Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Horizon Air
What's happening at Horizon and Jets? >

What's happening at Horizon and Jets?

Search
Notices
Horizon Air Regional Airline

What's happening at Horizon and Jets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2015, 03:24 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: A321 - 39E
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit View Post
In 2013 we voted yes to a concessionary contract that runs for 5 years and we did vote to shrink down to transcons/ hawaii and a speck of central america.....

These 30 E175's may very well be the start of that happening. It seems there is a group of Alaska pilots concerned about this, but the majority seems to be too busy looking up at that big 2 in front of 10 year Captain pay to be thinking about whether or not their jobs are being outsourced.

That being said, what is the Alaska mainline/regional ratio and how does that compare to DAL, UAL, and AA? Seems like a lot more Alaska flying is done by mainline but that there is more growth on the "regional" level.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Phteven is offline  
Old 10-24-2015, 04:24 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: A321 - 39E
Posts: 312
Default What's happening at Horizon and Jets?

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Mainline jobs at Alaska are more at risk due to Delta's push on Seattle than stinking regional jets....

I don't think the two are unrelated. Alaska doesn't have the scope limitations of Delta so it could be a good financial move for them to outsource as much "regional" flying as possible, and given that Alaska's average stage length is around 800 miles, that could be A LOT of flying.

On top of that, if Delta does crush Alaska in Seattle, the most likely outcome would be some kind of merger which isn't the worst thing that could happen to Alaska mainline pilots. Slowly removing older, shorter range 737's and not hiring to fill attrition is a lot worse. Not saying that's happening here, but without scope, it could happen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Phteven is offline  
Old 10-24-2015, 04:25 PM
  #23  
Klsytakesit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Mainline jobs at Alaska are more at risk due to Delta's push on Seattle than stinking regional jets....
Likely you could be on to something there....of course the wide, standup 2-cabin class E-175 with a normal lavs and a galley that comes and goes from a regular height jetway is not anything near a "regional" jet
 
Old 10-24-2015, 05:10 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

But think of The E175, as freeing up a 737 that was doing a GEG turn to fly a route that can better compete with Delta.. Smart move. Faster acsess to expand central america...
amcnd is offline  
Old 10-24-2015, 05:58 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
snackysmores's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: fatigued
Posts: 1,397
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
Mainline jobs at Alaska are more at risk due to Delta's push on Seattle than stinking regional jets....
Delta doesn't give a **** about Alaska competition, DAL could bankrupt Alaska quickly if they wanted to. Simple, walk into a every Horizon crew room and offer the pilots a class date. They could take 30-40 a month if they wanted to. Good luck Brad finding pilots to do 40% of your domestic flying. Those pesky overpaid Horizon pilots...
snackysmores is offline  
Old 10-24-2015, 06:25 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: A321 - 39E
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
But think of The E175, as freeing up a 737 that was doing a GEG turn to fly a route that can better compete with Delta.. Smart move. Faster acsess to expand central america...

I would agree with you, but it isn't flying to GEG. It's flying to f---ing Texas. Hence, it is not a "regional" jet, it is a mainline class airplane that is just barely below the arbitrary cutoff of what defines a regional jet. It is a smart move from the shareholders perspective, replace mainline flying with "regional" flying done by cheaper crews. Don't believe the management emails about how this is only about competition with Delta. AAG isn't just "freeing up 737's," they are making a concerted effort to reduce labor costs through outsourcing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Phteven is offline  
Old 10-24-2015, 07:19 PM
  #27  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Regarding the E-Jets, it's only a "regional" airplane if the region is "North America."
pete2800 is offline  
Old 10-24-2015, 07:26 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: A321 - 39E
Posts: 312
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800 View Post
Regarding the E-Jets, it's only a "regional" airplane if the region is "North America."

Hawaii is part of the USA...how long until that is "regional" too? Seems "regional" means 76-seats or less. And here I thought seats were a measure of capacity, but I guess it's a unit of distance...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Phteven is offline  
Old 10-25-2015, 07:47 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Phteven View Post

That being said, what is the Alaska mainline/regional ratio and how does that compare to DAL, UAL, and AA? Seems like a lot more Alaska flying is done by mainline but that there is more growth on the "regional" level.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
From the 2014 10Ks
American Airlines | Investor Relations | SEC Filings
DAL 12.31.2014 10K
United - Investor Relations - SEC Filings
http://www.annualreports.com/Click/1020

Fleet Count at the end of 2014
DAL mainline 772 regional 499
AAL mainline 983 regional 566
UAL mainline 691 regional 566
ALK mainline 137 regional 59


Regional ASMs as a percentage of Consolidated ASMs

DAL 10.49%
AAL 10.59%
UAL 12.97%
ALK 10.11%
shfo is offline  
Old 10-25-2015, 08:42 AM
  #30  
Permanent Weekends Off
 
OnMyWay's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 660
Default

Has AAG announced how they plan on filling the gap between the Q400 and the 738? I don't recall them saying anything about it. I'd be worried more about that. 28% savings is a huge chunk of change for QX, even with how cheap we are. I'm going to go tin hat here, but here's what I think the board at AAG is hoping for(obviously just a thought):
Get QX to cut 28%
Order an array of aircraft to cover the gap (Embraer 175s and 190s)
Place them at a regional to fly (notice how I didn't say just QX?)
Take a portion of the 28% savings and give the Alaska pilots some as a bribe to go along with this.
Every few years revisit the whipsaw to order more large regional jets to replace Alaska mainline flying.

All this is obviously hypothetical based on both pilot groups going along with this which is more far fetched than my above theory.

Fire away.
OnMyWay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Harry Tasker
Horizon Air
790
12-03-2015 09:02 AM
brewpilot
Horizon Air
262
06-26-2012 10:07 AM
tyrael37
Horizon Air
72
05-18-2008 07:58 PM
Flyin1500
Regional
14
05-24-2007 07:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices