Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United's used aircraft speculation article >

United's used aircraft speculation article

Search
Notices

United's used aircraft speculation article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2014, 12:32 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Greg Bockelman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by A320 View Post
United is paying for and owns the new E175s going to express
Anyone know which carriers are getting the planes?
Greg Bockelman is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 12:51 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,666
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Bockelman View Post
Anyone know which carriers are getting the planes?
As far as the one's UAL is writing the check for, MESA for sure. I'm not sure on the SkyWest ones.
John Carr is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 01:19 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by A320 View Post
United is paying for and owns the new E175s going to express
Which are much cheaper to operate under their cost structure.....
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 01:53 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves View Post
I am/was complaining about the 175. How many of those are not going to mainline because we gave up that scope? The 50/70 seaters killed themselves and were going away anyway. We just gave relief to the company and Skywest etc... By giving away larger aircraft (the 175). I do hope we see the 190's or larger.

IF memory serves me correctly, UAL HAD the 175's negotiated....that is until DALAPA caved on their scope earlier that summer. Is was THAT event, realistically, that sealed your fate, vis' a vis' Pucela drawing the line on scope. Thank DALalpa.

NOW is the time where all THREE MEC's (DAL/UAL/AA) need to have a serious discussion on scope where EVERYBODY is on the same page before anybody's section 6 goes ANY further. Otherwise, all we will have is a repeat of the past
boxer6 is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 07:57 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by liveupthere View Post
Man, how did our negotiators get the 190 rates so wrong? As a junior guy, it upsets me. It would really stink to get displaced to that pay rate and take a $40/hr pay cut.
Maybe I'm crazy but getting displaced to the street would stink way worse. Cutting these aircraft (175,190) loose to fly under the whipsaw at the regional level benefits nobody except management and senior guys looking to sacrifice the junior pilots and the profession for a short term financial gain.
sleeves is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 09:01 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Moonwolf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Sleeping
Posts: 1,036
Default

As somebody who is still at a regional. Please keep the mainline flying!
Moonwolf is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 09:04 PM
  #37  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by boxer6 View Post
IF memory serves me correctly, UAL HAD the 175's negotiated....that is until DALAPA caved on their scope earlier that summer. Is was THAT event, realistically, that sealed your fate, vis' a vis' Pucela drawing the line on scope. Thank DALalpa.
Your memory isn"t serving you correctly. DCI was already operating the 175s prior to C12. While the company was allowed to add to the number of 76 seaters, they also had to park over 100 50 seaters and something close to 5000 pax seats were moved back to mainline with the 717s. Overall the DCI RJ fleet shrunk. As it is, management hasn't even reached to full allowed number of 76 seaters and has no plans to actually reach it. They would rather grab every 717 in the world they can.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 11-01-2014, 12:03 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
Your memory isn"t serving you correctly. DCI was already operating the 175s prior to C12. While the company was allowed to add to the number of 76 seaters, they also had to park over 100 50 seaters and something close to 5000 pax seats were moved back to mainline with the 717s. Overall the DCI RJ fleet shrunk. As it is, management hasn't even reached to full allowed number of 76 seaters and has no plans to actually reach it. They would rather grab every 717 in the world they can.
Ok...I stand corrected. You mean to tell me DALALPA allowed 175's with76 seats BEFORE C12? Or did they allow 70 to grow to 76 during C12 negotiations?
The type aircraft is is not as relevant as the number of seats installed.
In any case, DALALPA's C12 new scope language did affect UAL ALPA'S position during their section 6.

Everyone knew the 50 seat economics were unsustainable. Bargaining for their departure seems like a waste of leverage.
boxer6 is offline  
Old 11-01-2014, 04:24 AM
  #39  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by boxer6 View Post
Ok...I stand corrected. You mean to tell me DALALPA allowed 175's with76 seats BEFORE C12? Or did they allow 70 to grow to 76 during C12 negotiations?
The type aircraft is is not as relevant as the number of seats installed.
In any case, DALALPA's C12 new scope language did affect UAL ALPA'S position during their section 6.

Everyone knew the 50 seat economics were unsustainable. Bargaining for their departure seems like a waste of leverage.
I'm not DAL but was a DCI guy, we flew the crj900 with 76 seats before C12. What that contract did was eliminate a lot of 50 seaters and put a cap on the total number of RJs flying for the DCI system. But it also allowed a greater number of the larger RJs (crj700 and 900 and the E170/175/190 with a seat max of 76). Lots of regionals flew around with 70-76 seats (compass, Skywest, ASA, mesa, comair, republic, etc). Overall a decrease in the number of airframes at regionals, just allowed a greater number of bigger airframes that were already allowed.
Pretty good balance in the scheme of things since flying goes to mainline but regionals aren't furloughing in droves to achieve it and a lot of those guys are getting to the big leagues.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 11-01-2014, 06:49 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer View Post
I'm not DALbut was a DCI guy, we flew the crj900 with 76 seats before C12. What that contract did was eliminate a lot of 50 seaters and put a cap on the total number of RJs flying for the DCI system. But it also allowed a greater number of the larger RJs (crj700 and 900 and the E170/175/190 with a seat max of 76). Lots of regionals flew around with 70-76 seats (compass, Skywest, ASA, mesa, comair, republic, etc). Overall a decrease in the number of airframes at regionals, just allowed a greater number of bigger airframes that were already allowed.
Pretty good balance in the scheme of things since flying goes to mainline but regionals aren't furloughing in droves to achieve it and a lot of those guys are getting to the big leagues.
Thank you for the synopsis. Like I mentioned before, whatever was agreed upon in Delta's C12 contract affected the bargaining position of UAL's pilots, and not in a positive way. My take away, after 20 years, is that the Delta pilots seem to be at the forefront of allowing scoped seats to increase.
boxer6 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20420
Yesterday 11:14 PM
Golden Bear
Engineers & Technicians
8
04-29-2017 12:30 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM
Sunvox
United
24
05-07-2013 03:54 PM
nightrider
Cargo
23
09-27-2007 05:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices