Rumor has it that the 737 will replace the 756 on all of the west coast-Hawaii city pairs. TPA 5 makes it easier, if that's the real plan. As an LAX 756 F/O bumped from 737 Cap when the fleet was parked, seeing this happen while unable to bid LAX 737 Cap is very aggravating.
It's past time to motivate management to get the JCBA done.
I don't know if this makes it any easier as the company had the rights to do this already.
I think the company's plans to reallocate flying instead of completing a jcba is short sighted and another insult to the pilots (especially the UAL side). The only winners in a reallocation are commuters from opposing hubs. Everyone else, with the exception of wb pilots and Guam crews will be negatively affected by the company's act. I believe the union saw this and did what they could to mitigate damage.
In the end it isn't about commuters, hubs, extending TPAs. It's about a culture of chronic and inexorable wearing down of the employees so that they just give up. Lorenzo started it and although it let up a bit once, it's back with a vengeance now.
In the end it isn't about commuters, hubs, extending TPAs. It's about a culture of chronic and inexorable wearing down of the employees so that just give up. Lorenzo started it and although it let up a bit once, it's back with a vengeance now.
Bingo.
I knew a guy whose father was in upper level management at UAL during the ESOP days and beyond. His dad hated unions to his marrow and loved nothing more than sticking a finger in labors eye every chance he got. It was corp culture to screw the pilots in particular since they owned the majority of the airline. Tilton was this guys wet dream, and now Smisek is following his lead. I believe that screwing us (L-UAL) was part of the plan and they are enjoying it. It will be interesting to see how we, as a combined group stand up for ourselves in the coming months. So far, I'm disappointed in the lack of resolve and anger displayed by some of the troops on both sides of the fence. It's beyond embarrassing. I feel like I'm flying with "The Stepford Pilots".
Same pattern. 1. Beat down pilot group 2. Put out mother of all bids just before substandard TA to soften up beat down pilot group 3. TA passes 55/45. Has worked ever since contract '95.
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by davessn763
We just gave the company the "synergies" they want for nothing in return.
My thoughts EXACTLY!! Why? Why not tell someone to pound sand and present an INDUSTRY LEADING contract and THEN, and only then, can we talk?????????????????????????
__________________
Recalled for now..waiting on SCOPE
Is there anything stopping the company from doing any of this without this agreement since the existing TPA has expired?
The TPA did not expire. Essentially it was like our contract: amendable. There were terminable portions of the TPA that either side could opt out of by written notice. Until that notice came, ALL PORTIONS OF THE TPA REMAINED IN FULL FORCE.
The company could have simply notified ALPA in writing that it was terminating the provisions having to do with domiciles, flying ratios, furlough protections. Then the company could have done whatever it wanted essentially. While not the greatest outcome for any of us, some protections remain in place as of now.
__________________
I only concern myself with things I can control, SLI isn't one of them.
I don't know if this makes it any easier as the company had the rights to do this already.
I think the company's plans to reallocate flying instead of completing a jcba is short sighted and another insult to the pilots (especially the UAL side). The only winners in a reallocation are commuters from opposing hubs. Everyone else, with the exception of wb pilots and Guam crews will be negatively affected by the company's act. I believe the union saw this and did what they could to mitigate damage.
I think it's easier now with both MEC's stamp of approval on it, less likely to cause an uproar in the ranks. As you and others rightly point out, the company could have done this and more anyway, but would have risked more fallout.
IMO, it's telling that UCH wouldn't agree to make all TPA provisions expire/terminable at JCBA ratification instead of on a future date, assuming ALPA was pushing for that. Maybe their plans don't include a JCBA before, say, next spring. Given that work rules have taken a year and aren't done yet, they could drag out scope and pay for another year. By which time they'll be enjoying synergies out the wazoo and may have even less motivation to get the JCBA deal done, or even to extend the TPA provisions again. I hope I'm wrong, but every time I think it can't get any worse, it does!
I was in ground school today. G.F. said bid will be out thurs or fri. 100 to 200 openings not sure the actual amount. ORD, DEN, SFO bases with LAX getting bigger. They feel 80% of the openings at those new bases will be filled by people who want to go, the other 20% will be filled with TDY. He said no one will be forced to move.
I was in ground school today. G.F. said bid will be out thurs or fri. 100 to 200 openings not sure the actual amount. ORD, DEN, SFO bases with LAX getting bigger. They feel 80% of the openings at those new bases will be filled by people who want to go, the other 20% will be filled with TDY. He said no one will be forced to move.
Does the CAL contract include paid moves for pilots going to new dom, excuse me, bases, voluntarily and involuntarily?
I'll bet their wet dream is that most of the pilots will make lateral moves in the same fleet/seat so the transition training load won't go through the roof, and also keep the follow-on displacement letters to a minimum.
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
