Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Fedex Pilots proposed retirement plan >

Fedex Pilots proposed retirement plan

Notices

Fedex Pilots proposed retirement plan

Old 08-19-2017, 03:21 AM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
The guys who have 25 years of service and their high five have absolutely nothing to lose in their scenario of freezing the current A plan. They can only go up with adding another defined benefit plan to the current A plan. Guys who stand a lot to lose are those who were hired at a later stage in life and will never get 25 years of service or perhaps even a high five of $260. Pilots who are out on LTD could also be adversely affected in a similar fashion.

This effort is being led by pilots with nothing to lose and desperately trying to get some kind of bump in their retirement benefits before they hit 65. That would be ok if they also get real improvements for everybody else, but I'm not convinced that will happen.

Even if the company were shown these plans and they were able to save money and increase our benefits I'm not convinced they would do it. Either out of spite or for company morale. How could they justify increasing our defined benefit plans after freezing everybody else's just a few years ago? I think the fallout from such a maneuver is why the company refused to consider it in the last contract negotiation.

I'm also not sure this pilot group (57% of whom voted for the current contract) will have the fortitude to vote something new down that really doesn't increase every pilot's benefits. A lot of pilots are prejudiced against A plans because they or somebody they know lost theirs due to bankruptcy and that is a valid concern. They hear A plan and instinctively think it will never be there for them and will take any B plan bump to cast away the A plan.

We all know that its not possible to replace that $130K per year with B fund bumps under current IRS limits. I'll take the small risk of FedEx going bankrupt in the next 20-30 years over taking on all of the investment risk myself over that same time frame. I've got the B plan and my personal savings to put in the market to augment the A plan and that is enough personal risk for me.

This may have been you best post on here, I knew you had it in you.
StarClipper is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 05:50 AM
  #242  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
Hub turn message was the union plans to get more info out in 2-3 weeks

They are looking at two new plans to "replace" the current A fund.

A "variable accrual" plan or a "variable benefit" plan.

No talk of increasing B fund (like UPS) and keeping current A fund

No talk of making A fund changes similar to what UPS did in their last negotiation

It's clear the union leadership has put in a lot of monetary and emotional capital into researching these new options and the train is about to leave the station

Some are asking why other options to increase overall retirement, without changing to a whole new A fund construct, aren't being discussed, surveyed or offered...???

How limited/focused will the pilot survey be?

Will it lead pilots to a choice between options 1 and 2 --- while in reality options 3, 4 and 5 may also exist?
Thank you for that explanation, DLax85. I think it will be telling about what comes of your last point, about the survey. Will they phrase it as only choices between the options that they are invested in, and afterwards conclude that they are only doing what we directed? Sounds like age 65 rule change all over again.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 05:53 AM
  #243  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
What did you really get out of that contract? Most of the people who vote for it did so because they were either tired of waiting, or accepted the "that the best we will get" coolaid. They didn't vote for it because it was a good contract, so keep fooling yourself. A good contract don't get voted in by such a small margin.
It is obvious you are just trolling this thread trying to be irrelevant and combative to get a reaction. Could you find something else to do?
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 06:23 AM
  #244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
This may have been you best post on here, I knew you had it in you.
I think your mom said it's time to clean your room.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 07:20 AM
  #245  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
A good contract don't get voted in by such a small margin.
Actually, it's best if even a fabulous contract is only approved by one vote. That helps you manage the company's expectations.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 07:40 AM
  #246  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by pinseeker View Post
I think your mom said it's time to clean your room.
Not need for the disrespect, leave people moms and kids out
StarClipper is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 07:43 AM
  #247  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12 View Post
It is obvious you are just trolling this thread trying to be irrelevant and combative to get a reaction. Could you find something else to do?
I'm not trolling, I'm going based on some of FDXLAG previous posts during contract negotiations
StarClipper is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 08:32 AM
  #248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
I'm not trolling, I'm going based on some of FDXLAG previous posts during contract negotiations
Still waiting, I know you must have a super contract you are willing to tell us about.
Fdxlag2 is offline  
Old 08-19-2017, 09:01 AM
  #249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,820
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
I'm not trolling, I'm going based on some of FDXLAG previous posts during contract negotiations
Obviously a troll. Won't say which airline he/she works for. Poor grasp of grammar. Can't tell the difference between FXDX and FDXLAG.
pinseeker is offline  
Old 10-14-2017, 09:35 AM
  #250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by StarClipper View Post
This may have been you best post on here, I knew you had it in you.
"The MEC authorized the Negotiating Committee to meet with management to introduce the variable benefit concept to management and their actuaries. We fully anticipate that they will need time to digest and consider the plan concept before any consideration of future bargaining. Our discussion with management is scheduled to occur later this month."

Here we go... leg's of its own now! The road to hell is paved with good intentions...! Unanimous?? WOW!

Am I overreacting in my head about this, because I'm not seeing any reaction on the board here...?
Flaps50 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Albief15
Cargo
69
07-03-2015 09:59 AM
steamgauge
Cargo
95
03-24-2013 05:55 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices