Next Stage of Desperation in the Regionals
#11
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: 747-400/-8 CA
Posts: 47
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 370
H2 Visas are still another option, but the airlines are not going to spend $5K for just one person. that will not work. its only valid for 2 years Max if I recall.
plus they need to get the Pilots certificate to be converted to FAA... time and money the airlines are not going to spend.
Yes, this was a great Joke! LMAO
plus they need to get the Pilots certificate to be converted to FAA... time and money the airlines are not going to spend.
Yes, this was a great Joke! LMAO
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 445
Surely they couldnt just bring in foreign labor because their low wages and poor conditions mean they cannot attract American labor?
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Hey guys,
Just noticed on our union's job webpage tonight that for the first time I've ever seen, Australians are being offered opportunities in the USA, with basically all expenses paid! (See below)
And also, has there been any progress regarding your contracts? I know several regionals were voting down pathetic deals a few months ago but have been out of touch with the US flying industry since then. And there is simply too much to go searching through to find a short answer.
Just noticed on our union's job webpage tonight that for the first time I've ever seen, Australians are being offered opportunities in the USA, with basically all expenses paid! (See below)
And also, has there been any progress regarding your contracts? I know several regionals were voting down pathetic deals a few months ago but have been out of touch with the US flying industry since then. And there is simply too much to go searching through to find a short answer.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 289
A couple of you had said this is a joke and I agree; but is it actually in effect and working yet?
That's ridiculous that they are willing to pay all those costs and not raise pay...but companies will go to any extreme to not hire citizens and pay a liveable wage. Just research the battle of the programmer's guild and companies like Microsoft.
Hope this doesn't work but you never know, 'til you know
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's ridiculous that they are willing to pay all those costs and not raise pay...but companies will go to any extreme to not hire citizens and pay a liveable wage. Just research the battle of the programmer's guild and companies like Microsoft.
Hope this doesn't work but you never know, 'til you know
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 294
They will ABSOLUTELY spend tons of money on initial new hires, all day long before they EVER raise pay rates for the rest. They can spin these expenses to their stockholders, ect. as controllable short term, temporary cost. But pay raises are long term cost. You're already seeing them offer $5K sign on bonuses, and $10K scholarships to new hires, but not offering a single penny to those already on property beyond 1st year pay. They not only have a "hiring" problem, but more importantly, a "retention" problem. If they could offer a new person an additional $15K (in bonuses), on top of their $25K 1st yr salary, to get them in the door and avoid across the board raises, they'd do whatever they have to. Management's problem is: any raise, be it just for first year pay, or all FO's, or the whole pilot group has to be approved in an LOA by the pilot's collective bargaining association. Their union is not likely to allow a pay raise for a small sect of the group, while the whole group is grossly underpaid. Otherwise, that allows the company to fix a small part of their own mess, at the rest of the pilot groups expense. So, since new hires are not part of the union, nor under that airline's CBA, they can be offered anything possible by the company, without the rest of the pilot group being entitled to it. The LAST thing any airline managers want to do, is to implement pay raises. Those are permanent costs, that they will not be able to take back for a decade, if ever.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 289
They will ABSOLUTELY spend tons of money on initial new hires, all day long before they EVER raise pay rates for the rest. They can spin these expenses to their stockholders, ect. as controllable short term, temporary cost. But pay raises are long term cost. You're already seeing them offer $5K sign on bonuses, and $10K scholarships to new hires, but not offering a single penny to those already on property beyond 1st year pay. They not only have a "hiring" problem, but more importantly, a "retention" problem. If they could offer a new person an additional $15K (in bonuses), on top of their $25K 1st yr salary, to get them in the door and avoid across the board raises, they'd do whatever they have to. Management's problem is: any raise, be it just for first year pay, or all FO's, or the whole pilot group has to be approved in an LOA by the pilot's collective bargaining association. Their union is not likely to allow a pay raise for a small sect of the group, while the whole group is grossly underpaid. Otherwise, that allows the company to fix a small part of their own mess, at the rest of the pilot groups expense. So, since new hires are not part of the union, nor under that airline's CBA, they can be offered anything possible by the company, without the rest of the pilot group being entitled to it. The LAST thing any airline managers want to do, is to implement pay raises. Those are permanent costs, that they will not be able to take back for a decade, if ever.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#20
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: Property Manager
Posts: 69
They will ABSOLUTELY spend tons of money on initial new hires, all day long before they EVER raise pay rates for the rest. They can spin these expenses to their stockholders, ect. as controllable short term, temporary cost. But pay raises are long term cost. You're already seeing them offer $5K sign on bonuses, and $10K scholarships to new hires, but not offering a single penny to those already on property beyond 1st year pay. They not only have a "hiring" problem, but more importantly, a "retention" problem. If they could offer a new person an additional $15K (in bonuses), on top of their $25K 1st yr salary, to get them in the door and avoid across the board raises, they'd do whatever they have to. Management's problem is: any raise, be it just for first year pay, or all FO's, or the whole pilot group has to be approved in an LOA by the pilot's collective bargaining association. Their union is not likely to allow a pay raise for a small sect of the group, while the whole group is grossly underpaid. Otherwise, that allows the company to fix a small part of their own mess, at the rest of the pilot groups expense. So, since new hires are not part of the union, nor under that airline's CBA, they can be offered anything possible by the company, without the rest of the pilot group being entitled to it. The LAST thing any airline managers want to do, is to implement pay raises. Those are permanent costs, that they will not be able to take back for a decade, if ever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr Spooner
Flight Schools and Training
138
05-03-2008 03:18 PM