Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Technical The airliners we fly

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-24-2007, 11:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
squawkoff
 
Posts: n/a
Default No Transponder in RVSM Airspace

I'm a controller at ZFW. We have been told that an aircraft in RVSM airspace is still RVSM capable if it looses its transponder. The equipment qualifier is an ATC assigned /H . I was under the impression that one of the requirements of operating in RVSM airspace, among many, is TCAS that is approved for RVSM. An aircraft that doesn't have a transponder or Mode C for that matter is invisible to other TCAS equipped aircraft. My question is will the TCAS system still talk to one another even with the transponder inop? Does TCAS get the information on the host aircraft from the transponder or from the Air Data Computer? I argued that the aircraft was no longer RVSM capable without a functioning transponder and mode? Management told me I was wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 11:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 3,872
Default

"The following equipment is required to be operating prior to entering RVSM airspace:
• Two independent primary altimeter systems
• One automatic altitude hold system
• One altitude alerting device
• Transponder (altitude reporting)"

This is cut and pasted right out of our ops manual. And, though it's not listed above, the MEL does say no RVSM if the TCAS is inop. Most RVSM aircraft are going to have two transponders, though. You could "lose one", turn the other one on, and still been okay for RVSM.
__________________
Go here to see how I became a UPS pilot:

www.jetcareers.com/content/view/65/132/
de727ups is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 01:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
squawkoff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm talking no transponder at all. In your case both are inop. I say the aircraft is no longer RVSM capable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 02:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 3,872
Default

"I say the aircraft is no longer RVSM capable."

I agree and both my FAA approved flight ops manual and my FAA approved MEL do, too.
__________________
Go here to see how I became a UPS pilot:

www.jetcareers.com/content/view/65/132/
de727ups is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 06:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: XJT CA
Posts: 300
Default

I agree, no longer capable of RVSM. Of course, you could inform ATC and they could make the excpetion time/traffic permitting. But even in that case, you're still not technically RVSM capable. At least that the way I understand it.
Bloodhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 07:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
squawkoff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Three exception to operating in RVSM airspace without the proper equipment. 1. Lifeguard 2. Military 3. RVSM certification test flights. As far as I know there are no other exception.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 10:59 PM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloodhound View Post
I agree, no longer capable of RVSM. Of course, you could inform ATC and they could make the excpetion time/traffic permitting. But even in that case, you're still not technically RVSM capable. At least that the way I understand it.
They, (ATC), will probably be the first ones to notice that that your transponder is TU. The world is a whole lot prettier at FL280 and below anyway
fbh
__________________
Rose tints my world and keeps me safe from trouble and pain.
frozenboxhauler is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
China RVSM Procedures MD11driver Cargo 31 10-21-2007 10:40 PM
MD-11 Pilots + China RVSM Huck Cargo 3 10-21-2007 01:15 AM
FAA Reauth. Bill and RLA status KnightFlyer Cargo 49 10-11-2007 02:14 PM
Unmanned 727's at FDX CloudSailor Cargo 35 10-10-2007 09:31 PM
DC airspace violator to appeal Gordon C Hangar Talk 1 05-31-2005 12:53 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7