Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Regional Regional airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2009, 10:06 AM   #21 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 56
Default

Can you post a source?

Last edited by ERJFO : 10-21-2009 at 12:41 AM. Reason: JetJock asked me to delete his quote
ERJFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:08 AM   #22 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 406
Default

Now I am just a bit worried on how Delta feels about this... After all they are still ASA's main contract and 2010 is our 5yr review.
USMC3197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:10 AM   #23 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 406
Default

.............

Last edited by USMC3197 : 10-20-2009 at 06:49 PM.
USMC3197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:12 AM   #24 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC3197 View Post
Now I am just a bit worried on how Delta feels about this... After all they are still ASA's main contract and 2010 is our 5yr review.
I dont work for ASA obvioulsy but i was just talking to my wife yesterday about how down our country has become about everything and how depressed we are. You guys just got new flying that hopefully will prevent furloughs and maybe lead to something more for you guys. Thats good news isnt it?
Delta likes to think the world revolves around them but it doesnt so maybe being more diverse is a good thing. I wish Pinnacle's eggs werent all in one basket.
Congrats to ASA guys.
PinnacleFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:15 AM   #25 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyASA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CRJ-200 First Officer
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC3197 View Post
Now I am just a bit worried on how Delta feels about this... After all they are still ASA's main contract and 2010 is our 5yr review.
Why would they care? Skywest, Mesa, Pinnacle (through Colgan), and RAH all fly for different carriers while flying for Delta too. RAH has loaned money to Frontier, Midwest, and US Airways.

I think Delta should be more concerned with funding a potential direct competitor with their contracts with RAH.
FlyASA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:18 AM   #26 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERJFO View Post
Can you post a source?
The wording was sent out to our company so until I can find it on the internet I cannot post our COO (Chip’s) correspondence. Sorry, been there done that.

Once again, that's HUGE!
__________________
GOVERNMENT: If you think the problems we create are bad, you should see our solutions.

Last edited by JetJock16 : 10-20-2009 at 11:34 AM.
JetJock16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:19 AM   #27 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyASA View Post
Why would they care? Skywest, Mesa, Pinnacle (through Colgan), and RAH all fly for different carriers while flying for Delta too. RAH has loaned money to Frontier, Midwest, and US Airways.

I think Delta should be more concerned with funding a potential direct competitor with their contracts with RAH.
I agree, Delta doesn't give a crap.

It also dispels that rumor that Delta wants to buy ASA back.
__________________
GOVERNMENT: If you think the problems we create are bad, you should see our solutions.
JetJock16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:21 AM   #28 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: On Mil Leave
Posts: 710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace View Post
Would it be beneficial for United to split this RFP up 3 or 4 ways? I would think that having 3 or 4 different regionals to deal with would make things way more complicated than they need to be.
They could do that, they could give it back to Mesa too. We'll just have to wait and see.
blastoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:36 AM   #29 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJock16 View Post
The wording was sent out to our company so until I can find it on the internet I cannot post our COO (Chip’s) correspondence. Sorry, been there done that.

But it is true; SKW Airlines now has last rights to any Large UAL TP award.

Once again, that's HUGE!
They may say SKW Airlines, but that part is irrelevant. It will go to whomever they decide. There's nothing to prevent them from buying the certificate of somebody who operates Q400s already and having them do the flying.

Just like how when SkyWest, Inc. bought ASA and made a big deal about how ASA had the rights to 80% of DCI flying in ATL. Then later we found out after SKW moved in full force that it really applied to Inc., and they could do what they want.
sweptback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 10:52 AM   #30 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweptback View Post
They may say SKW Airlines, but that part is irrelevant. It will go to whomever they decide. There's nothing to prevent them from buying the certificate of somebody who operates Q400s already and having them do the flying.

Just like how when SkyWest, Inc. bought ASA and made a big deal about how ASA had the rights to 80% of DCI flying in ATL. Then later we found out after SKW moved in full force that it really applied to Inc., and they could do what they want.
Yes, there's nothing to stop them (no union), but history has shown our Mgmnt group to be all about SKW Airlines. In every single transaction that SKW Inc has agreed to or negotiated they've always given a kick back to SKW Airlines.

1. ASA purchase secured SKW footing on SLC and future growth.
2. ExpressJet purchase was going to include future ERJ flying for SKW under the CAL banner.
3. ASA's UAL agreement secures 40 of our jets futures and offers us last rights on any TP award.

If we had any other Mgmnt team I would say yes that could happen and although it could it won’t.

Also your comment about SKW in ATL is only partially true. We didn’t come in with full force, we waded in and still to this day haven’t commented our full resources to the amount of flying we have out there. Regardless it was comical (toward Inc.) to see SKW pull the SLC card on ASA just to put us in ATL. Just goes to show you that ASA will survive but only benefit when SKW benefits.

This is just my opinion and I’m pro-pilot (ASA and SKW).

PS. Have you checked to see if ASA only covers the 80% mark in ATL with SKW included? I'm sure we don't factor into your ATL DCI %age mark.
__________________
GOVERNMENT: If you think the problems we create are bad, you should see our solutions.
JetJock16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Those that commute on UAL, MUST READ BHopper88 Regional 42 07-29-2009 10:28 AM
So, you want to be an airline pilot? captain_drew Flight Training 30 02-11-2009 10:52 AM
A Dream to Fly Mason32 Hangar Talk 8 02-07-2009 08:30 AM
Will Fly for Free SAABaroowski Regional 51 12-12-2008 12:47 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7