Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Airplane Speeds Have Stagnated for 40 Years >

Airplane Speeds Have Stagnated for 40 Years

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Airplane Speeds Have Stagnated for 40 Years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2016, 08:28 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Default Airplane Speeds Have Stagnated for 40 Years



What happened to this high level of innovation in air travel? Civil supersonic aviation was banned over the United States in 1973 because of fears that sonic booms would damage buildings and constitute an intolerable nuisance. The outright ban limited the market for the Concorde to transoceanic routes and destroyed incentives for research and development of new supersonic transports. Since 1973, airplane manufacturers have innovated on margins other than speed, and as a result, commercial flight is safer and cheaper than it was 40 years ago. But commercial flight isn’t any faster—in fact, today’s flights travel at less than half the Concorde’s speed.

If we want to restore mid-century levels of aviation innovation and break the sound barrier again, we must first break regulatory barriers. The FAA should lift its ban on civil supersonic flight. Legitimate concerns about supersonic flight can be handled by specific policies that address concerns directly, such as a clear standard from the FAA for acceptable noise levels. It would be a shame to suffer another four decades of aviation stagnation.

SOURCE:
Mercatus Center Think Tank at George Mason University-
Airplane Speeds Have Stagnated for 40 Years | Mercatus
MartinBishop is offline  
Old 07-27-2016, 08:56 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 233
Default

Perhaps it is that we found the limit 40 years ago. Drag rise approaching sonic will kill fuel burn. I don't see it getting faster without a breakthrough in propulsion. There has been some development in material recently, but not enough to gain the efficiency that will be required to deal with increase in drag.
andrewtac is offline  
Old 07-27-2016, 11:52 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Passenger boats are also no faster than they were 50 years ago, and anyone who has ridden one of those loud, rough, turbine-powered craft (for example, on the Rhine River), will understand why.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 07-27-2016, 01:39 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,400
Default

Speed | Aerion Supersonic
Rama is online now  
Old 07-27-2016, 04:55 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

The Space Plane is the next big thing. 1 hour to get into orbit altitudes, 1 hour to come down. So, JFK-DCA is 2 hours, JFK-HKG is 2 hours.

I assume that the first commercial space planes will only seat about 20 people, and it will cost a lot.
atpcliff is offline  
Old 07-30-2016, 02:52 AM
  #6  
Standing by to Stand By
 
banana380's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: Holding
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Rama View Post
Worth a click, this thing looks pretty legit. Like a modern Concorde.

It would be nice to see them relax 1970's regulations, the industry has changed a bit since then.
banana380 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IFLY22
Aviation Law
10
10-26-2011 01:43 PM
Piedmonster
Flight Schools and Training
2
04-12-2011 07:50 AM
WatchThis!
Hangar Talk
69
11-03-2008 04:46 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
2
04-14-2006 04:46 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
2
01-01-2006 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices