I knew it! UFOs shot it down. Her reasons for not coming forward earlier don't even make any sense.

They, his Canadian flight school, fired him for appearing on TV dressed like Bob and Doug Mackenzie? Hosers.

Actually, the Russians didn't foil it. Thanks to recent declassification of many details about Project Azorian, we now know that the Hughes Glomar Explorer's retrieval claw failed because of Lockheed's design decision to use maraging steel, which, while very strong, proved too brittle to support the Soviet submarine's weight. Had they selected a more ductile metal, the claw may not have fractured, causing 2/3 of ascending the submarine to tumble back down to the ocean floor:
Although the Soviets were tipped off that a CIA recovery operation was underway, and they did send ships to the area (two of which visited the Hughes Glomar Explorer's work site), the Russians 1) didn't know exactly where their sunken submarine was located, and 2) didn't believe recovery was actually possible. The Russian tracking ship and tug that visited Project Azorian's worksite didn't foil—or even significantly disrupt—the operation. They left the area before the Glomar's capture vehicle even reached the target object [=the sub]. Indeed, Project Azorian really only went totally sideways later, and for reasons entirely of our own making.

Lessons learned: Don't use a giant claw made of maraging steel if you want to resurrect MH370, in its entirety, from the ocean floor.

Possible debris.

The usual mainstream media caveats apply.

MH370: wreckage found on Reunion 'matches Malaysia Airlines flight' - Telegraph

Australia: Reunion Island debris “consistent with analysis” of MH370 resting place
Karen Walker Jul 29, 2015
The Australian government has issued a statement on the discovery of debris on Reunion Island in the Indian Ocean July 29 and which is being examined to determine whether it comes from missing Malaysia Airlines MH370, a Boeing 777-200.

The debris, measuring about 2 meters, appears similar to the wing flap of a large commercial airliner. Because the debris was retrieved on a French-owned island, it is now in the possession of French authorities.

In a statement late July 29 US time – July 30 in Australia – the Ministry for Infrastructure said, “the debris is being examined by experts to determine its origin. Malaysia is responsible for the investigation and is managing this examination with the assistance of Boeing, the BEA (Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la Sécurité de l'Aviation Civile), the National Transportation Safety Bureau (US) and the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

“In the event that the wreckage is identified as being from MH370 on La Reunion Island, it would be consistent with other analysis and modelling that the resting place of the aircraft is in the southern Indian Ocean.

“Any new evidence will be used to further inform and refine ongoing search efforts.”

MH370 disappeared March 8, 2014, after apparently diverting far from its scheduled flight path from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. There were 239 people onboard. A massive search has been ongoing in the Indian Ocean after satellite data indicated the aircraft likely headed west, then south over the Indian Ocean, where it is believed to have eventually crashed. But there have been no findings of any part of the aircraft despite a massive search effort involving multiple countries, military forces, organizations and advanced technologies.

Share This Article
EMAIL


Please log in or register to post comments.

RELATED ARTICLES
Aircraft debris from Indian Ocean to be tested for MH370 link
ATSB: Area in vicinity of acoustic detections ‘discounted as final resting place’ for MH370
1
Debris off Australian coast is “credible lead” on MH370 search
2
MH370 search area off Australian coast intensifies; China reports debris satellite image

Despite MH370 mystery, Clark still confident in 777

MH370 search: Reunion debris to be tested in France - BBC News

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cps...ion_624map.png

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0QA1KC20150805

http://abcnews.go.com/beta/Internati...ry?id=32901960

I still think the "constant radius from the satellite" theory is off, and that it crashed closer to Reunion, hence the debris.

The last three radar hits line up more with Reunion and Madagascar than Australia.

Malaysia is saying it is definitely Mh370; France is only saying it is definitely from a 777.