Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy FOs to possibly get $20k retention! >

Envoy FOs to possibly get $20k retention!

Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy FOs to possibly get $20k retention!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2015, 08:38 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by jdflyer1999 View Post
No current order.

Parker stated that the 190's will either grow or go away.
No order, but under evaluation. Might be a different aircraft depending on the deal and the 190's WOULD go away. They have some time, but not much to bust a move. Right now, they have enough burden introducing and adding new aircraft to AA, not to mention debt. I think a decision will have to be forthcoming by year's end.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 09:31 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

From my understanding, from someone "in the know" (take that for what you will... All I know is this is what they said), AAG and UAL are both looking at "very large" orders of 100 - 150 seat jets to offset the anticipated shrinking of their regionals over the next 3 to 5 years. I know they said UAL is looking very closely at the new Bombardier C-Series, and that an "improved" E-190 may also be an option. They said AAG is likely looking at the same and I would imagine DAL too. I did ask if they knew anything about the MRJ and they said they "didn't know" but thought it would be doubtful mainline would buy anything with the name Mitsubishi attached to it.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 12:53 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Why is it beneath them?
buddies8 is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 04:02 AM
  #54  
Fly-curious
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8 View Post
Why is it beneath them?
Maybe it's because Mitsubishi has never built a safe nor reliable civil aircraft in its history.
tvlawyer is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 05:24 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by tvlawyer View Post
Maybe it's because Mitsubishi has never built a safe nor reliable civil aircraft in its history.
C-Series! Bombardier needs orders. Perfect plane for American
billyho is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 05:35 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
From my understanding, from someone "in the know" (take that for what you will... All I know is this is what they said), AAG and UAL are both looking at "very large" orders of 100 - 150 seat jets to offset the anticipated shrinking of their regionals over the next 3 to 5 years. I know they said UAL is looking very closely at the new Bombardier C-Series, and that an "improved" E-190 may also be an option. They said AAG is likely looking at the same and I would imagine DAL too. I did ask if they knew anything about the MRJ and they said they "didn't know" but thought it would be doubtful mainline would buy anything with the name Mitsubishi attached to it.
AAG announced weeks ago they were looking at their E190 operation. It was either going to be discontinued, or greatly expanded.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 06:36 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,939
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
AAG announced weeks ago they were looking at their E190 operation. It was either going to be discontinued, or greatly expanded.
What about the 195? When you say 190 do you also mean 195?
tom11011 is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 01:38 PM
  #58  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader View Post
Someone made a post to say that Envoy has too many pilots and not to come here. Just wanted to share the other half of the paragraph the other OP did not, because it looks like FOs may get $20k. It deserves its own thread as much as the other topic does.
Okay folks, it's time to stop hiding behind the chainsaws
GET OUT NOW, GET IN THE RUNNING CAR
ENVOY BOOGIE MAN IS COMING FOR YOU!!
BWAAAAAAHHAAAAAAAA
https://youtu.be/Yrrw0wNLc2g
PublicPhone2 is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 06:33 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
I do know this- Fabregas can't give a retention bonus to a select group of already employeed pilots without giving it to all pilots. He can give a signing bonus to a new hire pilot, but that's the extent of it.

In the next 5 years 1/3 of all US airline pilots will retire. There is going to be winner and loser regional airlines, some are going to survive but many will not. When you are knee deep into a situation, sometimes its hard to see with clarity what's really going on. But from an outsiders point of view, I just don't see how anyone can see it any other way. Envoy is a shrinking airline with a top heavy labor structure. One way or the other the balance is going to be restored. The shareholders demand it.


There is no legitimate argument for pay being too high at any regional airline in the entire country. If anything, there are many signs that management has gone to far in cutting pay and benefits at all the regionals, and are just now starting to come to the realization that there are no longer thousands of eager beavers just waiting to work for peanuts.
As far as your shareholders go, the airlines are making more money than any time in recent history. Oil prices are down well over 50% from June of last year, and yet the airlines haven't dropped their fuel surcharges, or any of their other ancillary fees. Oil experts have predicted a chance of oil dropping even further as oil storage in the U.S. is believed to be at or above 80% of capacity countrywide.
There was never a need for any of the concessions recently taken by several of the regional pilot groups, and in fact the current staffing issues at many regionals would actually support the need for vast improvements in pay and benefits if those regionals hope to continue to operate.
Paid2fly is offline  
Old 04-03-2015, 07:36 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bedrock's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: ERJ, CA
Posts: 718
Default

The legitimate argument is that they are contractors, NOT mainline. Mainline is making the record profits, not the contractors. The regionals have very little room to do much under this model, that is why it is up to us, the pilots, to force change of that model. At ExpressJet, the pilots did stand up in the face of the race to the bottom and voted against pilots subsidizing a broken model and an inadequate management team. This act forced Skywest (who owns us) to start looking for other ways to save money, namely by increasing efficiency and by appointing better managers. Our refusal to cave, got the old mgmt fired! So change can happen.
bedrock is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
82
03-25-2020 05:55 AM
Crawl
Envoy Airlines
553
10-09-2014 10:36 AM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
48
02-03-2014 09:52 AM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 09:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices