Originally Posted by
rvr350
Thanks for putting it so succintly, 80. In a recent convo with my rep, he said the number 1 priority in the survey wasn't scope, but pay.fwiw.
The thing that has me absolutely dumbfounded is the TA falls short on both scope and pay. I suppose I was so in shock the past week over the thing that I was trying anything I could to tell myself to vote yes and be on with it.
If you had told me 2 months ago that we would have a TA that allows 70 more long term viable large RJs while parking 50 seaters, leaves RAH to do their thing, reduces profit sharing while coming through with only 4/8.5/3/3 pay bumps, and reduces the amount of pilots required at the airline... I would have laughed and told you our ALPA NC could do way better than that.
What I'm saying is, if pay was the top priority... yikes!
Well, here we are...