Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Hand Propping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2018, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Day puke
Thread Starter
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default Hand Propping

I was watching The Great Waldo Pepper for the zillionth time and noticed something about how they hand propped.

Rather than pulling through an intake and compression cycle clockwise (pilot's view), they pulled it counter clockwise. When the crank was at or near TDC of the exhaust stroke, the prop was released, and the compressed air kicked the engine through a firing/ignition cycle. Is this the norm? Or is it only done on some engines?
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 06-30-2018, 05:45 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH View Post
Is this the norm? Or is it only done on some engines?
No idea. But notice the prop bolted right to the engine case in the video example attached?


[URL="http://www.military.com/video/aircraft/engines/starting-up-a-ww1-rotary-engine/3812381667001"]
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-01-2018, 04:41 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

That defines a rotary engine At least before Wankel took over the term.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 07-01-2018, 04:55 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
That defines a rotary engine At least before Wankel took over the term.
I think I see what you mean. Except the whole crankcase spins, wild. Never noticed before.
METO Guido is offline  
Old 07-01-2018, 06:15 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

They were good in that the engine stayed cool running on the ground since the cylinders had airflow all the time. They bled oil and the torque issues were 'interesting.'
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 07-01-2018, 08:44 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,228
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
They were good in that the engine stayed cool running on the ground since the cylinders had airflow all the time. They bled oil and the torque issues were 'interesting.'
I imagine they also had more engine inertia than other piston engines, possibly turbojet-like response (which is not good).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-01-2018, 02:28 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

Early inline engines had a flywheel to balance out the power strokes. The rotary engine had a better power to weight ratio since the case and cylinders did double duty as a flywheel.

Some of the early rotary engines were controlled by turning the ignition on and off. This led to fouled spark plugs. Later ones had primitive throttle and mixture controls and it was better to shut the fuel off and keep the plugs firing on approach to landing. The ones I've heard at air shows power right up when started, nothing like JT3C response.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 07-05-2018, 08:34 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

Here’s a good video of a currently operation original Camel.

https://youtu.be/Hq78ZocOAkY
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-05-2018, 11:16 PM
  #9  
Airborne bus driver
 
RadialGal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: my seat smells funny
Posts: 221
Default

Recently got to see a 100 percent authentic Sopwith Pup do a full power runup. Complete with Blps and Castor oil a plenty.

I remember hand propping my first plane. It was a tiny little T-crate. My Instructor (tailwheel rating) was an old Pelican Airline Pilot. I, a freshly minted Commercial Pilot. The crate had no electrical system, so she had to be hand-propped. He got in the cockpit, made all the right calls, and I flung the blade like I had seen in all those King/Jeppesen videos.

Welllllllll, I thought I did; but I didn't. I flung it like I was holding onto a 3 ft chainsaw at full power. I backed away as if it were radioactive. He just laughed at me. "Crucified Christ! It's not an F-16 inlet!" Over and over I flung it like it was a rabid dog, like it had Ebola.......I was simply terrified for some reason. Then he got out, rolled his eyes dramatically and said "stand right next to me." He chocked the bird, came over, grabbed the prop like he had flown her for for 25 years (which he had) and did the old Waldo Pepper fling. The engine popped to life immediately. I stood right next to him, less than a foot from the prop......and was unharmed. I quickly loss my fear after that (and have hand propped many birds since)

How many Millenials (sadly I am one) have hand propped a bird? I wonder?

RadialGal
RadialGal is offline  
Old 07-06-2018, 02:39 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

Being an old J-3 guy, the mistake most make is standing too far away. If you lose your balance you will fall forward. (Not good). Stand close in, and you will fall backward and that big baby will roll right over you. If you are complete chicken ******* you can seaplane prop from the right rear.

Last edited by badflaps; 07-06-2018 at 02:40 AM. Reason: speling
badflaps is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices