Search
Notices

Alaska and Jetblue??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2019, 07:33 AM
  #31  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,583
Default

Originally Posted by aldonite7667 View Post
No merger will take place while airlines are making gobs and gobs of money. Why upset the investor apple cart if you don’t need to?
UA is the least profitable of the Big 3 and investor pressure to change that. Our financials are solid, RASM on Mint flying is healthy. Good cash on hand. If they wait til conditions are more favorable to a merger then there could be a bidding war for B6.

Originally Posted by ProPilotBlue View Post
So about that. Alaska took on a whole pile of debt to get VX. Would a merged Alaska/JetBlue be in a worse-off place than if JetBlue had won that merger instead? I'm worried that a merged Alaska/JetBlue would be financially worse-off than if we stayed separate.
I think that's a fair concern
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 07:36 AM
  #32  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,879
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5 View Post
Cue the “Delta and Jetblue?” thread.
To my knowledge, Delta did not make an actual offer, but had considered it.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 07:38 AM
  #33  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Airbus Capt
Posts: 6,879
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
UA is the least profitable of the Big 3 and investor pressure to change that. Our financials are solid, RASM on Mint flying is healthy. Good cash on hand. If they wait til conditions are more favorable to a merger then there could be a bidding war for B6.



I think that's a fair concern
It's also very likely a different presidential administration would make a merger even more difficult. IF something is to happen with the big 3, it would happen sooner than later. IF.
Bluedriver is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 09:04 AM
  #34  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,583
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver View Post
It's also very likely a different presidential administration would make a merger even more difficult. IF something is to happen with the big 3, it would happen sooner than later. IF.
+1

Without getting too political, 2020 isn't very far away and there could possibly be drastic changes to the administration at that point.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 09:19 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,099
Default

Agreed. Opinions are favorable but 2020 may not be. Perhaps that is why jetblue continues to threaten the establishment.
benzoate is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:18 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,122
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
UA is the least profitable of the Big 3 and investor pressure to change that. Our financials are solid, RASM on Mint flying is healthy. Good cash on hand. If they wait til conditions are more favorable to a merger then there could be a bidding war for B6.



I think that's a fair concern
Good point.
aldonite7667 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:20 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,122
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne View Post
It’s because of mergers airlines are making gobs and gobs of money.
We have less airlines now vs the time before deregulation.
I partially agree. airlines are running better businesses since deregulation too. They were forced into working for their money.
aldonite7667 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:35 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Papa Bear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 323
Default

You would be nuts coming to Blew jet...If you have any aspirations for your career stay clear. I’m sure we hired our last Airbus Captain 2014 sometime.
Papa Bear is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:43 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
If they wait til conditions are more favorable to a merger then there could be a bidding war for B6.
There will be a bidding war so furious it would make the VX one look like childs play, whenever it comes.

To the OP: majority of employees at B6 would enthusiastically embrace a merger with Alaska, or anyone else for that matter except the ULCCs.
Bluetruth is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:47 AM
  #40  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,583
Default

Originally Posted by Bluetruth View Post
There will be a bidding war so furious it would make the VX one look like childs play, whenever it comes.

To the OP: majority of employees at B6 would enthusiastically embrace a merger with Alaska, or anyone else for that matter except the ULCCs.
Absolutely agree. In the same way that AS was forced to spend a lot to buy VX in order to prevent B6 from being too strong, AA for instance could be forced to spend $$$ to prevent UA from being too strong. Maybe toss WN into the mix because this would be their last chance to get a northeast presence. Or DL, just to control the divestiture of JFK/LGA assets. Maybe even AS because they need to grow outside of the west coast. Hell, is it crazy to think someone like EK would want to jump in with a 25% bid? Or is it crazier to think Neeleman would raise enough funds to take B6 private and under his control?

And now thinking about the company buying back billions of stock makes more sense...
Flyby1206 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyin1500
Alaska
64
10-23-2023 06:14 PM
WARich
Mergers and Acquisitions
25
10-12-2022 07:40 AM
Work4life
JetBlue
24
01-26-2016 06:13 PM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
vagabond
Major
66
03-24-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices