Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Technical The airliners we fly

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2008, 05:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 475
Default Honeywell, Collins or Universal...

Which make and model FMS do you prefer?
__________________
Drill,nat. gas,nuclear,coal,wind,solar,wave&tidal
Elec. Cars and sell our oil to China/India
SmoothOnTop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 07:02 PM   #2 (permalink)
FT Aviation Hobbyist
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 2,421
Default

Having used all 3, I'll take Collins over any other. The ProLine series is the best out there.
FlyerJosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 07:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: DH8D
Posts: 1,297
Default

Ive only used the universal and I think it is a little quirky at times. There are many things that if done out of sequence will not work at all and many things get lost in a crossfill.
__________________
Honor, Courage, Commitment
usmc-sgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 07:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
FT Aviation Hobbyist
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 2,421
Default

Most universal's use direct entry inputs (vs a scratchpad). Most of them also lack the ability to confirm a change visually (dashed line) before it is actually executed in the flight plan. Both of those are big negatives from my POV.
FlyerJosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 07:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: DH8D
Posts: 1,297
Default

Very true Josh,
The only way we have to see if a change works is to do it on the NFP side and see how it looks and then either duplicate on the PF side or crossfill. If the PF is however doing a VNAV or a hold you can not crossfill because it will dump their VNAV or hold. Not very logical.
__________________
Honor, Courage, Commitment
usmc-sgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 08:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: F/A-18 FRS IP
Posts: 1,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyerJosh View Post
Having used all 3, I'll take Collins over any other. The ProLine series is the best out there.
FJ -

This question comes from a guy NOT familiar with the civilian avionics. When you are talking about FMSs (ProLine -vs- Honeywell for example) are we talking about the whole cockpit layout (the whole avionics package) or just one part of it? I recently sat in a Falcon 50EX that I thought had a Proline 21 cockpit but I hear that it might have been a Proline 4 - but the guy mentioned that the Falcon 2000 they were getting was coming with the EASy cockpit. I looked it up and it was a quite impressive cockpit! Also - talking to a guy who had a lot of time in both the Gulfstream line and Global Express - he thought the whole system onboard the Global was the best out there.
Am I off track with what this thread is addressing?

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 02:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Perma-FO
 
CL65driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Jungle Jet Gear Slinger
Posts: 889
Default

Collins takes the cake, hands down. The Honeywells in our planes at XE are so/so. I'm not entirely impressed by them. Although I hear the new Honeywells that come on the 170/190 are fairly nice.
CL65driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2008, 02:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: On Mil Leave
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
FJ -

This question comes from a guy NOT familiar with the civilian avionics. When you are talking about FMSs (ProLine -vs- Honeywell for example) are we talking about the whole cockpit layout (the whole avionics package) or just one part of it? I recently sat in a Falcon 50EX that I thought had a Proline 21 cockpit but I hear that it might have been a Proline 4 - but the guy mentioned that the Falcon 2000 they were getting was coming with the EASy cockpit. I looked it up and it was a quite impressive cockpit! Also - talking to a guy who had a lot of time in both the Gulfstream line and Global Express - he thought the whole system onboard the Global was the best out there.
Am I off track with what this thread is addressing?

USMCFLYR
When civilians compare FMS systems, its mainly about comparing FMS CDU's, the "Box."
blastoff is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honeywell info? Sperl0863 Corporate 11 09-18-2008 05:20 AM
Chris Collins leaving? automatique JetBlue 10 12-14-2005 12:51 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7