Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wheels falling off at RAH >

Wheels falling off at RAH

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wheels falling off at RAH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2015, 04:29 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin View Post
My prediction is within the next year or two you will see a major softening of the 1500hr rule. You'll see it knocked down to something like 500 hours in leiu of 16 Sim sessions and minimum 100% hours of ioe. The crisis is beginning and the government won't sit on their hands and watch the nations airlines crumble.
Colgan 3407 is as fresh as if people lost their family yesterday. Those with lost family will raise hell before you see congress pass new legislation.
FLYZERG is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 04:59 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by FLYZERG View Post
Colgan 3407 is as fresh as if people lost their family yesterday. Those with lost family will raise hell before you see congress pass new legislation.
Oh Yes, Because flight hours had everything to do with that crash.
billyho is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 05:11 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by FLYZERG View Post
Colgan 3407 is as fresh as if people lost their family yesterday.

Those with lost family will raise hell before you see congress pass new legislation.

So will Sully Sullenberger and Jeff Skiles, who have proven to be eloquent, outstanding advocates for both safety as well as our profession.

Quoting Sen. Charles Schumer during the recent congressional subcommittee hearing on lowering ATP standards, to Mzzzzzz. Black (representing the RAA):

"No disrespect, but we're going to go with the 20,000 hour pilot's opinion!"
.

Hearing FAA Reauthorization Airline Safety | Video | C-SPAN.org

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...ml#post1873132

Last edited by SayAlt; 05-10-2015 at 05:25 PM.
SayAlt is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 05:22 PM
  #14  
Gets Wednesdays Off
 
Humblepielot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter View Post
SkyWest has been bailing out CPZ on a daily basis for awhile now.
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Humblepielot is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 05:24 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 241
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
Oh Yes, Because flight hours had everything to do with that crash.
Public perception is reality.
FLYZERG is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 05:44 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
Oh Yes, Because flight hours had everything to do with that crash.
Actually, it played a big part. If both pilots were required to have ATP minimums when they were hired (experience) and other training issues, along with all of the other new rules (117), it is a 99.99999999% probability that it wouldn't have happened.
404yxl is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 05:52 PM
  #17  
Happy at PDT
 
Lvlng4Spd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by FLYZERG View Post
Public perception is reality.
That may be true, but another accident of that caliber could happen any day and it will. This time it is going to be a crew that has all that required "experience" and a perfect record. Crews are human and simply make very poor decisions outside the sim sometimes. Some people are good operators and not great aviators or situational managers. Those things will never change and you can't always catch them. Then what?
Lvlng4Spd is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 06:01 PM
  #18  
Happy at PDT
 
Lvlng4Spd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl View Post
Actually, it played a big part. If both pilots were required to have ATP minimums when they were hired (experience) and other training issues, along with all of the other new rules (117), it is a 99.99999999% probability that it wouldn't have happened.
More like a 50% probability. People with multiple initial and 121 ride failures are still being hired and are operating aircraft on a daily basis. Rules on commuting? Nope.
Lvlng4Spd is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 06:02 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: B737 F/O
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by Humblepielot View Post
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
+1. The poster you are responding to has obviously not been watching DCI performance too closely. Not worth my time explaining it to him or her, either.
LostInPA is offline  
Old 05-10-2015, 06:07 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 203
Default

If RAH would meet the pilot 60% of the way the company would be on a position to do better. 1500 rule will not go anywhere!! The companies need to pay more!!!
Whatmeworry is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zacaviator
Career Questions
17
03-11-2015 01:30 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
250 or point 65
Regional
15
09-10-2008 06:17 AM
KiloAlpha
Regional
52
04-02-2007 07:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices