PSA info
05-04-2016, 01:13 PM
#2544
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 742
Originally Posted by Just a guy
Saw that email. Does anyone remember what that was exactly?
And duty time extensions???? Forget it! Not even if it helps me and my crew to get home! I'd rather cancel the flight, stick the company with 4 more hotel rooms, and get us all some junior man pay the next day.
05-04-2016, 01:14 PM
#2545
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Originally Posted by penaltybox
$2,500 paid out quarterly over 2 years.
I guess Envoy should have held out and asked for more, rather than taking it. I am sure it will be PSA's fault that it went down this way.
05-04-2016, 01:20 PM
#2546
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by daOldMan
And other concessions from the company from what I hear. A bunch of good stuff.
I guess Envoy should have held out and asked for more, rather than taking it. I am sure it will be PSA's fault that it went down this way.
I guess Envoy should have held out and asked for more, rather than taking it. I am sure it will be PSA's fault that it went down this way.
Just an email saying mec took the offer. No details really except the 250/mo for in base hotels for commuters. Would like to see what we gave too.
05-04-2016, 01:23 PM
#2547
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
It does make me wonder what changed the MECs mind? And it also makes me wonder what the company has up it's sleeve to make it want to push these retention bonuses so hard despite the fact that we are apparently "hiring for attrition"? Perhaps some bad news is also on the way? I see this as a way to keep FOs from making lateral moves, but not to keep FOs from moving on to something better. It will however lift morale quite a bit I think.
05-04-2016, 01:39 PM
#2548
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,547
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
It does make me wonder what changed the MECs mind? And it also makes me wonder what the company has up it's sleeve to make it want to push these retention bonuses so hard despite the fact that we are apparently "hiring for attrition"? Perhaps some bad news is also on the way? I see this as a way to keep FOs from making lateral moves, but not to keep FOs from moving on to something better. It will however lift morale quite a bit I think.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
