Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
upgrade vs. wholly owned? >

upgrade vs. wholly owned?

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

upgrade vs. wholly owned?

Old 08-21-2014, 07:38 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot View Post
Not true. No one FLOWED against their will.

It doesn't work that way.
Not exactly true IMO. I would argue that guys who took the flow under a certain set of circumstances, but were not afforded the opportunity to flow up under those circumstances should not have been forced to flow later under much different circumstances.

I know opinions differ on this specific situation, but the point I was making was that flow-through programs have done more harm than good as far as I can see. Not a great track record.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 07:48 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: PNF
Posts: 622
Default

Just don't PSA your situation and you will be fine. Do whatever your mind is telling you.

Also, as for upgrade at your time, upgrade will be more like 3-4 years depending on the regional. Most minimums are 3000-4000 hours. At 600 hours per year average with EVERYONE else in the company trying to do the same, it might take longer than you think. Also, they won't lower the minimums because there are plenty of 5k hour FOs out there willing to jump ship if DECs happen.
yimke is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 07:52 AM
  #13  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

As many have stated, wholly-owneds aren't doing much better than anyone else. Read through a little of the Warning about Endeavor to Delta (ETD) thread and you'll get a good idea. Everyone agrees a quick upgrade is a positive thing, the hesitance to chase one comes from the possibility that when you get to a regional, upgrade time might get a lot longer before you upgrade. Research trends, who's getting new airplanes and who isn't, and who has 50-seat jets. 50-seat jets are no longer economical and have become liabilities, not assets. That's why I'd recommend against a carrier like Air Wisconsin, even though they might have a respectable contract.

A while ago, I made a post about my recommendations. It's just my humble opinion - I'm still in training and don't have any actual time on the line, and some called me on that - but I did a lot of homework and spoke to numerous friends in the industry, and this is what I came up with:


Originally Posted by deltajuliet View Post
Invariably, the ultimate question this thread will probably evolve into is: "Who should I work for?" We argue about that day and night on these boards, but allow me to humbly offer my suggestions. Keep in mind this is as of right now; things could be different in a year.

Mesa - Fast upgrade time, stable, growing, modern fleet.

Compass - Pretty much the same as Mesa.

SkyWest - This is sort of the opposite in that it's not growing and you'll have a very long upgrade (~7 years as of now). However, many of my friends have elected to go here for its well respected treatment of employees.

Horizon - Excellent pay (at least compared to other regionals). Long upgrade, however.

One other deciding factor for you might be the bases these regionals have. I live in Phoenix, so naturally Mesa was an obvious choice for me. Again, this is my humble 2 cents, do your own homework, and best of luck.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:20 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jet87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: OO RJ FO
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by AlaskaBound View Post
Quote:





Originally Posted by RJ Pilot


Lets put it this way, I wouldn't put myself nor my family in any of those 1-2yr upgrade regionals.




You must not be a pilot. You obviously don't understand how the industry works. Your response has nothing to do with the OP question.

With that said, asking that question on this forum will get a thousand different responses. Everyone has different experiences. I worked for a wholly owned and it turned out bad. The mainline partner can do whatever they want...not having to abide by any contracts. They can give and TAKE airplanes as much and as often as they want.
Quick upgrades are happening at several airlines. SKW and ExpressJet have long upgrade times while Compass, Republic, Mesa, etc have quick upgrades. Research their contracts or what their pilots have to say if you can't get your hands on a contract. If you're willing to relocate...that might be your best move. I'm a little biased..Compass has super fast upgrade times, a decent contract, adding 20 more airplanes over the next year and a half, and flowing 160 more captains to Delta. No brainer. But like I said...I'm biased. I have really enjoyed my time at Compass so take that for what it's worth.
Republic had a quick upgrade? That's news to me
Jet87 is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:36 AM
  #15  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Neither is an asset. A quick upgrade is only good as long as there are people behind you to hire. A wholly-owned is only good if the ownership group actually wants to make it not suck.

The biggest thing you can do to make your life slightly less hellish at the regional level:

Live in base. Either move to a base, or get hired at a company that has a base where you are.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:40 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Musical Chairs
Posts: 74
Default

I personally went to 2 different regionals chasing the "quick upgrade"; one in particular at a smaller airline with bases I liked, and new planes coming on property. Sounds a lot like the advice a lot of you folks are giving, right? Now I'm at the very bottom of the FO list on reserve about to get "Comaired". Looking back I wish I chose a regional that had:
1. A base I live in or would like to live in
2. Moderate movement/stability
3. A Decent contract ($ and QOL)
Unfortunately times have changed since 8 years ago when I started this endeavor (pun intended) and the regionals that had the aforementioned qualities will be shrinking or also getting "Comaired". In the end it's simply luck and timing, my friends.
Banja is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:41 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Moonwolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Sleeping
Posts: 1,035
Default

Go to a regional that makes absolutely no sense right now, that way in a couple years it'll be the cream of the crop.
Moonwolf is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:48 AM
  #18  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by Moonwolf View Post
Go to a regional that makes absolutely no sense right now, that way in a couple years it'll be the cream of the crop.
This is unfortunately the most reliable piece of advice anyone has given regarding the regional airlines.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:50 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ChipChelios's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 599
Default

^^^that. I wish this forum had a like button
ChipChelios is offline  
Old 08-21-2014, 08:50 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by Moonwolf View Post
Go to a regional that makes absolutely no sense right now, that way in a couple years it'll be the cream of the crop.
So, Great Lakes or Air Wisconsin would seem to be the lead contenders?
NVUS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
schone
Regional
30
03-24-2010 07:06 AM
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
shimmydamp
Regional
1
09-05-2008 10:09 PM
Scoop
Major
106
05-05-2008 09:09 PM
flycrj200
Mergers and Acquisitions
11
04-18-2008 08:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices