Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Union Talk
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Union Talk Protecting our profession: issues, news, etc

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2009, 03:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
ALPA Pilot
 
Nevets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 648
Default TSA Gives Green Light for Next Phase of ALPA

ALPA president Capt. John Prater and National Security Committee chairman Capt. Robb Powers (Alaska) this week met with Transportation Security Administration Acting Administrator Gale Rossides to discuss CrewPASS and other security issues.


Rossides reported that TSA has approved the next phase of the CrewPASS project. The pre-operational phase of this demonstration is to begin by May 1, and the CrewPASS contractor, ARINC, will replace the ALPA-loaned laptops with new Internet-capable devices that will provide both employment status confirmation and identity verification via fingerprint biometrics. TSA has approved the deployment of this equipment at all three current CrewPASS locations (BWI, PIT, and CAE) and will add one additional terminal at BWI for a total of four lanes.


ARINC will begin enrolling pilots in the CrewPASS system in the near future, and ALPA will help the company advertise the biometric enrollment venue and date information. Flight crews will still be able to use all four lanes without biometrics for an extended period of time.


Next steps for CrewPASS include the publication of program standards by TSA, which would include nationwide implementation, inclusion of flight attendants, and other measures.


Prater and Powers also spoke to Rossides about ALPA’s views regarding needed improvements to the Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program, all-cargo operations security, the development of standards for secondary barriers, and the need for approving international jumpseating via the Cockpit Access Security System (CASS).
Nevets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 03:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 907
Default

Am I the only one who is incredibly frustrated with the fact that there are so many pilot groups fending for themselves in negotiations, but ALPA's main concern is getting me through security 5 minutes quicker?

I think my airline's MEC is doing a great job, but sometimes I wonder what ALPA national's priorities are.
250 or point 65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 04:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
Am I the only one who is incredibly frustrated with the fact that there are so many pilot groups fending for themselves in negotiations, but ALPA's main concern is getting me through security 5 minutes quicker?

I think my airline's MEC is doing a great job, but sometimes I wonder what ALPA national's priorities are.
Just because you might have a few battles pending doesn't mean you've got to tie your wrists and do nothing else. If ALPA was continuously dropping the ball, then I'd get it.
__________________
My pilot blog: http://www.passionaviator.com
Twitter ID: PassionAviator
bryris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 04:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 907
Default

I don't know, if I were making 95% of my salary while on furlough like the UAW, I may be a little more interested the Capt Prater commercial.
250 or point 65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 06:43 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyerfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: RET. EMB Current CRJ FO
Posts: 207
Default

I would have rather you said thanks to all the ALPA companies' pilots who pay dues for the organization to drive programs like this.

Don't worry I'm sure non ALPA carriers will hate hate not having to go through security anymore when CREWPASS goes nation wide.

Your welcome!
flyerfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 03:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 907
Default

You can thank me as well, I paid those dues too.
250 or point 65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 07:55 AM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 745
Default

As someone else said, I'd rather ALPA at least captures the small stuff than does nothing at all.

And YES, going through security while working a flight is an asinine dog and pony show that needs to be stopped. I'm glad ALPA is doing something about it.
__________________
It's 5 o'clock somewhere...
John Pennekamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 10:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
johnso29's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: DAL-N DC-9osaur
Posts: 2,833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
I don't know, if I were making 95% of my salary while on furlough like the UAW, I may be a little more interested the Capt Prater commercial.
I don't think that is going to last. If they want more govt help it will have to go, and if they don't then they will have to file BK and then it will most certainly be gone.
johnso29 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2009, 03:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I don't think that is going to last. If they want more govt help it will have to go, and if they don't then they will have to file BK and then it will most certainly be gone.
Yep. GM, especially, is basically a health care insurer that happens to make vehicles on the side. I haven't reviewed their financials myself, but I've heard from reliable sources that for every vehicle they make, they lose money. IOW, at this point, its not a matter of producing more vehicles to reduce the fixed cost per unit to eventually create a profit - the numbers just don't work. Every single vehicle that gets emitted at the end of the production line represents a loss to the company.

These costs will have to be shed for there to be a future for the company.

Honestly, the airlines are in a similar boat. The trend (see WN) is to not provide a pension anymore. Some legacies might potentially force themselves into bankruptcy to then be granted some relief from the existing (already cut down) pensions.

The new guys getting on board - fuggetaboutit. Better be conservative with your money going forth.
__________________
My pilot blog: http://www.passionaviator.com
Twitter ID: PassionAviator
bryris is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alpa elcid79 Union Talk 14 04-25-2009 03:15 PM
ALPA is courting my Airline Boogie Nights Union Talk 22 04-14-2009 10:10 PM
What's right with ALPA APM145 Union Talk 0 02-15-2009 05:23 PM
Colgan Certifies ALPA Russ Regional 50 12-19-2008 12:28 PM
TSA "officers" to bypass security WAVIT Inbound Regional 1 09-18-2008 11:21 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7