LOA 25 Paragraph 4
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
I believe you heard them wrong.
Let's say a 2001UAL hire gets furloughed, comes back, gets furloughed again, and now at CAL. S/He has a total of 12 years "at" UAL, but only 5 years flying for UAL.
This TA would give that pilot 5 years pay for now.
After the ISL is complete, let's say said UAL pilot is stapled to the bottom under all the active CAL pilots. That means a 2008 CAL is higher in seniority on the list. That CAL 2008 hire will have 5/6 years at CAL. And the UAL will be "brought up" to the CAL pilot. So the UAL pilot will have NO PAY longevity for the 12 years/he put in.
A 2001 UAL hire will get the same pay rate as me being a 2008 UAL hire and a CAL 2008 hire...
Sled
Last edited by jsled; 11-30-2012 at 05:21 AM.
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
SLed
Last edited by jsled; 11-30-2012 at 05:25 AM.
#103
<sigh> This is incorrect, and there are numerous FAQs and MEC updates posted on this thread to disprove it. After SLI you get your UAL + CAL active service as a minimum. THEN "additional pay longevity credit for all time spent on furlough"......I say again...."additional pay longevity credit for all time spent on furlough" as long as that does'nt give you an earlier longevity date than the next most senior CAL guy. The next most senior CAL guy does not affect your ACTIVE SERVICE credit, just your FURLOUGH credit. The "additional pay longevity" can be 0, but it can't be negative. Sorry, not trying to be an ass, just a little frustrated.
Sled
Sled
#104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Sled
Last edited by jsled; 11-30-2012 at 06:26 AM.
#105
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
A contract can not apply to things that have happened in the past unless the parties specifically agree to it.
This example is a bit of a stretch but I think it will make the point. When you buy a house half way through the tax year, you specifically agree that the seller will be responsible for half of the taxes retroactively. Otherwise when you got to tax day, as the current owner you'd be responsible for the entire amount.
A better question is "how can people read section 3 and apply is selectively to just the CAL pilots and not to UAL pilots?" THERE IS NO CARVE OUT!!
LOA 25 makes NO DISTINCTION between CAL furloughs, UAL furloughs, or twice furloughed UAL pilots. It's sole purpose is to create a mechanism for UAL furloughs to receive FULL LONGEVITY CREDIT FOR ALL TIME ON FURLOUGH subject only to an adverse ruling by an arbitrator. THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SCREW YOU ON LONGEVITY IS THE ARBITRATOR.
I don't know how much plainer I can say it.
I think the UAL furloughed pilots are being deceived, and I don't want to see them hang their collective hat on something that isn't there. I am a UAL guy myself. I've never been furloughed so I don't have a stake in this fight. I'm sorry you find yourselves in this position. I want to see everyone of you guys made whole. I think this TA with LOA 25 makes that possible.
Be informed. Vote your interests.
#106
You are correct in that you will get 4.7 years longevity...5th year pay at DOS, just like the 2001 hire. BUT, after SLI the 2001 hire will be paid at his active years service at UAL + CAL (5 years at United + X years at CAL) as a minimum. That's all I'm saying. Change the 2001 hire in your example to a 1999 hire with 7 years at UAL and 1+ with CAL and he gets 10th year pay after sli to your 5th year pay even with 0 additional pay longevity for time spent on furlough.
Sled
Sled
That's the rub for some of the furloughed pilots that were hired 99-2001. They MAY not get their FULL 12 year pay rate (depending on ISL), while us newer hires at UAL/CAL (2008/2012) will get ALL (I lose one day actually) furlough time for pay (NOT depending on ISL).
Just doesn't seem right.
Now, on to scope aguments... (jk! )
#107
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: 756 Left Side
Posts: 1,629
Read that last line, people...
That says it all.
Not about Voting for what is right, not about Voting to fix the Industry, Not about Voting to help out the guys coming behind you, Not about Voting to fix the guys below you.
Vote YOUR interests.
Motch
VoteD NO~
That says it all.
Not about Voting for what is right, not about Voting to fix the Industry, Not about Voting to help out the guys coming behind you, Not about Voting to fix the guys below you.
Vote YOUR interests.
Motch
VoteD NO~
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
The DOS is in the future therefore no reference is necessary.
A contract can not apply to things that have happened in the past unless the parties specifically agree to it.
This example is a bit of a stretch but I think it will make the point. When you buy a house half way through the tax year, you specifically agree that the seller will be responsible for half of the taxes retroactively. Otherwise when you got to tax day, as the current owner you'd be responsible for the entire amount.
A better question is "how can people read section 3 and apply is selectively to just the CAL pilots and not to UAL pilots?" THERE IS NO CARVE OUT!!
LOA 25 makes NO DISTINCTION between CAL furloughs, UAL furloughs, or twice furloughed UAL pilots. It's sole purpose is to create a mechanism for UAL furloughs to receive FULL LONGEVITY CREDIT FOR ALL TIME ON FURLOUGH subject only to an adverse ruling by an arbitrator. THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SCREW YOU ON LONGEVITY IS THE ARBITRATOR.
I don't know how much plainer I can say it.
I think the UAL furloughed pilots are being deceived, and I don't want to see them hang their collective hat on something that isn't there. I am a UAL guy myself. I've never been furloughed so I don't have a stake in this fight. I'm sorry you find yourselves in this position. I want to see everyone of you guys made whole. I think this TA with LOA 25 makes that possible.
Be informed. Vote your interests.
A contract can not apply to things that have happened in the past unless the parties specifically agree to it.
This example is a bit of a stretch but I think it will make the point. When you buy a house half way through the tax year, you specifically agree that the seller will be responsible for half of the taxes retroactively. Otherwise when you got to tax day, as the current owner you'd be responsible for the entire amount.
A better question is "how can people read section 3 and apply is selectively to just the CAL pilots and not to UAL pilots?" THERE IS NO CARVE OUT!!
LOA 25 makes NO DISTINCTION between CAL furloughs, UAL furloughs, or twice furloughed UAL pilots. It's sole purpose is to create a mechanism for UAL furloughs to receive FULL LONGEVITY CREDIT FOR ALL TIME ON FURLOUGH subject only to an adverse ruling by an arbitrator. THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN SCREW YOU ON LONGEVITY IS THE ARBITRATOR.
I don't know how much plainer I can say it.
I think the UAL furloughed pilots are being deceived, and I don't want to see them hang their collective hat on something that isn't there. I am a UAL guy myself. I've never been furloughed so I don't have a stake in this fight. I'm sorry you find yourselves in this position. I want to see everyone of you guys made whole. I think this TA with LOA 25 makes that possible.
Be informed. Vote your interests.
The disparity between the furlough credit needed to make the average UAL furloughee whole vs the credit to make the average CAL furloughee whole is considerable. Obviously, the UAL MEC was unable to get the company AND the CAL ALPA to sign off on that disparity. So here we are.
Sled
Last edited by jsled; 11-30-2012 at 06:54 AM.
#109
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
That last line means that each person is entitled to their own vote based on their own assessment of the choices before them.
What you insinuating is that if some of these guys fall on their sword to vote YOUR interests then they will somehow be made out to be heroes and martyrs. Isn't that how religious fanatics get people to walk into crowded markets and blow themselves up?
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
So we DO agree!
That's the rub for some of the furloughed pilots that were hired 99-2001. They MAY not get their FULL 12 year pay rate (depending on ISL), while us newer hires at UAL/CAL (2008/2012) will get ALL (I lose one day actually) furlough time for pay (NOT depending on ISL).
Just doesn't seem right.
Now, on to scope aguments... (jk! )
That's the rub for some of the furloughed pilots that were hired 99-2001. They MAY not get their FULL 12 year pay rate (depending on ISL), while us newer hires at UAL/CAL (2008/2012) will get ALL (I lose one day actually) furlough time for pay (NOT depending on ISL).
Just doesn't seem right.
Now, on to scope aguments... (jk! )
The furlough credit for pay that we DID get is more than ever before at United Airlines. It may not seem fair for the 2172, but it is what we got after 2.5 years of negotiation. Go to the IAH crewroom and ask the CAL LEC reps why full furlough credit was not given to all UAL pilots. I have. Listen to their answer. It is not hard to figure out why we didn't end up with full credit for the 2172. Another 2 years of negotiation will not fix it.
Sled
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post