Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2009, 11:10 AM   #91 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
NightHawk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastoff View Post
likewise, just because 13 ac are announced for ASA, don't assume UAL is done awarding flying, otherwise all the Mesa folks would be on here celebrating UAL not cancelling them.
Just want to clarify, there is nothing to cancel and nothing to renew. The contract is up. End of story. The flying will go to regionals who are willing fork out money, followed by the cheapest bidders.
NightHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 12:23 PM   #92 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: On Mil Leave
Posts: 710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightHawk View Post
Just want to clarify, there is nothing to cancel and nothing to renew. The contract is up. End of story. The flying will go to regionals who are willing fork out money, followed by the cheapest bidders.
The piont is, there is flying for dozens of aircraft yet to be awarded. Stay tuned.
blastoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 01:36 PM   #93 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: CR7
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambourne View Post
The "loan" from SKYW will never have to be repaid by UAL. Seeing as how the amount is not that great. I am guessing this was UAL's estimate of the amount of monetary penalties that ASA would pile up for lack of performance in the new UAX operation.

L
Is this statement directed towards ASA and how they perform in the DCI? Not really sure where you are going with this one.
afterburn81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 04:47 PM   #94 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Gunga Galunga's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: unpaid vacation
Posts: 69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambourne View Post
The "loan" from SKYW will never have to be repaid by UAL. Seeing as how the amount is not that great. I am guessing this was UAL's estimate of the amount of monetary penalties that ASA would pile up for lack of performance in the new UAX operation.

L
kindly do us all a favor and keep your ignorant, baseless remarks to your UAL threads. I doubt anyone at ASA who has worked hard over the past few years trying to turn around the operation appreciates your .02
Gunga Galunga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 05:16 PM   #95 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunga Galunga View Post
kindly do us all a favor and keep your ignorant, baseless remarks to your UAL threads. I doubt anyone at ASA who has worked hard over the past few years trying to turn around the operation appreciates your .02
I think that was his goal. If you look at other posts he makes on APC it's the same. Always trying to stir up the pot.
USMC3197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 05:27 PM   #96 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Skywest is getting 11% ROI on their $80M investment
It's not really an 11% ROI. You need to account for opportunity cost and inflation. Even if the opportunity cost is zero it's more line 8%-9% ROI. Also not mentioned is the risk of the deal. Don't get me wrong, I think it was a good deal for SKYW but it's not an 11% ROI.
ERJFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2009, 08:17 PM   #97 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERJFO View Post
It's not really an 11% ROI. You need to account for opportunity cost and inflation. Even if the opportunity cost is zero it's more line 8%-9% ROI. Also not mentioned is the risk of the deal. Don't get me wrong, I think it was a good deal for SKYW but it's not an 11% ROI.
I understand where you’re coming from but it's still an 11% ROI on the first $80M and 8% on the last $49M. Do you think the money earns that kind of ROI when it’s just sitting in the bank? More than likely it’s not even gaining a rate even close to inflation. Plus when was the last time you purchased a car or took out a loan (not a mortgage) and the bank wanted to adjust your rate every year based upon inflation, risk, value of the dollar and /or taxes? Ok, sounds like a Credit Card loan….LOL! Now if you want to talk about the total ending value of the agreement, that’s a different story because you have to factor in all of the below.

Speaking of Opportunity Cost………………40 jets secured for an average of 8.4 years, 14 a/c placed into service, an 11% ROI on $80M, 8% on $49M and last rights all secured by equipment and airport slots verses a small bank interest rate? Sounds way to damn good to be true.
__________________
GOVERNMENT: If you think the problems we create are bad, you should see our solutions.
JetJock16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Those that commute on UAL, MUST READ BHopper88 Regional 42 07-29-2009 10:28 AM
So, you want to be an airline pilot? captain_drew Flight Training 30 02-11-2009 10:52 AM
A Dream to Fly Mason32 Hangar Talk 8 02-07-2009 08:30 AM
Will Fly for Free SAABaroowski Regional 51 12-12-2008 12:47 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7