Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-2009, 09:02 PM   #31 (permalink)
Banned
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNameless View Post
But we are dying much more slowly (a 7 year slow-death profitless CPA with 6 years to go!) whoo hooo! Just hope we can get a few more profitless CPAs. Nothing like being essentially a public utility for the majors.
Looks like someone gets it. Something at the company has to change. Currently still operating at a loss after closure of branded so something has to give. Lets hope it's not furloughs or a round two paycut.
ToiletDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2009, 10:15 PM   #32 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
Looks like someone gets it. Something at the company has to change. Currently still operating at a loss after closure of branded so something has to give. Lets hope it's not furloughs or a round two paycut.

or that they don't get 190s and pay their pilots $37 an hour to fly them
JetBlast77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 04:49 AM   #33 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirWillie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetBlast77 View Post
I just don't get why United would bring XJT on this summer for "overcapacity" when they have been cutting routes left and right. There has to be something else going on. Then again, what do I know.
The regulars can't do it that's why. TSA has contract problems, Skywest is busy elsewhere, Mesa is in deep S they don't even have people to staff their operation. I don't know anything about the shaniqua UAX flying but I do know they're getting axed later in the year. Xjet will have to do a whole lot of underbidding to get around the regulars, UA knows they can do the operation. If UA goes BK it will be like 911 again with a bunch more regional flying and less mainline flying.
AirWillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 06:21 AM   #34 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeyMeatballs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetBlast77 View Post
or that they don't get 190s and pay their pilots $37 an hour to fly them
no kidding, maybe TD should be more concerned about that rather than the future of XJT
__________________
In Memory of our Fallen Brother SAABaroowski
JoeyMeatballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 06:23 AM   #35 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeyMeatballs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cybourg10 View Post
Every check airman and or union rep I have talked to said they do not expect more furloughs this fall. We will have more COLAs and plenty of RFLs in Sep and Oct but we may need every one for next spring/summer and a 6 month furlough doesn't help anyone. Remember last October and how we barely had any lines? The company also turned down the union's early out offer saying it doesn't make financial sense right now, we see that as a sign that no staffing changes are needed. Knock on wood.......
FWIW, I am the EWR Union Rep (F/O) and I am not so sure they are correct, call me if you want to discuss, phone numbers on our ALPA website


Also for all the brainiacs that rant and rave how the 50 seater is dead, looking back the past 5-10 years the strongest airlines inlcude CAL, AMR, and SWA how many 70 seat jest do you guys see flying for them? AMR has the tightest scope (other than CAL) for 51+ seat jets, look at DAL, USairways etc all the 70 seat jet feed in the world didnt help their balance sheet. You people thing 70 seat regional feed is the saving grace for majors, it really isnt
__________________
In Memory of our Fallen Brother SAABaroowski
JoeyMeatballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 05:56 PM   #36 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
FWIW, I am the EWR Union Rep (F/O) and I am not so sure they are correct, call me if you want to discuss, phone numbers on our ALPA website


Also for all the brainiacs that rant and rave how the 50 seater is dead, looking back the past 5-10 years the strongest airlines inlcude CAL, AMR, and SWA how many 70 seat jest do you guys see flying for them?
How many 50 seaters does Southwest have?
GoBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 06:47 PM   #37 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
aussieflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: EMB-145 F/O
Posts: 137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloodhound View Post
Actually, I did mean XJT. In other words, CAL may be dropping 11,000 hours from their system, including CAL, XJT, Colgan, CHQ, etc. As opposed to dropping XJT's block hours by 11,000.
Sorry champ, my bad... I misunderstood you
__________________
"If it weren't for sexual fantasies, I'd have no goals at all"
aussieflyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 07:13 PM   #38 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
LivinTheDream28's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBlue View Post
How many 50 seaters does Southwest have?
How many 70 seaters do they have? Thats the point he's trying to make dude.
LivinTheDream28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 07:29 PM   #39 (permalink)
Banned
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetBlast77 View Post
or that they don't get 190s and pay their pilots $37 an hour to fly them
Is that a question? If it is I don't understand what you're asking. If it's not then it doesn't relate to anything I said.
ToiletDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 07:34 PM   #40 (permalink)
Banned
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
no kidding, maybe TD should be more concerned about that rather than the future of XJT
I'm plenty concerned about it. Start a thread on it and we can discuss it. I figured that an XJT thread would discuss XJT. I know the reality of the situations and when the time comes where I'm capable of making a difference, rather than being some internet armchair quarterback, I will. It's a little ironic that a person who runs around dissing another pilot group and their company left and right feels insulted when someone says XJT isn't in good financial health and needs a different strategy. I guess I could sink to the same level and start calling people "scabs" and "Cancers of the industry" as you have but I actually like talking about the topics made with a certain amount of sincerity since what affects one affects us all. This is a thread about XJT on a public forum. We're all free to talk about it and there's no reason we can't so long as we keep it professional. Stop crying all the time.
ToiletDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FDX - MEC April 8th Update and 777 Bid machz990 Cargo 19 04-10-2009 10:52 AM
Gambling on XJT and their future JetJock16 Regional 275 12-03-2008 09:59 AM
Logbook Pro vNext update? skytrekker Hangar Talk 0 11-13-2008 07:18 AM
ExpressJet coming back? USMCFLYR Regional 8 10-21-2008 10:21 PM
ExpressJet Reports Results of Vote at Special Meeting OscarOscar Regional 2 10-01-2008 11:57 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7