of Vote at Special Meeting OscarOscar Regional 2 10-01-2008 11:57 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7