Notices

Ual aip

Old 11-22-2015, 08:41 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Sr. Barco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 495
Default Ual aip

In case anyone hasn't see this. Essentially their top 737 pay will match our failed TA1 top pay except 1 year earlier. I think the economics of our TA2 just went up.

This is from ualpilotsforum.org from a reliable source

Duration 2 years amendable on 1/31/19

• 1/1/16 16% raise
• 1/1/17 3% raise
• 1/1/18 2% (this may be off a percentage one way or the other)

• DAL ME TOO PAY RATE CLAUSE – Whatever DAL gets in terms of pay rates during the 24 months of extension (strictly pay rates, i.e., not for bonuses), the UAL pay rates go to that number.

• LOA 25 pilots made whole. 39 million dollar bucket distribution determined by ALPA.

• MOU 22 Language changes. Concept of company buying insurance policy, i.e., if they make an offer and pilot accepts he gets the add pay no matter what happens, changes to the pilot only gets the add pay IF in the actual operation the pilot goes over FAR 117 time. Also, if one pilot refuses to waive and the others do, they can fly the airplane home (this applies only to N. Atlantic operation).

• FRMS - agreement but no details revealed. Suspect that most international flights that are now critical in terms of CCO times (i.e., DEL, BOM, EWR-HKG, etc.) will be extended such that MOU 22 would be irrelevant.

• Apparently no concessions on SCOPE

• Apparently No Reserve improvements
Sr. Barco is offline  
Old 11-23-2015, 04:08 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Default

Voting NO pending the final terms.

Why?

Because our idiot master chariman is horrible poker player and couldn't have even though of other items that needed to be fixed in our contract. The company came to us first and only wanted to talk about 5 items on THEIR list...

So, we wont be able to fix anything else for at least three years..Why does the company want to extend this contract?

They are betting on the come that in three or more years their profitability will be lower.

Anyway, I predict it passes at least 67/33
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 11-30-2015, 05:37 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

If true...Effective Jan 2016

737...............$245
767...............$254
77/78/747......$305
jsled is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 07:29 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sparta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 149
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
If true...Effective Jan 2016

737...............$245
767...............$254
77/78/747......$305
These rates while keeping profit sharing (about one month's pay check in 2015) and 16% B fund (including spillover to a Retiree Health Account when contributions exceed $53,000/year).
Sparta is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 07:49 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Thumbs up

Meanwhile the concessionary parts of our contract will live on for another 3-5 years minimum...

It will take more than a 13 percent raise for me to vote yes, living with the warts of two dissimilar pre merger contracts and the vestiges of the LUAL bankruptcy contract..

If you don't know what those things are, you are not as informed as you will need to be to make a proper voting decision.

Good luck to us all.
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 06:11 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Don't worry Bro. Myself and about 70% of the rank and file will vote yes....if given the chance. Then you can enjoy the pay raise, and still beat your chest about how you voted no. You're welcome.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 06:26 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
Don't worry Bro. Myself and about 70% of the rank and file will vote yes....if given the chance. Then you can enjoy the pay raise, and still beat your chest about how you voted no. You're welcome.

Sled
I bet its 73/27 No chest beating from me. I did vote YES (twice) on C-2012.

And you missed the point of my post above. But I guess a blind zest to vote yes will do that.

Its pretty much the way scope had been given away since I was a new hire when UAL only had 7 regional jets named by N number in our contract. Pilots turned right to section 3 and based their votes on that only...

Good luck.
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 06:49 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
I bet its 73/27 No chest beating from me. I did vote YES (twice) on C-2012.

And you missed the point of my post above. But I guess a blind zest to vote yes will do that.

Its pretty much the way scope had been given away since I was a new hire when UAL only had 7 regional jets named by N number in our contract. Pilots turned right to section 3 and based their votes on that only...

Good luck.
There were 18 Air Willy 146's. Not 7. You want the N numbers? I was here for that, too. The 1997 RJ side letter was not about section 3. More about keeping up with AMR and DAL. Now, contract 2000 did expand them somewhat. Maybe that's what you're talking about?
jsled is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 07:00 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Wink

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
There were 18 Air Willy 146's. Not 7. You want the N numbers? I was here for that, too. The 1997 RJ side letter was not about section 3. More about keeping up with AMR and DAL. Now, contract 2000 did expand them somewhat. Maybe that's what you're talking about?
Ok, it was more than 7. If I wasn't so lazy, i would have gone upstairs and looked it up.

Again you missed the point of my post.
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 12-02-2015, 07:10 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
Ok, it was more than 7. If I wasn't so lazy, i would have gone upstairs and looked it up.

Again you missed the point of my post.
You're right. You lost me at "idiot MC"
jsled is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
untied
United
119
09-03-2013 12:44 PM
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
TruthHurts
United
48
04-04-2012 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices