Quote:
Originally Posted by JDFlyer
I am not complaining. I gladly took the job at SkyWest knowing full well why my first year pay would be what it was. In an industry where the economic reality is razor thin profit margins, I only ask that everybody carry their own weight. The sum total of the organization can only be profitable if the individual parts each contribute in a positive way.
In my opinion, it is a little out of balance to ask me or any other pilot, flight attendant, ramper, gate agent, etc. or any other SkyWest employee to "finance" (lower salary, lower quarterly bonus, lower stock price, etc.) the flight training for someone else. Anyway, this is all a moot point. As it was explained above, they do get paid 1st year pay from SkyWest and it is up to UAL ALPA to pay the rest.
I would assume that mainline pilots would not take the job at SkyWest if they did not want it or could not afford it.
In reality, I don't think most mainline pilots would take the job anyway. All the guys I know who left SkyWest to go to United and got promptly furloughed are all now employed in non-aviation related fields making much more money than they did flying airplanes for SkyWest and/or United and they are home every night. They are not coming back to SkyWest and will very likely not go back to United.
|
I'm sorry, but it does sound like you are complaining rather than being happy for someone that doesn't have to live through first year pay at SKW. Also, keep in mind that despite what you say about the industry, SKW still has almost three quarters of a billion dollars sitting in the bank and using it to buy foreign airlines. Seems like the employees have been more than carrying their own wait for a long time to build up that kitty only for it to be used for something else.
In my opinion, it is a little out of balance to ask you or any other pilot, flight attendant, ramper, gate agent, etc. or any other SkyWest employee to "finance" the company for someone else. Good for the union to help their fellow UAL pilots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickair7777
No point in even discussing stapling or DOH...federal law now requires alleghany-mohawk procedures...regardless of union status.
|
Actually, theoretically there can be stapling or DOH despite the new law. As long as the DOH or stapling was considered fair and equitable either through negotiations or arbitration.