Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Upstart
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Upstart New Part 121 airlines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2009, 09:17 AM   #11 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
JetMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: US Aiways Hopeful
Posts: 77
Default

Just spoke with the cheif pilot, nice guy. Their going to select guys with Jetstream time first, then they'll look at people with high Part 121 time, and so on.
JetMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 01:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purpleanga's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: ERJ145 F'ed
Posts: 833
Default

Aren't 19seat Jetstreams a little old now for 2009? I bet they could have found some nice cheap 1900s on the market.
Purpleanga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 02:47 PM   #13 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
NVSSSNAKE's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CA
Posts: 12
Default

Jetstreams are not really that old and most of them have low cycle times. Also a lot less than the over priced 1900.
NVSSSNAKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 03:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purpleanga's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: ERJ145 F'ed
Posts: 833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NVSSSNAKE View Post
Jetstreams are not really that old and most of them have low cycle times. Also a lot less than the over priced 1900.
I don't know, maybe it's all the Jetstreams I've seen in the desert or the pre 90s pics that I've seen of them. If I was a pax I'd go with something newer, at least the 1900 looks like a proper airliner.
Purpleanga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 10:56 AM   #15 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
NVSSSNAKE's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CA
Posts: 12
Default

The Beech 1900 is a great aircraft. I'm big Beechcraft fan and I use to own a Sierra and a Turbo Baron. But there is nothing wrong with the J-32, its 2-1 seating is better and they also have a restroom onboard, the 1900 does not. The oldest J-32 are 1992s and like I said have lower time on them then the 1900s out there. The ones you saw in the desert (Kingman) are no longer there, most were x-American Eagle.
NVSSSNAKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2009, 12:41 PM   #16 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
yoke jerker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 137
Default

cheap is 250k sitting on a ramp. could get one running for 500k with new P & I
yoke jerker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 05:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
Fly nekkid!
 
HalinTexas's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Unemployed again.
Posts: 184
Default

I have firsthand knowledge of this operation.

Don't get your hopes up. It may never fly, and they've been working 5+ years for a cert.

They haven't been looking for J32's. None are in the states that are anywhere near flying condition.
__________________
Ex: TSA, ATA and Cayman Airways (KX)
HalinTexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 06:15 AM   #18 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NVSSSNAKE View Post
The Beech 1900 is a great aircraft. I'm big Beechcraft fan and I use to own a Sierra and a Turbo Baron. But there is nothing wrong with the J-32, its 2-1 seating is better and they also have a restroom onboard, the 1900 does not. The oldest J-32 are 1992s and like I said have lower time on them then the 1900s out there. The ones you saw in the desert (Kingman) are no longer there, most were x-American Eagle.

When did they put a restroom in the Jetstream? The 2-1 seating did come in handy when one poor lady saturated her seat cushion and moved to the dry, vacant seat next to hers. The lav would have been nice while I was flying them.
qiutong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2009, 12:58 AM   #19 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
TwinTurboPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: FA20/FO
Posts: 104
Default

Sounds like it would be a cool deal if it ever got off the ground. I always thought it would be fun to to puddle jump around my home state. Anyone remember Conquest Airlines, for some reason as a kid I always wanted to work for them. Anyway I imagine the pay would be competitive with GLA
TwinTurboPilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 11:41 AM   #20 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
NVSSSNAKE's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CA
Posts: 12
Default

Small Community Airlines is working on getting service from Dallas Love Field, TX-Lake Charles Regional Airport, LA and now we hear-''American Eagle Airlines to Launch Nonstop Jet Service Between Lake Charles, LA., and Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport'' American Eagle last served Lake Charles in November 2000. Now they want to go back! What do you think is going on?
NVSSSNAKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article-Smaller airlines' pilots have less ex Flatspin Regional 43 02-16-2009 08:45 PM
Pinnacle Airlines Corp. Announces Expansion of Partnership With Continental Airlines Past V1 Regional 61 01-22-2009 08:17 AM
Airlines sue the FAA over rest rules EWRflyr Major 2 01-09-2009 04:12 PM
American Airlines Considers Ala Carte Pricing vagabond Major 16 10-12-2008 01:07 PM
FDX - Airlines Balk at Indy Hub Bill DLax85 Cargo 3 08-30-2008 08:00 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7