Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wheels falling off at RAH >

Wheels falling off at RAH

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wheels falling off at RAH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2015, 11:19 AM
  #321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Default

Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg View Post
Actually you did. During the negotiations with Southwest the F9 guys wanted final approval of the seniority list. The bankruptcy judge rightfully thought that was foolish. Subsequent negotiations failed to reach an agreement even though many guys at F9 already had apps at Southwest (including pilots in the negotiating room) . Southwest then moved on to AirTran and F9 got RAH. Moral of the story, the one time F9 guys actually chose to fight for themselves they shouldn't have.
Not true, WN truly had no intention of buying F9. All WN wanted was to get a good look at their books before massively expanding into the DEN market. Pure brilliance on their part.
As for AirTran, WN was waiting to buy them. They had same fleet (737) and already had plans to axe the 717's. Frontier has no common type (all Airbus).
Luv2Rotate is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 03:19 PM
  #322  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Default

Originally Posted by Luv2Rotate View Post
Not true, WN truly had no intention of buying F9. All WN wanted was to get a good look at their books before massively expanding into the DEN market. Pure brilliance on their part.
As for AirTran, WN was waiting to buy them. They had same fleet (737) and already had plans to axe the 717's. Frontier has no common type (all Airbus).
Really don't want to argue but the "peak at the books" argument makes no sense. The books were more or less public record (F9 was in bankruptcy). If a company based in Denver could not make the market work why would Southwest take their business cues off that company? The "peek at the books" argument is made by pilots that refuse to acknowledge an undeniable truth: they squandered an excellent opportunity because of greed.

Also, why expand into Denver if you can cheaply aquire a "hometown company" that owns the most lucrative gates in that market? I couldn't have been that expensive, a regional bought them.

Southwest's CEO has publicly stated they have no problem being a two airframe fleet. They just had no need for a smaller airframe like the 717 (especially when Delta wanted them so badly).

Furthermore, if it was the intention of Southwest they could have quickly aquired F9 and slowly phased in the 737 while leasing/selling the extremely popular airframe that F9 already owned (exactly what they did with AirTran). Seemless.

The F9 drivers hosed themselves.

Ironically, Republic sold F9 to Inidgo for less than what Southwest offered to purchase them outright.

History sucks when it makes you look like a fool.
GoHomeLeg is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 03:39 PM
  #323  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg View Post
Really don't want to argue but the "peak at the books" argument makes no sense. The books were more or less public record (F9 was in bankruptcy). If a company based in Denver could not make the market work why would Southwest take their business cues off that company? The "peek at the books" argument is made by pilots that refuse to acknowledge an undeniable truth: they squandered an excellent opportunity because of greed.

Also, why expand into Denver if you can cheaply aquire a "hometown company" that owns the most lucrative gates in that market? I couldn't have been that expensive, a regional bought them.

Southwest's CEO has publicly stated they have no problem being a two airframe fleet. They just had no need for a smaller airframe like the 717 (especially when Delta wanted them so badly).

Furthermore, if it was the intention of Southwest they could have quickly aquired F9 and slowly phased in the 737 while leasing/selling the extremely popular airframe that F9 already owned (exactly what they did with AirTran). Seemless.

The F9 drivers hosed themselves.

Ironically, Republic sold F9 to Inidgo for less than what Southwest offered to purchase them outright.

History sucks when it makes you look like a fool.
Sound logic, but: yes the balance sheets...etc are public info, but southwest was looking to find out which specific routes/markets were their most profitable, load factors...etc and those are the ones southwest opened first
spaaks is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 03:55 PM
  #324  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks View Post
Sound logic, but: yes the balance sheets...etc are public info, but southwest was looking to find out which specific routes/markets were their most profitable, load factors...etc and those are the ones southwest opened first
Kind of funny that Johnny O at MESA got spanked for doing the exact same thing.

Aloha Airlines sues Mesa Air Group - Pacific Business News
Rahlifer is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 04:58 PM
  #325  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by FEtoFO View Post
RAHCONTRACTNOW should be back up soon. Should be some good info to counterbalance the company's propaganda


Btw 4 new-hires from January have been removed from the seniority list. Trouble during IOE?
Wow. So negotiations are that bad huh? At this point I would think the pilot group asking for the moon may not be unreasonable...because hey- it's that or what? Dissolution of RAH?
block30 is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 05:21 PM
  #326  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by block30 View Post
Wow. So negotiations are that bad huh? At this point I would think the pilot group asking for the moon may not be unreasonable...because hey- it's that or what? Dissolution of RAH?

That may be exactly where RAH is headed. Management has taken the stance theyd rather go out of business than pay pilots. You just cant fix stupid.
flyguy23 is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 06:06 PM
  #327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Default Wheels falling off at RAH

Originally Posted by FEtoFO View Post
RAHCONTRACTNOW should be back up soon. Should be some good info to counterbalance the company's propaganda


Btw 4 new-hires from January have been removed from the seniority list. Trouble during IOE?
Ohhhhhh. It's going to be back up soon.... what a difference.

When is the strike vote? Ahhhhhh never????

The new website should be called, "Shut it down now, and park every single aircraft!"

Last edited by MR JT8D; 05-27-2015 at 06:25 PM. Reason: Whatever.
MR JT8D is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 06:34 PM
  #328  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
That may be exactly where RAH is headed. Management has taken the stance theyd rather go out of business than pay pilots. You just cant fix stupid.
This is just unreal to watch from the cheap seats. Management does realize that each that goes by means more expense and effort to turn the ship around right? At some point you can reach the point of no return due to all the damage done...? Is RAH being sued for breach of contract for dropping too many flights?
block30 is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 06:41 PM
  #329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Default

No, they are playing you guys for fools. They have the aircraft orders and you guys have to call their bluff. You'll be flying for peanuts until the strike vote comes along. You guys have the weakest union on the history of the planet!!! Period.
MR JT8D is offline  
Old 05-27-2015, 06:47 PM
  #330  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Default

You guys should study Carl Marx. And pay attention to exactly what he's saying.
MR JT8D is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zacaviator
Career Questions
17
03-11-2015 01:30 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
250 or point 65
Regional
15
09-10-2008 06:17 AM
KiloAlpha
Regional
52
04-02-2007 07:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices