Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



FlightPod TV is now on APC!

Airline Pilot Central supports FlightPod TV and FlightPod Radio .

If you haven't seen FlightPod TV - you're missing out on timely and relevant aviation updates for you, the line pilot.

Visit FlightPod TV

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Technical The airliners we fly

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2009, 08:46 AM   #41 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubi352 View Post
Ryan I was just being a smart #$%. It's just that most pilots have only flown straight and level and can think only in this dimension. I just hate this representation of an aircraft with the four forces with lift going upward. That was just my point. Just like you said, lift has no relation to the ground yet we make it appear this way in every flight training books.

Up for another trivia question? From straight and level flight, what is the fastest way to accelerate? (be precise in the answer)
I got you bud, careful though cause the initial pull does have lift involved and wouldn't leave you at a no lift AOA. But I get what you mean once pointed up the cliff if you orient the nose to have no AOA or slightly negative in the case of a non symmetrical wing you can make the wing produce zero lift and thus no ground effect.

Next question, precise really? Point the nose down 90 degrees and if you want to die put in full power. When the wings rip off you will get a real good reduction in drag.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." Albert Einstein
shdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 10:47 AM   #42 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 230
Default

shdw, you got it

For the second part, you are half way there. I will give you a hint. It has to do with induced drag.
bubi352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 01:01 PM   #43 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubi352 View Post
shdw, you got it

For the second part, you are half way there. I will give you a hint. It has to do with induced drag.
Reduce to a zero lift AOA, I figured that was inherent with the push the nose over and align the direction straight down. I see what you mean by be specific now.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." Albert Einstein
shdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 01:50 PM   #44 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 230
Default

yep you got it. Pitching down with zero Gs unloads the wing generating no induced drag.
bubi352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 02:42 PM   #45 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: with the joint "RBI" group
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubi352 View Post
Ryan I was just being a smart #$%. It's just that most pilots have only flown straight and level and can think only in this dimension. I just hate this representation of an aircraft with the four forces with lift going upward. That was just my point. Just like you said, lift has no relation to the ground yet we make it appear this way in every flight training books.

Up for another trivia question? From straight and level flight, what is the fastest way to accelerate? (be precise in the answer)
To give the greatest acceleration you would pull back on the stick as hard as possible...loading the airplane with as many units of gravitational acceleration (g's) as possible.
__________________
If money can't buy happiness, you'll just have to rent it.
ryan1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 02:58 PM   #46 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 230
Default

The last thing you want to do to gain airspeed quickly is loading the wing. You should rather push forward on the stick for Zero Gs at full power.
bubi352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 04:14 PM   #47 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: with the joint "RBI" group
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubi352 View Post
The last thing you want to do to gain airspeed quickly is loading the wing. You should rather push forward on the stick for Zero Gs at full power.
You said accelerate... Refer to any aerobatics manual, physics, or engineering book to understand the concept in depth.
__________________
If money can't buy happiness, you'll just have to rent it.
ryan1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 10:46 AM   #48 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Furloughed. AGAIN!
Posts: 93
Default

A report I remember from a SSA Convention presentation:

[PDF] AIR FORCE- INSTITUTE ýOF- TECHNOLOGY

Glider Ground Effect Investigation
Thesis
Nathan H. Jones
Captain, USAF

They used a Blanik & a Grob glider in flight tests to investigate Ground Effect (at KEDW)

Last edited by 727gm : 10-19-2009 at 11:00 AM. Reason: Add. info
727gm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 04:58 PM   #49 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Default

RE: Thin Airfoil Theory

Note: I'm omitting equations and explaining things in terms that are hopefully understandable, because, well, no one likes equations.

There's some good reading on this topic here:
Thin Airfoil Theory

Basically, thin airfoil theory is a way of approximating the performance of a given airfoil to get the lift and moment coefficients for both symmetric and cambered airfoil.

Assumptions:
1. Thickness is neglected, but the derivation is still considered relevant for airfoils with a thickness-to-chord ratio of 10% or less.
2. Inviscid (approximately valid for Re >> 1)
3. Irrotational (fluid lines do not curl; they are parallel to one another at any given position at any moment in time)
4. Incompressible (that rules out anything moving faster than about M=0.3)

Basically it is only applicable to 2-D airfoils, not 3-D finite wings. This in turn neglects induced drag from wingtips, as well as a handful of other tip and root-interference related factors.

Basic steps to the derivation:
1. Place a vortex sheet along the chord line of an airfoil.

2. Calculate the variation of the vortex strength per unit length along the vortex sheet, such that the camber line becomes a streamline of the flow and the Kutta condition is satisfied at the trailing edge (vorticity strength = 0 at the trailing edge).

3. Obtain the velocity distribution due to vortex strength along the length of the airfoil.
4. Find pressure as a function of velocity.
5. Calculate the lift coefficient and the moment coefficient for the airfoil.

Conclusion
Thin airfoil theory provides a simple, practical, reliable method of calculating airfoil properties, within the limitations of its assumptions. It is extremely useful for designing and analyzing airfoils. All you need is the mean camber line for the airfoil, and you can calculate all of the important properties of that airfoil. The major weakness of thin airfoil theory is its inability to calculate drag; that must come from later analysis.
runge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 08:06 AM   #50 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: CFI
Posts: 1,979
Default

Thanks Runge.

If someone wants a mathematical breakdown including how the Laplace Equation is satisfied by the flow on a thin airfoil, feel free to speak up. Not many pilots care at that level although it makes for interesting reading if you happen to have your old Calc III book in the house.
__________________
Turn the heat O-F-F!
Cubdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/technical/42432-lift-ground-effect-continued.html
Posted By For Type Date
Does lift go up in Ground Effect? - Jetcareers This thread Refback 07-29-2009 08:33 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna v. Piper trainers ufgatorpilot Flight Training 47 07-31-2009 08:47 PM
FedEx Ground wins appeal today (4-21-2009) cub pilot Cargo 21 04-23-2009 07:00 AM
Ground Handling Updates.. nightice Regional 2 02-21-2009 11:43 AM
FDX-Deviation ground transpo. cvilltn Cargo 27 01-07-2009 02:35 PM
9E loses AVL Ground Ops Bid nightice Regional 19 12-17-2008 04:51 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7