View Single Post
Old 05-28-2012, 06:06 PM
  #8  
TheSultanofScud
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheSultanofScud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Any port in the storm
Posts: 235
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
You're good to go. You are providing the training not as a CFI or under the ATP clause but as the PIC of an aircraft that requires a type. The Feds say for the SIC type that's all you need.

Is there a published letter of interpretation for this, something from a specific FSDO, or something specifically documented elsewhere that supports this?

I was always under the impression that an instructor pilot in such a situation either had to be an ATP—in a 121 or 135 environment—or had to possess the type rating + a flight instructor certificate with cat-class privileges to do the same training in a part 91 operation.

I'm not saying you're wrong by any means, I'd just like to have something published to point to if what you have said is the case.
TheSultanofScud is offline