Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2009, 06:39 PM   #61 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirWillie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowlevel View Post
I never said a word about maintenance, I said the aircraft suck. The EMB-145, without the mod that airlines such as ExpressJet did (and Freedom did not because they didn't want to spend money) is a bad aircraft to operate where you need to carry a full load of pax and bags, and the wx might go down. It can't do it. I have been DH'ing on Freedom planes at JFK when they could only take 40 pax, on a 50 seat a/c that is unacceptable.
Having learned to fly in the northeast, flown part 135 single pilot cargo in the northeast, and being based at JFK for the past two years, I would not call it "Extreme weather", it's just normal northeast weather. As far as being on time at JFK, if wx delays or ATC delays pop up, you can't help it. If you can't crew your planes because you do not have enough reserves, that is your company's fault.
The 145 LR solves most of the weight problems. Full boat on a two hour flight including the JS is no problem. 0-37k with no step climbing as well.
AirWillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 10:19 AM   #62 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lowlevel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Toilet Seat
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AirWillie View Post
The 145 LR solves most of the weight problems. Full boat on a two hour flight including the JS is no problem. 0-37k with no step climbing as well.
Freedom operates the EMB145 LR, so why do they still have w&b problems?
Lowlevel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 12:03 PM   #63 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
hslightnin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowlevel View Post
Freedom operates the EMB145 LR, so why do they still have w&b problems?
we dont until winter(winter weights) and the weather is crap. 99% of the time its a max landing weight restriction. & Unlike the CRJ the only ballast we need is for ferry flights to get to a min weight.
hslightnin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 12:38 PM   #64 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AirWillie View Post
The 145 LR solves most of the weight problems. Full boat on a two hour flight including the JS is no problem. 0-37k with no step climbing as well.
The LR still has weight problems, the LR2 fixes the problem.
GoBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 12:39 PM   #65 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowlevel View Post
Freedom operates the EMB145 LR, so why do they still have w&b problems?
I actually talked with both a Mesa ERJ and ExpressJet ERJ CA about this in 2004, and this is what they told me. If my recollection or #'s are wrong, chalk it up to my memory.

1) Freedom uses higher average weights for their passengers. Carriers like ExpressJet actually weighed their passengers and baggage @ one point after the FAA mandated higher weights following the AirMidwest 5481 crash. By taking actual weights, they were able to petition the FAA to use weights based on their 'actual weight' study, and these weights are lower.

2) Freedom counts carry-on bags that go in the bin twice for weight. Passengers weigh 170 (in the summer), which includes their carry-on bag. As we all know, about 1/2 of all carry-on bags don't fit in ERJ bins (or most any other regional bin). Thus, the bags are gate-checked. Any bag put in the cargo bin weighs 30 lbs. Thus a bag that has already been accounted for in the W&B is counted again.

3) ExpressJet has paid for a mod to up their weights, including max landing weight. Freedom hasn't. Thus the planes, though identical from a mechanical standpoint, don't have the same certified max weights.

Again, not sure if these issues are unique to Freedom ERJ's (or even accurate), but they are my recollection as to why Mesa/Freedom ERJ's seem to bump jumpseaters, bags, and passengers more often than some other ERJ operators. The issues are most prevalent on short legs or with an alternate, as I recall, and are certified max landing weight limited.

Feel free to correct me if I'm in the wrong.
Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 01:25 PM   #66 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
dojetdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DisplaceJet
Posts: 3,030
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
I actually talked with both a Mesa ERJ and ExpressJet ERJ CA about this in 2004, and this is what they told me. If my recollection or #'s are wrong, chalk it up to my memory.

1) Freedom uses higher average weights for their passengers. Carriers like ExpressJet actually weighed their passengers and baggage @ one point after the FAA mandated higher weights following the AirMidwest 5481 crash. By taking actual weights, they were able to petition the FAA to use weights based on their 'actual weight' study, and these weights are lower.

2) Freedom counts carry-on bags that go in the bin twice for weight. Passengers weigh 170 (in the summer), which includes their carry-on bag. As we all know, about 1/2 of all carry-on bags don't fit in ERJ bins (or most any other regional bin). Thus, the bags are gate-checked. Any bag put in the cargo bin weighs 30 lbs. Thus a bag that has already been accounted for in the W&B is counted again.

3) ExpressJet has paid for a mod to up their weights, including max landing weight. Freedom hasn't. Thus the planes, though identical from a mechanical standpoint, don't have the same certified max weights.

Again, not sure if these issues are unique to Freedom ERJ's (or even accurate), but they are my recollection as to why Mesa/Freedom ERJ's seem to bump jumpseaters, bags, and passengers more often than some other ERJ operators. The issues are most prevalent on short legs or with an alternate, as I recall, and are certified max landing weight limited.

Feel free to correct me if I'm in the wrong.
And your memory would be correct, as far as the XJT side goes. However, XJT has done more weight mods since 2004. It was pretty common in 2005-2006 to be limited. Usually about 44-45 people with bags was it. Not much of a problem any more. I've only seen a few where we were restricted to maybe 49 depending on bag count. Many of the short segments we operate on out of our hubs are business travelers with a "gate checked bag" (lower weight for WB purposes) only and not a "standard checked bag", lowering the total cargo weight.
dojetdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 07:02 PM   #67 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 137
Default

XJT is serious about their weights, I heard they have special weights for everything. Like a female pilot is put down as less lbs than a male one? Confirm/deny?
SpiraMirabilis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 07:14 PM   #68 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
dojetdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DisplaceJet
Posts: 3,030
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpiraMirabilis View Post
XJT is serious about their weights, I heard they have special weights for everything. Like a female pilot is put down as less lbs than a male one? Confirm/deny?
Confirm, the cockpit section of the W/B on the ACARS has selectable M or F, with a corresponding weight difference for ZFW and CG spin.
dojetdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 07:55 PM   #69 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
winglet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
These #'s are not all that relevant since Mesa Airlines doesn't operate any Delta Connection flights. Freedom Airlines operates all Delta Connection flights.

Mesa Airlines = YV = United Express and US Airways Express
Freedom Airlines = F8 = Delta Connection
Mesa Air Group = Mesa Airlines and Freedom Airlines

Sniper,

You are correct about F8 being DCI and not YV but I don't think you can dismiss the numbers as irrelevant. The numbers reflect that all of the parties involved have similar difficulties in JFK and elsewhere. I was attempting to show how similar the DCI operators were, not how different.

My post was in response to one of the tired "my-airline-is-so-much-better-than-your-airline" posts on this forum. It was my attempt to introduce pot to kettle. Here are probably the best sources of airline comparison for those on this forum who would like to know the facts:

http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/reports/atcr09.htm

http://www.transtats.bts.gov/OT_Dela...elayCause1.asp

If you know of better sources of comparison of DCI operators in JFK during this time period I'd llike to see the numbers.

Thanks,
Winglet

Last edited by winglet : 07-12-2009 at 08:06 PM.
winglet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comair updates? On Autopilot Regional 16898 03-18-2010 05:19 PM
MESA sells China Venture AirbornPegasus Regional 14 04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Bastian thinks low oil worth $5B to DAL dragon Major 60 12-06-2008 04:43 PM
Crazy pilot in ROA? ksatflyer Hangar Talk 10 08-20-2008 09:14 PM
Mesa and Delta not sitting in a tree Releasemaster Regional 13 08-14-2008 09:36 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7