Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Technical Technical aspects of flying

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-02-2012, 06:53 AM   #21 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 10,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PA44 View Post
Hi Twin wasp,

maybe I'm a bit slow here, but isn't there a problem even if you hit the NDB configured already and then turn to a outbound heading of 344 +/- 5 degrees to fly a direct entry into the hold pattern like you said?
Because you can't fly a 2,5 to 3 minutes outbound leg on this heading.You're below 14.000ft here and the holding leg length should then be 1minute only as far as I know.

During your outbound leg on HDG344 you will end up east of the 344bearing from the NDB, plus you will extend the holding pattern to the north if you continue this 344 heading for 2,5 to 3 minutes so you might get quite close to the 5557ft mountain.
Not a problem if you maintain 6600ft though of course..

Maybe there is no ideal solution here, as the procedure is just not designed in a optimal
way with the huge angle from the Feeder Fix course to the NDB outbound course.

Best regards,
PA44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
You are altitude protected on the PT side. Since it is published as a PT (and not a holding pattern or teardrop) you can use whatever course reversal you want. Take a look in the Instrument Procedures Handbook under Approach and Course Reversal. You're not holding, you are doing a racetrack course reversal so none of that one minute and turn applies. You're worried about the 5557 hill. Ok, say you hit the NDB and turn on to the 344. When are you going to make your turn to 029? The only protection you have is the 6000 foot outbound altitude and TERPS builds the approach so whatever altitude they publish protects you where ever you in a sort of squashed oval anchored at the fix with the course towards one edge and the wide part of the oval where you're doing your course reversal.
Inbound from PDT, hit the overstation at the NDB, turn outbound for the course reversal, time appropriately (whatever is required in your situation to stay with 10nm), reverse course to the inbound bearing, stay above all published altitudes (TERPS has you protected from the controlling obstacle - stay within the 10 nm protected airspace of the NDB). TW nailed it.

The course divergence is well within the 120 degree max. Optimal? Depending on your view maybe not, but since the NDB is pretty restricted between PDT and ALW then those transitions from the enroute structure to the terminal structure are pretty much what you have to work with if you want an approach into KLGD.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 05-02-2012, 07:11 AM   #22 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: B747 FO
Posts: 28
Default

Interestly enough,

Under ICAO PANS OPS regulations one is only allowed to intercept the outbound track if you arrive over the fix within 30 degrees on either side of that outbound track! That's why most approaches have a holding pattern over the fix to allow you to get established within that 30 degrees if you arrive over the fix outside those 30 degrees! Handy to know if you start to fly international! If you have an international Jeppesen, take a look at he PANS OPS section, pretty wel explained.

TERPS procedures are different though and I assume they have a bigger obstacle area accounted for.
KLM pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 07:32 AM   #23 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 10,282
Default

PA44 -

Admendment to your concern about obstructions during the procedure turn during the NDB-B at KLGD.
I just read this - in the IAP example you give where the FAF is a facility (LGD), the whole procedure turn area (the intermediate leg within 10 nm) is further protected out to 6 miles either side of the course out at 15nm for both the primary and secondary areas for obstacle clearence.
You are well protected during your maneuvering during the procedure turn to reverse course.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 06:19 AM   #24 (permalink)
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Default

USMCFLYR & KLM Pilot

thank you very much! excellent information,thanks for digging out that
bit about the extended protected area USMCFLYR.

Best regards,

PA44
PA44 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS In Lieu Of NDB On A Missed Approach??? CaptainTeezy Airline Pilot Knowledge Base 24 10-16-2008 04:18 PM
Hawg gun question USMCFLYR Military 16 08-28-2008 09:15 PM
Question about ALTRAVs USMCFLYR Hangar Talk 3 08-23-2008 08:37 PM
new guy question cargo hopeful Cargo 21 03-05-2006 06:12 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:14 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.