Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
De-iced procedure failure >

De-iced procedure failure

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

De-iced procedure failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2016, 05:18 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Purely hypothetical- "If" someone (such as the OP) had the requisite knowledge, training and experience on the certificate holder's approved de-ice/anti-ice procedures, and believes they were not followed correctly, he/she should consider informing the PIC by every means available. Without having all the facts, this is very difficult to assess. However, This type of situation "could" be a significant safety issue. If the company has an organization-wide safety reporting system (SMS)- I would also encourage anyone to submit a report.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 02-07-2016, 08:01 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I don't know any major carrier that uses type I. In fact type I is hardly used. Most carriers use type IV for both deice and anti ice. The fluid usually has a color to it. The flight crew looks at a deice table to decide how long the fluid is effective for the current weather conditions.
Then you don't know much. I know a carrier that almost exclusively uses Type 1. In fact, only two of their stations even have Type 4. You should avoid sweeping generalizations.
Packrat is offline  
Old 02-07-2016, 08:03 PM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I don't know any major carrier that uses type I. In fact type I is hardly used. Most carriers use type IV for both deice and anti ice. The fluid usually has a color to it. The flight crew looks at a deice table to decide how long the fluid is effective for the current weather conditions.

Huh??? This is out to lunch...we use type I all the time, applied by DAL and UAL stations. It is applied hot as a de-ice fluid.

Type IV is applied cold, and is a protective anti-ice fluid. It is viscous and sticks to the plane until it blows off on T/O...that's why it's applied cold. And when applied cold it cannot do much to remove existing ice.

There are a lot of possible variations on de-ice/anti-ice, but the most common is hot type 1 to de-ice, and then cold type 4 if needed for anti-ice.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-07-2016, 08:24 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I don't know any major carrier that uses type I. In fact type I is hardly used. Most carriers use type IV for both deice and anti ice. The fluid usually has a color to it. The flight crew looks at a deice table to decide how long the fluid is effective for the current weather conditions.
Um...what? It's the other way around, type I is used most of the time, because most of the time all that is necessary is to decontaminate the airplane. Holdover time and ground icing conditions are much more rare than having to decontaminate and in some ground-icing conditions the short holdover time of type I is just fine. Maybe things are different in some other locale/region.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:28 AM
  #25  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,504
Default

Heated Type II/IV is allowed for deicing in lieu of Type I...the FBO in GFK had their deice truck break down in the middle of a snowstorm a few years back and the FBO borrowed Delta's deice truck...which was a hot then cold Type II application.

I didn't know Type II was even still used, and specifically asked if they meant Type IV...they were adamant it was Type II.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 06:21 AM
  #26  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Heated Type II/IV is allowed for deicing in lieu of Type I...the FBO in GFK had their deice truck break down in the middle of a snowstorm a few years back and the FBO borrowed Delta's deice truck...which was a hot then cold Type II application.

I didn't know Type II was even still used, and specifically asked if they meant Type IV...they were adamant it was Type II.
Type II still exists, but it's relatively rare in the US.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 10:59 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Fletcheroes View Post
Let's rephrase the question. What would you guys do if you were dead heading or non rev on this aircraft.

You were at the gate and observed the aircraft for several hours prior to departure.

You observed the deice operation from your seat at the wing.
I don't know about ya'll but every time there is freezing rain in TAFs and with the 3 hr rule, nearly all airlines proactively cancel flights. I doubt you taxiied out for 3 hrs in active freezing rain.

Light freezing rain has holdover times. Anything more than light, you're in no man territory and will be returning to the gate and cancelling unless the freezing rain lets up.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 11:01 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I don't know any major carrier that uses type I. In fact type I is hardly used. Most carriers use type IV for both deice and anti ice. The fluid usually has a color to it. The flight crew looks at a deice table to decide how long the fluid is effective for the current weather conditions.
Huh? Nearly everyone in the US uses type 1 and type IV. Type 1 if just to remove contaminant and there's no precip/visible moisture present; and a full type 1 + type 4 for active precip/moisture.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:31 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Lantis 838 k-loader/Freightliner FL70
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Huh? Nearly everyone in the US uses type 1 and type IV. Type 1 if just to remove contaminant and there's no precip/visible moisture present; and a full type 1 + type 4 for active precip/moisture.
THIS is correct.

Delta-trained deicing operator at major Delta hub speaking here.

I've been trying to figure out what exactly Type II is and what it was used for. I think it's considered obsolete and I'm not sure why anyone uses it, anywhere.
Flying Low is offline  
Old 02-08-2016, 05:04 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7Xdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Captian, G450, G550 (Ret.)
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by Fletcheroes View Post
Keep in mind my "observation" next time your being de-iced by a contractor that pays the deice crew 8.00/hr and might have a high school diploma.
Ok....are you admitting something else here??
7Xdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kayco
United
190
08-07-2022 12:19 PM
2StgTurbine
Technical
32
10-30-2015 12:24 PM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
2
09-12-2010 02:31 PM
tralika
Flight Schools and Training
12
03-17-2010 10:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices